ipl-logo

Gerrymandering Pros And Cons

497 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: How does gerrymandering affect elections

Gerrymandering Position Paper Gerrymandering is the irregular redrawing of district lines to give one political party an advantage. Gerrymandering usually starts with a census. Every ten years, it is necessary to recount the people to redistribute the seats for the members of the House of Representatives. If a state gains or loses states it is necessary to reapportion the state. Reapportionment is redistributing representation within the state by reassign the representatives districts. The goals of this is to make districts of about equal size, sometimes to do this redistricting must occur. Redistricting is redrawing electoral district lines so that to create new districts for the representatives. This is what can lead to Gerrymandering. If one party hits the “trifecta” , meaning they control the governorship, senate, and house seats, then they are able to redraw the district lines. Gerrymandering is wrong because it does not let people have their proper voice in the government. An example of this process is the gerrymandering in Ohio. In the 2010 census, …show more content…

All of these states voted for President Obama, however; all of these states also send primarily republicans to represent them in the House. This can become a major problem because many republicans are talking doing away with the “Winner takes all” method of electing a president. Now while this does seem fair, the Republicans want the vote go be through congressional districts. Meaning if they win the district they get that vote. Obviously this is extremely corrupt. This means that the republicans can gerrymander someone right into the white house. This is not fair because it does not give the democrats any real say in who they want to be their president. And obviously Ohio has been voting for democrats, with the gerrymandered districts it is very likely that they would elect a republican

Show More
Related
54 Words | 1 Pages

Small states wanted equal representation, and large states wanted representation based on

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

But, if you were in the same district and opposed the current political party, you might say that gerrymandering is unfair because they give the current party in power an advantage. It gives them an advantage because they are the ones that author the redrawing of districts.

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

During political elections, or the presidential election per say, the election process can be hectic. Political parties strenuously work to convince people to favor their candidates. They perform this in order to receive political control and to rise in the governmental system. Two infamous political parties that are always competing are the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. The lure of gerrymandering is enticing because they take control of a state legislature by advancement of redistricting.

Read More
1264 Words | 6 Pages

The Reconstruction is known as  period after the Civil War. (1865-1877) These were the years the federal government used to rebuild the retreated states. Indeed the causality in the election took place during the Reconstruction and with folks in the South were growing tired of the oppression  and lack of control, they saw an opportunity to gain back control of the state. In result Hayes was in favor of the Electoral Commission and was also supported by the Democrats only because he agreed to withdraw the troops in the South. (history.com)

Read More
258 Words | 2 Pages

In my own words some of the pros and cons of the Electoral College are as followed and explained. My pros are that it maintains the federalist system, and allows for minority interests to be represented. It helps maintain the federalist system by keeping all of the branches of government equal. It helps allow for minority interests to be represented by helping the interest and have the ability to be represented and backed up by bigger parties to help get votes. My cons of the Electoral College are that is does not reflect the popular vote, and lowers voter turnout.

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

Is Gerrymandering a Controversial Topic? Gerrymandering is a process where the ruling political party uses the map of their state to draw lines that create voting districts in favor of their party. The result of this is that it doesn’t reflect the voters political views. For about 200 years the government has used gerrymandering during political elections and it continues to be used today (King, Elizabeth) .

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

Since the Constitution was amended in 1951 to limit President’s two terms, many political scientists have observed that congressional term limits could cure the imbalance between these two branch of the federal government. In Congress, the term limits have people

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

This is a weakness because, the bigger states base the electing off of wealth and population. So most of the delegates come from the bigger

Read More
634 Words | 3 Pages

The smaller states are weighted to give them more electoral votes, but because of the popular vote the larger states still have a bigger pay off in the end. No states has enough electoral votes to elect a president and by a president focusing on a specific region of the US, they gain little to no power because the other states that are excluded, majority of the time will not vote for that candidate based off of the fact they do not believe they would benefit from their vote (Posner, 2012). Swing States are the ones that pay most attention to the election knowing they are the difference and will recieve the most attention from the candidates. This makes the people of those swing state very causcious in their desicions and should be one of the greater impacts of the elections (Posner, 2012).

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

This new change could lead to having more people interested in politics, it could also bring a bigger younger demographic of voters to vote, and it could bring a better representation of the opinions in the county. This

Read More
1356 Words | 6 Pages

The problem of disproportional electoral votes can be demonstrated by the election of 1988. In this particular election, the combined electoral votes of North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, Wyoming and Washington D.C. (twenty-one in total) equaled the the electoral votes of Florida. This is intriguing because the combined population of those five states was 3,119,000, whereas Florida’s was 9,614,000 (Kimberling). This shows how powerful a handful of rural states can be, especially the ones that tend to be overlooked by campaigning

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

At first glance this doesn’t seem like a bad thing, everyone gets an equal say, right? Wrong! This means that Wyoming which has a population of about 500,000 voters will have an the exact same say in presidency as California which has a population of 35 million voters. Essentially, highly populated states will find that their individual votes count proportionality less.

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

Gerrymandering; the process of manipulating district boundaries in order to gain a political advantage, and also one of the most controversial politic topics in today's government. Many people are for, and also against, changing the redistricting process in an effort to eliminate gerrymandering. The textbook and attached video provide answers, and then some to any questions about gerrymandering. To begin, the redistricting process takes place every 10 years. It takes place every ten years because the national census takes place every 10 years, allowing the redistricting to follow directly behind the census.

Read More
975 Words | 4 Pages

The Electoral College system the founding fathers devised helps to balance out the power of the large, populous states. This system forces candidates to campaign in all states since they all carry some sway in the elections (“Understanding the Presidential Election”). However, other issues present themselves as well, like states with large independent voters that can be swayed and the issue that a candidate can lose the popular vote and win the election. The first issue is that states that are equally divided between democrats and republicans and hold a large number of electoral votes like Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania are considered swing states. (“Understanding the Presidential Election”)

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

It does that by incentivizing the parties to write off the more than 40 states including the District of Columbia that they know they either cant win or cant lose. By doing this it makes it so they go after the bigger states such as California, Texas, and New York, with that being said they also go after Minnesota because it has had the highest voter turnout. There are of course people who think that it should stay the same or people who just don't care about the Presidential election for which ever reason. To them I really want them to think about it.

Read More

More about Gerrymandering Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document