The federal bureaucracy as part of the executive branch exercises substantial independence in implementing governmental policies and programs. Most workers in the federal bureaucracy are civil-service employees who are organized under a merit system. The merit system is defined as the process of promoting and hiring government employees based on their ability to perform a job, rather than on their political connections. This system uses educational and occupational qualifications, testing, and job performance as criteria for electing, hiring and promoting civil servants. Beginning in the federal government in 1888, it was established to improve parts of the governmental work force that had previously been staffed by the political patronage
The ongoing decisions that are made by the President, Congress, and the courts are policy implementation (Patterson, 2013, p. 340). However, when the directive is assigned by the Congress, the president, or the courts, the bureaucracy is entrusted with accomplishing it (Patterson, 2013, p. 340). Further, the bureaucracy is also constrained by the budget when implementing various decisions (Patterson, 2013, p. 340). Also, it cannot spend money on an activity unless Congress has appropriated the required funds (Patterson, 2013, p. 340).
They are in a generation where they accept the logic of organizational power in short being a conformist. Even though a bureaucratic system is obvious in our government today we are still not made aware of it specially its complications and its consequences. Up to this date we still experience complications in a bureaucratic government also in a bureaucracy mandated business. A bureaucratic government isn’t all negative it has its pro’s specially being a well-organized government as well as a well-organized business organization. but in this paper were going to talk moreover on the negative or the cons of a bureaucratic government.
Therefore, management is important and very much needed. The Authoritarian, Democratic, and Laissez management style are all different and all effective depending on the situation. If one style or approach is not successful when resolving and issue, another style is available to eliminate a hostile situation from
Coercive- The coercive leadership style was first mentioned by Daniel Goleman in conjunction with the six leadership styles defined in his theory of Emotional Intelligence. The Coercive Leader is the person rules by fear, coercive leader demands immediate compliance. The coercive leadership is most useful in the time of crisis like in a company turnaround or a takeover attempt. The coercive style can also help control a problem teammate when everything else has failed.
The process of determining what produces the best leadership may be done in terms of implementing organizational structure or process. According to an article by Smriti Chand (2014), Weber’s bureaucracy can reveal several characteristics such as fixed official jurisdiction area where each individual category within an agency would have its own fixed official duties and clear cut written rules governing each status, hierarchy of authority which governs individuals by the principle of super-ordination and subordination, clear-cut division of labor that enforces who should do what work that is decided by the agency, appointment based on eligibility that is a system for selecting employees and giving promotions based on seniority, competence of the employee and knowledge or skill, fixed salary and pension that is paid per written rules within the agency, office and maintenance of files that includes the policy and procedures for the functioning of the agency, appointment of officials on full time and long term service basis is done by appointment, difference between private matter and official issues involves written rules that an official within an agency is expected to deal with, Supervision of work by higher officials are expected to work within the written rules, systemization of official relations with officials
Another type of leadership style is a democratic leader. Two books that have very prominent leadership themes are “Animal Farm” by George Orwell and “Lord of
1.1 ELON BACKGROUND OF MUSK Elon Reeve Musk is a Canadian American businessman, engineer, and innovator born in South Africa, June 28th 1971. Elon Musk is one of the most notable innovators of the 21st century. Elon’s academic achievements in regards to higher studies began with 2 Bachelor’s Degrees, 1 in physics and the other in economics, and he would, soon after, enroll in Stanford university to begin a PhD. However, Elon dropped out of the course after a mere 2 days in order to pursue entrepreneurial activities in the fields of sustainable improvements in standards of living, space exploration and much more. 1.2 MUSK AT TESLA
Mosadeghard (2003) had pointed out different styles of leadership. These styles are: autocratic, bureaucratic, laissez-faire, charismatic, democratic, participative, situational, transactional, and transformational leadership. Aioanei (2006) explained that in autocratic leadership style, organization is highly centralized. Leaders are more concerned with the tasks to be performed rather than developing relations. In this type of leadership employees are less involved and most of the decisions are made by the management.
Bureaucratic management is mostly use in government associated organizations, while on the other hand scientific management is an aspect of manufacturing operations. In Bureaucratic management there is the existence of hierarchy specialization and also it includes formal processes. Specialization are groups of individuals who work in a specific areas which may include but not limited to finance and manufacturing. In bureaucratic management, the term hierarchy refers to layers of management and formal processes which are used to refer on how companies are organized.
Contemporary management involves many aspects of management. These aspects include planning, leading, organising and controlling operations to achieve certain organisational goals. When comparing different management levels it is evident that at all levels emphasise the importance of using resources effective and responsibly. Managers should be able to build their own as well as their subordinates’ skills, regarding decision making, monitoring information and supervising personnel are which are essential to success. Managers have great responsibilities, these responsibilities include managing a diverse work force, maintaining a competitive edge, behaving ethically and using emerging technologies.
Apple outsource this as they can focus on their core competency. Foxconn is found using performance appraisal and organizational structure in pyramid style bureaucracy. Foxconn even landed up in controversy for threatening employees using performance appraisal. So it can be noticed that whatever functions may require mechanistic structure have been outsourced. More over, Apple Inc. has applied this structure though: 1.
This style of leadership can be advantageous in highly regulated lines of business, and it can be an efficient management style in companies that don 't require much creativity or innovation from employees. Bureaucratic leadership is one of the most prevalent forms of management today. Weber 's Ideal Bureaucracy is characterized by the following: ~Hierarchical Organization ~Delineated Lines Of Authority With Fixed Areas Of Activity ~Action
2) Charismatic authority; where acceptance comes from faithfulness to and beliefs, personal qualities of the rulers. 3) Rational-legal authority; where acceptance came from the office, or position, persons authorized as limited by the rules and procedures of the organization. According to Weber, bureaucracy is a goal-oriented organization that operates efficiently to achieve their goals according to rational principles. And also, according to Weber, bureaucratic organizations operate “sine ira ac studio, meaning without a sense of bias of favor, relying solely on a professional decision-maker” (Rheinstein, 1954, 190-2). Hierarchical bureaucracy is one of the key features and essential in an organization.
There are many different type of Leadership styles. Different types of leadership styles exist in work environments. ● Laissez-Faire- A laissez-faire leader does not give direct supervision of employees and does not provide regular feedback to those under his supervision.
