ipl-logo

Gun Control Argumentative Essay

1193 Words5 Pages

“Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both” (Franklin: “Ben Franklin Quotes”). The issue of whether to get rid of gun control laws or to have stricter laws has been a highly debated topic for years. There should be no more gun control laws because they do not decrease murder rates, they violate the Second Amendment of the Constitution, and humans need guns for self-defense. Copious amounts of people strongly believe that guns will get rid of the highest murder rates, or in the least, decrease them. However, that is seemingly false. Gun control laws do not decrease the murder rates or in other words: getting rid of guns does not get rid of violence (“Gun control: five reasons …show more content…

Only one amendment has been repealed in the Constitution and that is not getting rid of the right to bear arms. “The Second Amendment clearly recognizes the inalienable natural right to self-defense. Lawmakers ay outlaw certain types of weapons, but they may not disarm the citizenry” (Phillips). When a right is inalienable, it cannot be taken away, not even by the government. Countless multitudes of people strongly fear that the government will take over their very lives. Someone has said, “You give an inch and the government could take a mile” (“Gun Control: Five reasons…”). Or, “People fear gun control would be the first step towards the people’s rights being removed little by little” (“Gun Control: Five reasons…”). Clearly, if the government took away the citizens inalienable rights to bear arms, then they can certainly take away other inalienable rights, such as life, liberty, and property. It is said that, “The Founders understood that the right to own and bear arms is a fundamental and as essential to maintaining liberty as are the rights of free speech, free press, freedom of religion and the other protections against government encroachments on liberty delineated in the Bill of Rights” (“Should more gun control laws…”). Some people believe that “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm …show more content…

“A Pew foundation report found that 79% of male gun owners and 80% of female gun owners said owning a gun made them feel safer and 64% of people living in a home in which someone else owns a gun felt safer” (“Should more gun control laws…”). Many times owning a gun can prove to be quite helpful and may even save your life or the lives of others. Wayne LaPierre says, “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun” (“Should more gun control laws…”). Nelson Lund says, “many gun control laws interfere with the ability of law abiding citizens to defend themselves against violent criminals” (“Should more gun control laws…”). Additionally, Lund says, “the right to self-defense and to the means of defending oneself is a basic natural right that grows out of the right of life” (“Should more gun control laws…”). According to the National Rifle Association, guns are used for self-defense 2.5 million times a year. The police cannot protect everyone all of the time (“Should more gun control laws…”). If guns were outlawed, then law abiding citizens would not be able to protect themselves. “Criminals would continue finding ways to illegally acquire guns while robbing and attacking law-abiding citizens who suddenly have no means of self-defense” (“Gun control: Five reasons…”). John R. Lott had something similar to say, “the problem with such gun control laws is

Show More
Related
587 Words | 3 Pages

(Bitto 2). Changing a constitutional right would be a slap to the face of the founders of this great nation. Many other authors feel the same. “The second amendment states that citizens have the right to keep and bear arms.” (Bitto 20).

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

In the 1790s, the Bill of Rights was supplemented into the constitution. The second amendment, ratified in 1791, summarily states that the citizens of the United States have the right to bear arms. In pure contrast to this, I believe that the need to stand for more gun control laws being enacted in the United States is more vital now than ever. Times have simply changed since the 1790s, and the need for the second amendment

Read More
421 Words | 2 Pages

Gun ownership doesn’t increase crime. “While gun ownership doubled in the twentieth century, the murder rate decreased.” (Thomas Sowell, Paragraph 3) Time and time again, different countries and states increase in gun ownership and crime seems to deteriorate. To those who say that it is just a coincidence, the facts say otherwise. Gun control laws infringe upon the right to self-defense and deny people a sense of safety.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Since the begining of America, the Founding Fathers wrote the strong-standing Bill of Rights with amendments to protect the country that had just recently won their freedom, but one amendment has been the top theme of controversies for centuries. Gun laws offend the Bill of Rights in so many ways and they prove ineffective. Gun Laws are relevant due to thousands of deaths and self-protection. The argument goes on but without guns there is militia, one of the main intents of the Second Amendment. These simple rules can reduce deaths, proven by millions of influential people.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

There are those who believe that society is a safer place when guns are not a part of it. They feel as if making laws and regulations will keep them safe when they go to bed at night. However, an important aspect that many of them fail to address is the fact that criminals do not obey such laws. Criminals will do whatever they want, regardless of what some paper says they should and should not do. Therefore, making more and more regulations on guns is only stripping away the only safety against crime that law-abiding citizens can rely on: their own firearm.

Read More
1596 Words | 7 Pages

When the topic of Gun Control is debated, it can go either coarse. All throughout history in America guns have been used against the people, and on the other hand, they have been used for the good of the people. Our country is based on the ideology that “Someone or something is good until proven to be otherwise.” There should be stricter gun control laws because: it prevents mass shootings, reduces gun deaths including self-harm/ domestic violence and it’s also been an effective control in other countries.

Read More
2700 Words | 11 Pages

Gun Control In light of such tragedies as the Newtown and Aurora shootings in Connecticut and Colorado, respectively, there has been a public outcry for stricter gun control laws such as a ban on assault weapons and stronger background checks. Our society has a long history quoting the second amendment’s right to bear arms as a prime example on both sides of the argument. The opposition states that we should keep the Constitution the way the framers wanted, that our “right to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” However, the supporters of gun control claim that the framers wrote the Constitution according to the time it was written and that we should evolve and amend the Constitution to reflect the current era.

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

If you did not know, the Second Amendment states, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II) As I stated earlier, people are highly concerned that stronger gun control laws will take away this right. I completely understand this concern, yet my research has led me to discover that this should not be a worry.

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

According to the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment specifically states that “the right of the people to keep

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

and “It’s my right to bear arms!” are the two most common arguments presented when talking about gun control, however, many other arguments are left unheard. In the name of gun control, one must first view the positives and negatives before taking a plausible stance. The Second Amendment, of the United States Constitution, ensures “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Strasser).

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

Studies show that gun control laws don’t prevent crime or violence, the owner does. This doesn’t mean that gun control laws won’t reduce death by gun. (Gun Control) The reason for many gun purchases are to fulfill the owner’s “sense of security” from having a gun. Guns are meant for use in more ways than one such as, hunting or self defense, but many people find other ways to put them to use.

Read More
1052 Words | 5 Pages

Finally, the thought that tightening gun control will stop mass shootings can’t be an answer to gun violence because there is no critical proof showing that that's true. That thought is based on quick thoughts and misconceptions. Thinking that

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

With the recent surge in mass shootings and gun-related deaths, gun control has once again become a focal point of discussion. The debate over gun control has been a contentious issue in American politics for decades. Gun control is a highly complex and emotional issue, with advocates on both sides fiercely arguing their position. Some argue that gun control is necessary to reduce the number of gun-related deaths and improve public safety, while others argue that it infringes upon their Second Amendment rights. However, when all evidence and empirical data is taken into account, it is well within reason to conclude that gun control is an ineffective measure that doesn’t suppress gun violence in America.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

A recent Quinnipiac University study suggests, “states with stricter concealed-carry laws have higher murder rates than states that are less restrictive.” This information demonstrates the fact that in places with more restrictive gun control, there is often more gun violence. This represents how gun control measures in states have not had a positive effect. Since the violence rates didn’t fall when restrictions were put into place, it is evidence that the restrictions do not help. The laws did not make the US safer.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.

Read More

More about Gun Control Argumentative Essay

Related Topics

Open Document