Galileo Vs Copernicus Dbq

795 Words4 Pages

From the periods 1500 to 1700, The Scientific Revolution led to heretical ideas against the church. According to the bible, man was considered the pinnacle of creation as well as other creations such as the sun been considered the center of the universe. Copernicus aroused with the creation of the heliocentric theory, stating that the sun was not the center of the universe and Galileo “agreed with his teaching enabling him to understand nature’s phenomena that according to hypothesis, it remained inexplicable.” In addition, this theory challenged the church’s authority and beliefs. Throughout that time, because church was really strict, it decided to go against the theory, because it was contrary to what the church stands for, as well as questioning God. As a result, Copernicus knew he could not stand against the church’s beliefs, so he wanted to explain himself to the Pope, along with the church through a letter explaining his beliefs and point of view. First, when the church got the opportunity to study more about man, they knew this historical event would be considered the pinnacle of creation. The debates of science versus religion is commonly known, because it has been carried throughout time, where religion states that there is only one God and all living things were created by his image, while science …show more content…

Both Galileo and Copernicus agreed that without the approval of the church and Europe, they would be accused of heresy. During that time, everything the church stood for cannot be questioned, and this made them seem more important. The Heliocentric theory was pretty much calling the church a liar. The punishment for questioning the church was burning or torturing people, excommunication, burned books, and anything they could do to insure their version of the truth was correct. The church’s punishment forced Galileo to go against what he believed upon the heliocentric