In this article, it is contended that criminal justice is a framework. On that note, many scholars have questioned the fact that criminal justice consists of subsystems instead of one complete system. Essentially, it is contended that general systems theory (GST) produces significant bits of knowledge into both the structure and working of criminal justice agencies and associations. The article starts by auditing general systems theory itself, alongside past endeavors to apply it to criminal justice. Next, general systems theory is connected to the multifaceted nature and assorted variety of criminal justice agencies and associations. At last, hypothetical bits of knowledge are proposed about criminal justice structure and working, in light of the general systems theory point of view. …show more content…
This constitutes a yield from one agency contributing the information to the next agency. Most researchers contend that criminal justice is not a framework in a hypothetical sense. In this article, it is contended that general systems theory (GST) uncovers vital bits of knowledge into criminal justice structures and capacities. In particular, it is contended that the criminal justice framework forms cases as opposed to individuals, and that the shared objective of criminal justice handling is to close cases with the goal that they remain shut. It additionally is contended that altering capacity logically decreases the fact that at every framework point the ensuing organization cannot enter the greatest number of cases as the past agency can yield. Every agency encounters reverse tensions to close cases so as to decrease contribution to the following organization. This article features that criminal justice specialists and agencies are best comprehended as working with regards to the entire entity, accordingly it is inferred that criminal justice is a framework in the sense of general frameworks