More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of sports in schools
The impact of sports in schools
Contribution of sports to the performance of students
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Have sports teams brought down America’s schools? Would grades skyrocket if sports were removed from schools? Or would they plummet to the ground? According to the article, “Have Sports Teams Brought Down America’s Schools” by Elizabeth Kolbert we’d be better off leaving sports separate from our schools. Millions of students across the U.S. are involved in some type of sport through their school.
Is it time to get rid of the American tradition of school sports? In the article, “Yes, It’s Time to Scale Back” the author Amanda Ripley expresses how sports are harmful to the students and school funds. However, in the article, “No Sports Are More Important than Ever” by Tim O’ Shei discusses how school sports benefit students. The article, “10 Reasons Why High School Sports Benefit Students” by Grace Chen also backs up why school sports are important. School sports are a reason for failing grades; on the other hand, there are many positive benefits to having them in schools.
When everybody argues enough and then schools decides to keep sports their should be a fee of that parents have to pay for buses, and players have to pay for half of their uniform, and then the school pays for the other half. Don’t you think? The problem is that schools think that keeping sports is a financial burden and that sports bring down students academics. Schools should not get rid of sports because school sports help improve academics, sports can bring a community together, and sports can reveal character. Schools should not get rid of sports because sport programs help test and academics.
The schools would also have more money if they stopped trying to keep the grass all green and pretty because it kills their educational funds (Ripley 10). As the teachers go along with trips they need to get substitutes to back them up, and the schools need to pay for hotels and meals along the road (Ripley). The article is trying to say that the sports put a big hole in the schools budget and paychecks to pay for their athletics. As we can tell, the data is clear, that schools should stop sports because they cost too much for all the bills and new things that make the team look bigger and maybe even better. As the community can tell, money is a big issue for schools today, another huge problem is the academic needs of the schools and students.
Nearly eight million students currently participate in high school athletic in the United States. More than 480,000 compete as NCAA athletes. (www.ncaa.org). Sports help students to develop many skill and characteristic that carry throughout their life. The two articles that I have referred to my essay are "The Case Against High School Sports", by Amanda Ripley and "Psychological and Social Benefits of Playing True Sport", by The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA).
Readers infer by this statement, that some schools do not have much money and have to not allow sports for a reason. While this might show a good reason to stop sports there are more supporting detail that sports should
the lessons learned to benefit the person in adulthood. Sports give a unique experience to kids, so funding it gives more kids those same lessons. Giving money to sports more logical because it is the sole reason for why dropout rate decreased. In article one paragraph 6 line 6 it says, “... Some students also remain in school because of sports, he noted.” This shows how the student love for sports is the single most powerful thing driving them forward to stay in school.
This notion is supported by Dr. Daniel Gould, who believes that “Children who participate in sports have increased educational aspirations, closer ties to school and increased occupational aspirations in youth” (1). People against the funding of high school sports think that parents and society are placing more emphasis than ever before and, “[P]ressures athletic personnel to deviate on winning from the athlete- centered educational and personal development mission” (Gould 1). However, athletes strive to do better in class. Michael Lorenc, a high school basketball coach believes that “those who seem to have an overwhelming schedule where they’re playing maybe multiple sports, and high academic schedules, they tend to do better than those who don’t do anything extracurricularly” (Gray). Balancing sports and school makes athletes put more effort into keeping up grades while playing the sport they love.
The stress can get so intense, it feels paralyzing. That’s why it is important than ever for schools to invest in their athletic programs,” states the sports article “Should Schools get rid of Sports.” Schools should keep their sports programs because they help improve academics, help improve mental and emotional health, and improves social skills like being on a team. Schools should not get rid of their sports programs because they help with student’s academics.
As proven, school sports are in the way of student academics, school funding, and parents engrossment in their kids learning. This topic has been an ongoing conversation, but the results show that sports are negatively affecting students. Furthermore, school sports are not only very costly, they are in the way of a person reaching their academic
Did you know that depending on the sport, students who play sports in college most likely have less than a 2% chance of becoming professional athletes? At middle schools, high schools and colleges across the country, everyone is arguing over whether or not students with failing grades should be allowed to play sports. In my opinion, a good education is so very important for our country’s youth, especially the athletes. Not a lot of kids are good enough to play in the top college sports programs in the country. But even those who are, still have an astonishingly low chance at making the professional leagues.
They think that it is making the students think it ok if they don’t like math or writing. In article 1 it says “Competitive sports is not about exercise. It’s about a fantasy with a short shelf life.” High schools think that instead of using sports to teach students about school spirit and grit they should hold a pep rally for debate team. In the article it says “The problem with mixing sports with academics is that the message it sends is dishonest and shapes kids priorities.
Sports can enhance the cooperative and strategic strategies. The passage states that, “understanding the competitive process entails an appreciation of the social nature of competition, particularly with regard to the cooperative and strategic aspects of sports and an awareness of the nature of individual roles within a cooperating group.” The last reason, which it the academic benefits, proves that you shouldn’t take away the sports for school. The kids that play sports benefit in the classroom a lot more than regular students.
Sports encourage better activity in the classroom. According to Regina Whitmer, high school athletes ¨have higher grades, better attendance, lower dropout rates, and fewer discipline problems than their peers¨ (Whitmer). At most schools, there is an academic requirement in order to participate in a sport. At some schools,
In Ripley’s article, she tells about the grade difference before and after sports were abolished at Premont High, her data shows that after the school canceled athletics, “80 percent of students passed their classes, compared with 50 percent the previous fall (10).” After Premont eradicated sports, the district had lots of work to do, but soon, as Ripley stated, “the students will feel the kind of pride in their academics that they once felt in their sports teams (10).” This data shows that by annihilating physical activities, taking place after class, schools will witness an amazing change in the overall grade average. On account of the fact that sports are causing academic failure, schools should put an end to after class athletics.
