During the ratification of the constitution, the debate between the federalists and the anti-federalists raised many important points. Some main points included were- power of central government, role of the states and the inclusion of a Bill of Rights. Based on the principals brought up, I would consider myself an anti-federalist. I would consider myself this because I agree with their principles and ideals on States’ right. They believe that the power should focus mainly on the people rather than on a federal government. In addition, the inclusion of a Bill of Rights gave us some of the rights and freedom that we enjoy to this day. I consider myself an antifederalist because they helped shape our rights, freedom and future. Some main differences …show more content…
I would choose the anti-federalists because the federalists do not want to make positive improvements to the constitution. They want ratify the constitution as quickly as they can and they want to rule us. This type of strong government may be too strong and it may lead to tyranny. As Patrick Henry stated, “You and your fellows created in Philadelphia a central government that has the potential to take unlimited power. The states should be supreme, with rulers and ruled close enough to know each other so that rulers can be checked.” This quote reaffirms that the anti-federalists’ want stronger protection for state rights. In addition, the anti-federalists agree that a stronger government is necessary and they understand that the constitution allows congress to facilitate trade between states but, they are concerned about the lack of individual rights. As Richard Henry Lee wrote, “The state legislatures are obliged to take notice of the bills of rights of their respective states,” meaning that the states have individual rights written into their own constitutions and lawmakers pay attention to them. However, we cannot expect federal officials to examine every state constitution before making a law to be sure it will not violate rights protected in any state. The Constitution itself needs to list these rights. By being an anti-federalist, I am certain