Sports reporter, Kate Murphy, succinctly summarizes an overwhelming standpoint that many people seem to cite in her article "Privilege, not a job: College athletes shouldn 't be paid. " First, she stipulates herself that student-athletes technically fit the criteria of hardworking employees. She also acknowledges that it is nearly impossible for athletes to balance a job while adhering to their strict schedules. However, because student-athletes are "living the dream" and are supposed to drink up the passion and sacrifices of their game, seeking compensation is grotesque and un-sportsman like. This argument rides on the coattails of "purity."
Over 80% of the revenue comes from television and marketing rights fees. That means over 80% of the money comes from the moments the players show their skills and entertain their audience. Ken Reed, of the Huffington Post, wrote an article saying that the compensation for college athletes is not as simple as many people might think. Questions get raised such as, how should the wealth be divided? How will non-revenue sports be dealt with?
In the article, Hartnett stated that the people making money off of them other than the schools themselves, were the coaches as well as the NCAA. The article states that, “Many coaches earn at least $100,00 per year to coach one of the major sports” (Hartnett par. 11). It is true that the schools pay the coaches, because they are their employers, the money that the athletes bring in go more towards themselves. Murphy states that “the revenue that [sporting events] brings in usually doesn’t outweigh the costs of running the programs.
Some believe they should get paid. After all, these athletes are putting themselves on the line and risking serious injury.
Major football and basketball programs are the only ones which make millions of dollars every year. So, only football and basketball players from major programs deserve to get paid, but this is not fair. It would be unreasonable to the other athletes to only pay football and basketball players because they put in just as much work as football and basketball players. All sports programs have a similar schedule, and they are all demanding.
When collegiate sports first started they made back then does not compare to how much they make The NCAA and Universities make so much money because of the athetlets that come to their programs. The NCAA and college sports is a multi-billion dollar industry thanks to college athletes. The NCAA makes roughly about 1 billion per year since 2006 (Kirshner. 2018). Most of their money comes from television coverage and marketing campaigns. The rest comes from ticket sales and student fees.
After reading this paper you will have a sense of Pros and Cons of D1 athletes being paid and the side you would pick if you were asked should they get paid or not. To begin this paper it is to believe that this argument of athletes getting paid started when they let out a college video game and it had the athlete's name on the game. WIth their names being on the video game and that video game is getting a lot of money, the people they use should get a cut too. First off,
College athletes should get paid to pay because they dedicate a lot of time to their teams, they do not have time for a job, the school receives a great amount of money from the games that they perform in, and a salary would help student-athletes learn how to
Do they not deserve to be paid for their hard work and dedication? They put in so much effort to perform the best they can at their games or meets and they do all of this on top of whatever school work they get. In a Scholastic News article, one proponent expresses his opinion on why athletes should be paid. He states, “It's unfair that college athletes don't get paid.
Nathan Wise English II 1/2B Mrs. Barry March 10th, 2023 Why college athletes should get paid Eighty-Six percent of college athletes are below the poverty line and end up going into debt after school. Most college athletes will not have time to go to classes, practice for their sport, and spend time working at a job. This leads to them having to take out loans and going into debt. So if colleges added a way for athletes to get paid while practicing it would be very beneficial. College athletes deserve to be paid because they invest time and effort, risk injuries, and do most of the advertising for their sport.
These athletes should not want to be paid. These athletes should want to play for the love of their sport not for how much money they would make because they are playing their sport. If people put money into the equation athletes should only be playing their sport to play their sport no further questions than that. Another reason is because they are still young adults that are irresponsible give these young adults potentially millions of dollars it wouldn’t end up well for them. If the NCAA were ever to pay these athletes they would have to do it equally to make it fair for everyone.
I enjoyed reading your topic proposal about paying Division One athletes. Although I am conducting research on the increasing cost of higher education, I, unfortunately, do not have a lot of experience in regard to Division One athletes. In class, Ms. Budahn mentioned an incident at Northwestern located in Chicago. I believe that this would be a good place to start to try to understand why college athletes are not paid to play. Some other specific avenues that you could explore are whether or not Division Two and Division Three athletes should be compensated even though it is at a less competitive level.
The debate over whether or not college athletes should be paid has really heated up over the past couple of years. Imagine you are a college athlete; your typical daily routine would consist of an early wake up, an early morning practice, classes and tutoring sessions, and another practice or workout. Oh yeah, you have to fit in time for 4-5 meals to maintain energy throughout such an exhausting day. Athletes have to follow this routine all year long making it impossible to obtain a job to earn money. All of this hard work and time leads to success on and off the field but it also leads to enormous profit for the NCAA.
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
Other symbols that are connected in the story are the slips of paper and the black box. In the story, the slip of paper symbolizes equality among the villagers, “All of us took the same chance.” (Jackson 423). This means that all the villagers take the same chance to win on the lottery. On the other hand, the black box symbolizes death and evil.
