With mass consumerism at an all-time high, many actions have been developed to make eating and living affordable and available to all people. This includes nationwide manufacturing, commercial farming techniques, genetically modified organisms, and as simple things such as bottled water or non-perishable processed foods. With all of these advancements, is there a potential down fall to gene splicing and pesticide use in available food? Can these new organisms coexist with the body’s natural functions? And if they are proved not to interfere with people’s health, what about the environmental impact this new technology has on Earth’s future. It’s hard to evaluate if a GMO or pesticide in one fruit or vegetable will react differently to …show more content…
As the population of the world continues to increase, it will be accompanied by an increase in the demand for food (Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, Vol. 8 (1), 147). Since the total acreage planted is no longer increasing, unless new production technology is adopted, the world food market will raise food prices and lead to food shortages, especially in underdeveloped countries (Cambridge, Vol. 8 (1), 147). A big debate in the past few years to fix this epidemic has been the topic of genetically modified organisms, or “G.M.O.s.” These genetically modified foods have been created to make food grow faster, bigger, more nutritious, more colorful, and tastier. This way of producing food has good and bad attributes. A good aspect of gene splicing food is that more nutrients, vitamins, and minerals can be placed into the fruit or vegetable. Another improvement is that it makes the produce more colorful, last longer, and in some cases more flavorful. The downfall of these procedures is that the adding of foreign genes into natural substances changes the foods cells and ultimately it’s DNA as a whole, resulting in unnatural reactions to the human body’s