ipl-logo

Group Vs Standard Agenda

1595 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Individual vs group decision-making

Intro:
Throughout this essay, I will be demonstrating the similarities and differences from the group performances between The Squad and Group 6 using the Standard Agenda. The Standard Agenda is “a highly effective, structured method for decision making and problem solving in groups.” (pg. 262) I will be using the six steps that are incorporated within the standard agenda, which are: Problem Identification, Problem Analysis, Solution Criteria, Solution Suggestions, Solution Evaluation, and Solution Implementation. (pgs. 262-267) The purpose of this assignment is to understand the correct way to use the Standard Agenda as a group to solve a problem.
Identify and define the problem
Problem Identification can be made out if the question is of …show more content…

Also, in this step the group is required to rank the criteria in order of most important. A thing that a group should keep in mind is to not mention possible solutions in this step, because then the group will not come out with an effective solution to the problem. (pg. 2630 While observing Group 6, I noticed that they were showing more of a we-orientation or collectivism setting. This means that all members were being incorporated and given a fair chance to speak anything on their mind. For instance, when one of the members is not communicating as much as everyone else is, then one person in the group will single them out in a way to bring their attention to the ongoing discussion. (pgs. 18-19) However I noticed that The Squad for this step was displaying the Structuration Theory. The Structuration Theory is when a small group establishes some sort of structure to follow through to the end. (pg. 41) For example, The Squad did a great job in generating the criteria, as well as ranking the criteria according to which is the most important to the least important. In this stage both groups did a great job in listing and ranking the criteria, for others to understand what is going on throughout their decision making …show more content…

Once a list of idea have been made the group should clarify any confusing ideas, but to also combine any ideas that overlap each other. (pg. 265) Team Talk was well performed by Group 6 in this step. Team Talk is a strategy to create cohesiveness. (pg. 211) For instance, all the members in the group would realize that when listing the possible solutions they were all on the same page. This made it easier to clean up any solutions that were confusing to others or make the solutions clear. Then when The Squad was performing I noticed they fell into Groupthink. Groupthink is something no group wants to encounter in any situation. Basically groupthink is when a member or members of a group decide to go into extreme detail and think of the perfect solution. With groupthink going on they lost time resulting in rushing the steps after this one. Unfortunately no solution is going to be

Show More
Related

Forgiving Student Loan Debt A Good Idea By Kayla Webley Summary

1165 Words | 5 Pages

With student loan debt on the rise across the United States of America, measures must be taken to address the issue of millions of Americans facing tens of thousands of dollars in debt immediately after finishing college. According to Robert Applebaum, a man that began a petition for the United States federal government to offer a one time deal of forgiving all student loans, to forgive these loans is a necessity and may prove to boost the economy. In Kayla Webley’s “Is Forgiving Student Loan Debt a Good Idea?”, the journalist and correspondent for Times magazine takes a long hard look at Applebaum’s proposal and just how forgiving the student loan debt is likely to play out. Throughout her article, Webley dissects the argument for forgiving

Read More

Qlt1 Task 1

1996 Words | 8 Pages

Contents Task 3.1 2 3.1.0 2 3.1.1 2 3.1.2 3 3.1.3 4 3.1.4 4 3.1.5 4 Team Activity 1 4 3.1.6 4 3.1.7 15 Summary 15 3.1.8 16 Team activity 02 16 3.1.9 16 3.1.10 22 Summary 22 Task 3.1 3.1.0 Team is collection of individuals to get together and coordinate with each other to achieve a common goal. (Authors view) “A group of people with a full set of complementary skills required to complete a task, job, or project. Team members (1)Operate with a high degree of interdependence (2) Share authority and responsibility for self-management (3) Accountable for the collective performance (4) Work toward a common goal and shared rewards(s). A team becomes more than just a collection of people when a strong sense of mutual commitment creates synergy, thus

Read More

Groupthink By Naomi Karten, And The Crucible By Arthur Miller

761 Words | 4 Pages

In The Dangers of Groupthink, Naomi Karten provides the reader with a few of many examples on how they can avoid the dangerous phenomenon that is, Groupthink. Karten expresses her opinion by stating, “Diligently avoid a no-criticism culture and a no-criticism decision-making policy.” (The Danger of Groupthink, 2). Being able to avoid a nonconstructive environment is an extremely courageous step that can ultimately lead to one’s success. However, for one to achieve such a large task takes a tremendous effort, and requires one to place both their feelings and well being on the line.

Read More

5th Grade Analysis Essay

634 Words | 3 Pages

TEKS 5.11 (C) Analyze how the organizational pattern of a text (e.g., cause‐and‐effect, compare‐and‐contrast‐, sequential order, logical order, classification schemes) influences the relationships among the ideas (13) 3. For each of the TEKS identified in #2, suggest a product or performance assignment that would help these students master that TEKS? Justify your use of each assignment (20-40 words each) TEKS 5.6 (E) I will separate the students into groups of four. They will work cooperatively to finish a graphic organizer.

Read More

Minority Influence In 12 Angry Men

1458 Words | 6 Pages

“The Twelve Angry Men,” are a small group. Several theories of group performance are shown in the movie “Twelve Angry Men,” but they are subject to interpretation and run a less evident. Social facilitation, group polarization and social loafing are evident within the

Read More

Remember The Titans Analysis Essay

1713 Words | 7 Pages

The external pressures significantly affect the formation of the team. Personal identity and complex interpersonal interactions result in a highly charged environment and a tense group

Read More

Mount Everest Simulation Paper

1434 Words | 6 Pages

The main factor that may have affected our group and its overall unsuccessful journey to the summit is groupthink, which is decision making unconsciously influenced by other group members (Loughead, 2015b). Having just met our group members for the very first time, it was surprising how our team interacted with everyone, communicating and sharing their opinions freely. There was no one sitting there is silence or what appeared to be just agreeing with every decision. However, I wonder if the knowledge of how important and dangerous this journey was unconsciously prevented members from expressing their true thoughts or options in order to maintain our group cohesiveness and minimalize conflict. As a group, we collectively made decisions through discussion and problem solving.

Read More

Alcoholics Anonymous Meeting Reflection

1551 Words | 7 Pages

All members of the groups were on different levels of acceptance with who they are as a person and the process expectations. Although members on different levels and stages of steps, they all had the same commitment goal. They all accept who they are because prior to members speaking the have to state their names and admit their problems. For any member of the group to be able to handle the changes in their group, they must some knowledge about their group leading

Read More

Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

1535 Words | 7 Pages

Group think According to Janis, who coined the term; groupthink “occurs when a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment” (1972, p. 9) further group think often leads to a decrease in the mental efficacy perception of reality and moral judgement, as personages find themselves in a group system that seeks high cohesion and unanimity which delimits the motivation of the individual to realistically appraise alternate courses of action (Janis, 1972). A common trait of a collective experiencing this phenomenon, is an inclination to take irrational decision making in addition to members of the group being similar in background and further being insulated from external insight. Comparably the singularity of groupthink is present in the film 12 Angry Men, and appears anecdotally, early on the film, present in the expected unanimous vote of ‘guilty,’ that will send the defendant to the electric chair. Invulnerability Literature surrounding the concept of group think is greatly rooted in the writings of Janis.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Groupthink

1011 Words | 5 Pages

Fit in or Stand out Park's meta-analysis, Flowers's study, Cline's study, Pearl Harbor, and Bay of Pigs invasion, are all victims of group thinking. It is taking over various aspects everyday lives. Companies, schools, and even churches are being affected by an idea call the New Groupthink. (Haymon). Most people now work in teams, in offices without walls, groups in congress.

Read More

Forte Communication Style Report Essay

605 Words | 3 Pages

All four of our members’ secondary strengths are non-dominance, so we handle everything in a cooperative manner. As the extroversive members begin to shoot out ideas left and right, the patience that is held within the other half rationalizes our options and brings us to a common conclusion. The biggest motivator for our group as a whole is production, based on an organized structure that allows us to stay focused throughout the duration of the assignment. We don’t like to deviate from the plan; we like to see what needs to be done and when.

Read More

Group Mind Experiment

815 Words | 4 Pages

As an individual one has the ability to form their own unique opinions and make their own choices, but the way a person thinks or feels can easily be influenced by the surrounding environment. Being in a group setting can especially impact and triumph over one’s individual thoughts. This principle, known as group mind, is a collective set of ideas and opinions shared by a group that come together to form one mutual belief. It can become confusing to separate an individual’s opinion from the groups. A person needs to become aware of the effects of pressure within a group in order to remain objective.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Cooperative Learning

948 Words | 4 Pages

On the other hand, if group rewards are given on the basis of a single group outcome/performance such as the team completing one worksheet or solving one problem, there is little motivation for group members to explain concepts to each other and one or two group members may do all the work (Slavin, 1995). Slavin

Read More

Teamwork In Health Care Essay

2037 Words | 9 Pages

INTRODUCTION The word ‘team’ can be defined as a group of people working together towards a common goal. A team also generally is known as a group of people with different skills and different tasks, who works together on a common project, services, or goal. Then, the important thing in teamwork is ‘collaboration’, which is the act of working effectively with others to achieve a common goal. Collaboration acts as the lifeblood in the team, even the team is not large enough, but the collaboration is required.

Read More

The Three Stages Of Schutz's Group Development Theory

808 Words | 4 Pages

Interpersonal behaviors are used to meet their needs, their group interactions are characterize by these behaviors and therefore determine which stage are they currently in during a group development. Schutz divided the group development models into three phases: inclusion, control and affection phase. Firstly, the inclusion phase. During this phase members are anxious becoming group members. The focus is on whether to be in or out of the group as one is not sure to what extent will, he or she is supposed to get involved with the group.

Read More

More about Group Vs Standard Agenda

Related Topics

Open Document