There was discussion of judicial review in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton, which explained that the federal courts would have the power of judicial review. Hamilton stated that under the Constitution, the federal judiciary would have the power to declare laws unconstitutional. He also stated that this was appropriate because it would protect the people against abuse of power by Congress.
The Federalist Papers No. 51 were written by either James Madison or Alexander Hamilton to address the various concerns the residents of New York had with the newly formed government provided to them and the other colonies via the Constitution, more specifically the purpose of the new structure of government, the separation into different branches of the government and each branch’s reliance on the people, and the system of checks and balances and duties placed on each branch among other things. The Federalist Papers No. 51 also explained the necessity of the government outlined in the Constitution and why the founding fathers found it best to arrange the new government the way they did. One of the main ideas addressed in the Federalist
In the Federalist Paper number 51, Madison writes to the people of New York to explain that it is necessary for a separation of powers between the departments of the government. Madison, with the help of Hamilton, wrote the Federalist Papers to explain sections of the Constitution. In Federalist Paper number 51, Madison explains that the government does not have a strong structure on the outside, but creating a firm structure within the government could be a solution. The firmer structure would be the separation of powers. In order for the people to get a better idea and make a more accurate judgement about the separation of powers, Madison shares observations and puts them into simpler terms.
James Madison opposes another paper entitled “Federalist Number 51”. This paper addresses issues on liberty, the structure of the government, and the branches of the government. Madison wanted to assure that all branches have the same amount of power and authority in order to gain independence in a particular branch. As citizens, we are supposed to elect the president, the legislators, and the judges. However, the judicial system does not work that way.
In the Federalist Papers Fifty-Three, Fifty-Six, Fifty-Eight, Sixty-Two, and Sixty-Three, James Madison writes about the proper way to carry out the new form of government, in regards to the Legislative Branch. In Federalist Paper Fifty-Three, James Madison writes, “Some portion of this knowledge may, no doubt, be acquired in a man’s closet; but some of it also can only be acquired to best effect, by a practical attention to the subject, during the period of actual service in the legislature” (pg. 333). This means that serving two terms in the House of Representatives in more convenient because it allows the Representatives to acquire more knowledge.
I Agree… “The Federalist No. 84” and “The Anti-Federalist No.84”, both have their views on what should happen to our government. Whether it is to add a bill of rights or not, but I agree with the writer of “The Federalist No.84” because if the Constitution is adopted, then it will be our Bill of Rights, also based on other countries’ bill of rights then it may argue with a semblance of reason. Because I have read both sides of the discussion, I can see who is wrong and why.
Federalist No. 10 by James Madison addresses the framers’ fear of factions that naturally come from a democracy. He begins by defining what a faction is, referring to the institution of factions in government as “mortal diseases under which popular governments have everywhere perished…” Factions, he says, are the biggest danger to governments everywhere because of the problem that arises from any group gaining power over any other group, destroying the democracy so sought after and replacing it with rule by the majority group. An obvious solution to solving the problem of factions is to abolish them in government.
Antifederalist Paper 69 – The Character of the Executive Department versus Federalist Paper 69 – The Real Character of the Executive Department “On the whole, it would be, in my opinion, almost as well to create a limited monarchy at once, and give some family permanent power and interest in the community, and let it have something valuable to itself to lose in convulsions in the state, and in attempts of usurpation, as to make a first magistrate eligible for life, and to create hopes and expectations in him and his family of obtaining what they have not.” -Antifederalist Paper 69. The Federal Farmer. “Would not the prospect of a total indemnity for all the preliminary steps be a greater temptation to undertake and persevere in an enterprise
10 in an attempt to ratify the Constitution, the new form of government for the United States. In the Federalist Paper No. 10, Madison analyzed the way to deal with facts, made a comparison between a pure democracy and a republic, and made another comparison on whether a small government or a large government would be the best for America. He informed the people that there is not a way to completely get rid of factions, but there are ways to deal with them. One great way to deal with factions is by having a government that knows how to control and deal with their effects. Madison believes that a republic can do that job better than a democracy, because a democracy is a small society of people who can not admit there is a cure to factions.
The Federalist Papers consisted of eighty-five letters written to different newspapers in the last 1780’s, urging ratification of the United States Constitution. The Constitution needed approval from nine out of the thirteen original states. I agree with the Federalists concerning the issue of whether or not the Constitution should have been ratified as written. I have this viewpoint for many reasons. One is because I agree with the points Madison stated in the 10th Federalist paper where he discusses the fact that the Constitution makes the government capable of controlling damage and violence caused by factions, or political parties.
The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments is an essay written by James Madison, published on February 6, 1788 as the 51th essay of the Federalist Papers. The Federalist No. 51 is considered one of the most important and relevant essays of the Federalist Papers. According to Madison, the purpose of the essay is to inform the audience about the importance of government structure with regard to making liberty possible. Madison considered each branch of the government should be independent from each other, but at the same time have some sort of power to keep the others from abusing their function. According to Madison, no branch should be allowed to appoint the other branches’
Simonton’s argument on oligarchy as an ideological commitment to anti-democracy that was historically preserved by political institutions is a brand new scholarly theory. How does Beard’s historical account of the rise of the Republic maybe tell a story of an oligarchy trying to accommodate the popularity of popular government while still maintaining control? The rise of the Republic is poorly documented yet again by the Romans, Beard notes. The Roman mania for simplification hid much of what had happened; this simplification also arose from the fact that there were few records.
These elections must be held on the basis of universal, equal and secret suffrage so that all voters can choose their representatives in conditions of equality, openness and transparency that stimulate political competition” (Inter-Parliamentary Council 1997). Therefore the first element of the political structure one must examine when seeking to determine to what extent the Roman Republic was a democracy is the voting system and how it was implemented both in theory and in practice. If a voting system was not utilised there would be no argument, but as it stands, the mere presence of a voting procedure is not quite sufficient evidence of true democracy. To ascertain the full extent of Rome’s democratic tendencies one must examine the voting system in somewhat greater
In 1787, a final draft of the Constitution was submitted to the states for ratification. Those who were in favor of the ratification were called Federalist or nationalist. Among these federalists, were James Madison of Virginia, John Jay of New York and Alexander Hamilton. They had a concrete proposal. They wrote a collection of 85 essays defending the principle of a strong national government.
Introduction Classical Greece is considered one of the foremost noteworthy periods in Western civilization, and its impact can be felt in different perspectives of advanced Western society and culture. The bequest of Old Greece can be seen in legislative issues, reasoning, science, craftsmanship, and writing, among others. In this exposition, I will legitimize the claim that Classical Greece affected present day Western society and culture by examining a few cases in detail. One of the foremost noteworthy ways in which Classical Greece impacted cutting edge Western society is through the concept of majority rule government.
