ipl-logo

Gmo Foods Poster Analysis

1161 Words5 Pages

Visual Art Poster: The purpose of this poster is to advertise against GMOs. This poster was created by a guy with a website called Deesillustration, he creates art work/posters to put a point across against certain topics, in this case GMOs. The target audience for this particular poster would be for those who buy or consume GMOs. It has been made with images and phrases that are on a whole biased and inaccurate. This is used to scare the readers and therefore make them against GMOs when a lot of the images and phrase portrayed are not true or exaggerated. A biological idea seen in the poster is the food; the poster shows images of potato with eyes and fingers, Snail broccoli and Tomato and trout genes. This idea is used in the poster to scare …show more content…

The video claims the tests were done on rats and problems such as growing slower and having fertility problems occurred. Although this may be true with some extreme example of GMOs, the video implies that all GMOs do this. Even when people have been eating GMOs for years and haven’t been affected. We also see that this Lab rat test wasn’t even regarded as fair “the research methodology was widely condemned as flawed.” So using this example in the video is inaccurate and showing a bias against …show more content…

One test that was found to be flawed is used to say that GMOs are bad and we should stay away from them. This has great consequence on the public as people will watch this and without research will believe it. GMOs have the potential to help a lot of things such as world hunger. New GM rice has the potential to be made which has genes that help Vitamin A deficiencies. This new rice could save a lot of people who suffer from vitamin A deficiencies, but videos like this one who are providing false or bias information are steering people against GMOs the very thing that could help us in many ways. There doesn’t appear to be any vested interests as there is nothing to say who the creator works for or what could be the reason for making the video, most likely a guy who has a strong view on GMOs and wants to put it out there. The overall impact on the public is against GMOs. Right through the video the creator use a sarcastic voice to his advantage to promote against the GMOs. Also little hinds like the picture and subtle words give an overall negative affect. This means that the public who don’t have much logic around the topic will side with the opinion of the video and therefore not see the positive impacts GMOs can

Show More
Related

The Green Monster Analysis

692 Words | 3 Pages

This is reflected in his first-person narrative introduction as a consumer interested in a product known as “South River Miso.” He is primarily interested in this product due to it being labelled as “GMO free.” The author is using a food, which is a common interest between all people, in order to strike interest in the audience that they should be more educated and aware of the contents in their food. He purports that “It’s as likely as not that you know GMOs by their stock term of derision: Frankenfoods. ”(Envision in depth p.g 351) This sentence in itself, supports my claim that the intended audience consists of general food consumers, of which may be “pro-organic” in their food choices.

Read More

Examples Of Paranoia In The Crucible

1121 Words | 5 Pages

Support over the GMO company is questionable to say

Read More

The Rosenbergs: A Case Of Nuclear Secrecy And National Hysteria

3004 Words | 13 Pages

The Rosenbergs: A Case of Nuclear Secrecy and National Hysteria Introduction In the spring of 1951, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg found themselves in the unfortunate situation of being the first American citizens to be convicted of espionage during peacetime. Their case has become an emblem of the American nuclear age, and especially of the American attitude toward nuclear secrecy. Today, the Rosenberg case has become a highly disputed event that provides a debate between the importance of national security and secrecy and the impacts of national hysteria. At the time of the case, the ongoing Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union saw the nation place national security and nuclear development as its highest priorities, and the

Read More

Genetically Modified Foods Rhetorical Analysis

588 Words | 3 Pages

Furthermore, she enlightens her readers by revealing “Many other countries require labeling and some countries have banned all GM foods” (Mathers 43). This triggers the readers to question whether GMOs are as safe as they claim. In a logical aspect, why would other places around the world enforce stricter regulations on GMOs if they are insignificantly different than organic foods. By notifying her audience how other nations distinguish GMOs, she effectively forces her readers to interrogate how innocent are GM

Read More

Why Is Gmo Bad

497 Words | 2 Pages

Some experts claim that GMOs can solve the world 's hunger problem, however, it is not a black and white question, meaning that it is not a simple question to answer and people have different opinions on whether it is positive or negative for our country. A GMO (genetically modified organism) is the result of a laboratory process where genes from the DNA of one species extracted and artificially forced into the genes of an unrelated plant or animal. The foreign genes may come from bacteria, viruses, insects, animals or even humans. This can cause problems, that can be extremely dangerous, nevertheless, it can help plants protect themselves from certain diseases or animals.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Can It Be Genetically Modified Food?

598 Words | 3 Pages

A corporatist markets off what they know would put them in financial ruin if people found out the truth behind what they claim is bettering the world. Once gathering enough positive claims, they proceed anyway. This is the quintessence of GMO marketing. Now, as the newest generation, millennials are likely to have been fed these genetically modified foods growing up, but have the technology to research and make their own intelligent and informed decision on whether these foods should be continued to be produced and distributed throughout the world. It is not being overly suspicious to not believe a corporation such as Monsanto, the leading agrochemical company, when with minimal research they publicize that GMOs are safe to consume.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of GMO Labeling

1826 Words | 8 Pages

The desire for GMO labeling stems from

Read More

Summary Of Monsanto's Reasons For Fighting GMO Labeling

1705 Words | 7 Pages

This cartoon piece “Monsanto’s Reasons for Fighting GMO Labeling? It Love You” was published in various publications such as Yes! Magazine, Greenpeace, the Center for Media and Democracy, and PBS’s Urban Conversion on October 24, 2013. Joe Mohr created this cartoon that that sarcastically imitates Monsanto’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Hugh Grant, about how genetically modified organisms (GMO) labeling is causing high stress levels, global warming, and more exposure to cellular radiation. Mohr, an environmental- theme cartoonist for various well-known publications, and creator of the comic “Hank D and the Bee” is known for helping young adults to older individuals understand, in a hilarious way, the importance of being aware of the issues

Read More

Thesis Statement For Gmo Persuasive Essay

998 Words | 4 Pages

Research Outline: Genetically modified organism Thesis Statement: Even though some individuals in the United States believe GMOs negatively affect society due to health risks, it does not because of environmental benefits, lowers cost of food/increases production, and assists the wellbeing of humans. Introduction Hook Connect to the hook A GMO or Genetically Modified Organism is an organism that has changed or altered a food product on a genetic level. Genetically modified means that food has been changed. Some people believe that GMOs have a positive effect on society; however , others believe that GMOs could possibly hurt the environment and the health of humans.

Read More

Genetically Modified Foods In The 1980's

1124 Words | 5 Pages

In 2012, Chinese researchers, led by Chen-Yu Zhang of Nanking University, found that the insecticidal RNAi Monsanto uses on their crops to stop bugs from eating it, could adversely affect humans. They found that it triggers an increase in “bad cholesterol,” leading to a heightened risk of heart attacks (Koberstein 50). In 2013, Monsanto published a rebuttal that “suggested that Zhang’s results were warped by contamination on lab equipment” (Koberstein 50). Clearly, the GMO companies won’t stop until they halt any suspicion of their products. Warren Porter, professor of zoology at the University of Wisconsin, states why exactly these big corporations go after scientists.

Read More

The Danger Of A Single Story By Adichie Analysis

1337 Words | 6 Pages

She concisely elaborates on the limited perspective about a group of people and how the “single story” perspective has harmful effects. Adichie begins the video segment with an anecdote of how when she read English storybooks as a child, she had the impression that stories had to be written about foreigners. When Adichie wrote these stories, she had no idea that the concepts and ideas depicted in her books can be about anything. Adichie referencing this anecdote shows how when a situation is told with good intentions, it still can have unforeseen negative consequences. News articles about GMOs are on the same playing field.

Read More

Monsanto Sustainability Paper

536 Words | 3 Pages

Through this network they claim to leading the food and nutrition dialogue where they work together with culinary specialist, dietitians, nutrition scientists, and other experts to engage conversations about food and nutrition. Interesting enough, the section in the report dedicated to this is simply an interview with a member of the Monsanto L.E.A.D network who is describing her experience as a member. Not only is this biased because she’s a member, but also because according to the interview in the report, the person receives a yearly honorarium from Monsanto [2]. As positive as the interview may sound in terms of nutrition and Monsanto’s product, the crude reality is that the genetic modification of food is not necessarily a healthy thing. In fact, GMO foods are so volatile at the molecular level, that they may interact differently whenever ingested and manifest themselves through allergic reactions [3]

Read More

Gmo Persuasive Speech

1096 Words | 5 Pages

GMOs are considered to be the next agricultural “innovation” as some would say, but this is incorrect. They think that GMOs are a way to feed everyone on earth. Giving them the nutrients that they need to grow in conditions that most plants can’t live in, while not causing harm to physical and environmental health. They are wrong. GMOs do more harm than good.

Read More

The Perversion Of Nature

1471 Words | 6 Pages

The Perversion of Nature In modern day, families across the globe consume potentially harmful genetically modified products, with little to no knowledge of the effects they may have on a person's health (Bailey 4). The uninformed society will then go on to pass down the negative affects of these GMOs to children and pets (Bailey 1). Society relies on cheap, yet damaging, “frankenfood” leading corporations have created (Cummins 1). Poor regulation and greed of mankind has brought upon a devastating future for posterity (Cummins 2).

Read More

Gmos Argumentative Essay

966 Words | 4 Pages

With superior positive environmental impact, quality and quantity of GM crops, why would anyone oppose them? The reason to support genetically modified crops is that they produce a superior amount of whatever they supply. Ian Murnaghan says that the increased production could be used to feed people in developing countries or overpopulated areas where enough food is not steadily available. The seeds of these plants may cost more, but the maintenance cost decreases significantly.

Read More

More about Gmo Foods Poster Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document