Federal Land Policy Essay

Analyzing federal policy can be very complex, it involves multiple agencies and groups and covers millions of square miles across the country. Some agencies who are tasked with managing federal lands include: The U.S. Forestry Service which oversees the national forests, the BLM which main-tains lands used for energy production, grazing, and conservation, and the National Park Service which is responsible for all U.S. national parks and other lands used for recreation or preservation. (Ballotpedia, n.d.) There are programs which have proven to be effective, but still could be improved; and those which have a history of not accomplishing the goals for which the policy was intended. This issue requires multiple groups to work together to figure out which method or methods would be best, based on the particular program. The most effective way is to not to try and manage each program and agency the same, but to attempt to tailor the style to each particular issue.
Reaction of elected officials and staff This criterion can be defined as how elected officials and their staff feel about a certain policy issue can determine how much support the policy can expect to receive within state or federal government. If politicians as stakeholders believe in, in this case, the reorganizing of Federal land policy, it is

Fish and Wildlife Service) policies often come up against powerful groups such as the agricultural or energy industries and even when a policy protects the environment, it’s often disregarded. These types of pro-development be-havior have in recent history can be contributed to higher level officials initiating policy actions, strategies of interest groups changing to affect which policies are passed. (Davis, 1998). This is particularly true of certain industries which rely on favorable policy in relation to the use of federal