ipl-logo

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Can T Be Morally Justified Essay

1088 Words5 Pages

The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Can’t be Morally Justified. A part of the industrial mentality of the 20th century was “Grow or Die” with the follow-up in the inorganic and egoistic political growth model. Fuhrer and his Axis Allies, the Prime Minister of Italy and the Emperor of Japan have conspired the idea to rule the Entire World in 1939. The pinnacle of this reasoning was the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 6, and 9 of 1945 bringing Japan to the ultimate surrender. Why the American bombing, still the turning point in a WW2 history, cannot be morally justified? The Historic Reasoning The USSR declared war against Japan on August 8 to meet the obligations before the Allied Powers; however, unexpectedly, on August 6 and 9 of 1945 the U.S. Air Forces dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As a result, Japan signed peace treaty in the WW2 on September 2, 1945. Still the position of the U.S.A. was neither necessary nor sufficient to end the war this way. According to the Yalta and Potsdam Conference, the Allied Powers committed that the USSR should declare the war against Japan in 90 days after the defeat of the Nazi Germany was the only necessary condition to end the war ultimately. The U.S. Office of the Historian referred to opinion of historian Gar Alperovitz, “weapons …show more content…

President should be the mission and strategically driven to serve to the nation. Can a decision to drop the atomic bombs on the peaceful Japanese cities be virtuous without the clear mission and strategy? The President’s decision was more military and experimental rather than virtuous. Moreover, the U.S. President carried out that ‘experiment’ on the people of the other country, who gave neither a consent, no having an understanding about the purpose of that ‘experiment’. The example is the Milgram Obedience Experiment where the goal of the experiment was to achieve the obedience

Show More
Related
424 Words | 2 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima The bombing of Hiroshima was the right thing to do due to the military lives that were going to be lost if the bomb did not get dropped, America also wanted to impress Russia or intimidate them by dropping it and the president saw this opportunity to make japan surrender as well. This all supports the main point on why it was the right thing to do but many to all Japanese say otherwise Lots of soldiers lost their lives because of the conflict with japan, in document B, it states,”123,000 Japanese and Americans killed each other”. Paul Fussell, a WWII soldier also stated, ”war is immoral, war is cruel”. This is speaking for all the soldiers in the war or most of them, this also means that he doesn’t like war and it would

Read More
310 Words | 2 Pages

Imagine being put in a predicament whereby you have to make a crucial decision, either by dropping bombs to save countless lives or to let the enemy proceed on brutally killing thousands more…What would you do? Quite frankly I feel that the answer is a “no brainer!” Harry Truman’s decision, the president of the US, on dropping atomic bombs upon Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Japan was the one who first attacked the American Pearl harbour, and up until this time America was completely neutral during the war.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

Why would killing so many people ever be justified? First off the Japanese were nearly done before the bombing , so the bomb wasn’t necessary. “The JApanese were already defeated and ready to surrender...” (Document 6). This quote shows that the bomb was not necessary and was just the United States showing off a new weapon they had.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Today, Many historians argue that America should not have dropped the bomb on Japan. People believe that is was morally incorrect for Americans to completely destroy two cities in Japan with many civilians. Even though dropping the atomic bombs was a violation of International Law, it was justified because it saved more lives than killed, it was the only way the Japanese would surrender and it made America more powerful. While the dropping of the bomb seems like it killed so many people, it actually saved more lives.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

This image shows how big of a threat and danger Japan is- it also shows how important it is to bring Japan down. The atomic bombs are justified because of Japan’s aggressions towards U.S. The United States’ use of atomic bombs on Japan is justifiable because it saved thousands of American lives; the Japanese were given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S.

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

Although it was inhumane and horrific, we were justified in dropping the atomic bombs because American soldiers were being tortured, American bodies were disrespected after death, and the bombs ended the war preventing more American casualties. The first reason that America was justified in dropping the atomic bombs is that American soldiers that were captured in Japan were being tortured. When Japanese soldiers captured American soldiers, they needed some way of trying to get them to give up valuable information because the U.S soldiers wouldn’t just tell them for no reason. So they began torturing them in hopes they’d crack. Document 2 showed the numerous

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

In the year of 1945, the U.S. had dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, causing a lot of damage. The U.S. was justified when dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima because the Japanese was already ready to surrender and the japanese was already defeated, so there was no point. The bomb killed so many lives that shouldn't have been taken. Thousands of innocent people died or got wounded very badly, which was very unnecessary. Some people even became really sick as well, which was completely unnecessary.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

In 1945, Germany surrendered, leaving Japan as the only Axis Power still fighting in WWII. The US devised plans that would force Japan to surrender. In August, 1945, the US ended up dropping two atomic bombs; one in Hiroshima and one in Nagasaki, which ultimately led to the surrender of Japan. Some believed that the atomic bomb should have not been dropped because it was barbaric as it killed many innocent civilians while some thought that the atomic bomb was necessary in order to get Japan to surrender, ending the war. President Truman’s decision to use the atomic bombs against Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a justified action as it was necessary to end the war while saving the American troops lives and prohibiting Russia from interfering with Japanese affairs.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

On August 6th, 1945, The United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing many people. The president at the time, President Truman said that he only wanted to use the bomb in military warfare because it would hurt women and children. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was morally incorrect because the Japanese were ready to surrender, it was a crime against humanity, and it affected their physical self. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unsuitable because the Japanese were ready to surrender.

Read More
1232 Words | 5 Pages

Again, the Japanese had no knowledge of the bombs, causing even more devastating casualties. People have argued over the years if the atomic bombing was justified or not, and multiple points can be made on both arguments, yet I take it that the bombing on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified. Keep in

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

However, this does not give the US the right to commit them as well. Eye-for-eye logic isn't morally sound in the context of warfare and is outdated. The bombs can't be justified at that same point because innocent civilians were killed, not any military or government official. I say innocent due to japanese citizens not taking part in any war crimes and

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

Since the Japanese were willing to inflict the most harm possible, the war may have lasted several more years. By 1945, those involved in the war were shattered. Therefore, the use of the atomic bombs was justified because it put an end to an already horrific

Read More
1840 Words | 8 Pages

Was America Justified in dropping the atom bomb on Hiroshima in August 1945? On August 6th, 1945 at 8:16 AM, a great yet horrific event in history occurred. This event is known as the dropping of the atom bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan, the event that would begin and end the pain and suffering of millions. The atom bomb was dropped by an American B-29 Superfortress bomber named Enola Gay and

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

Due to Japan wanting to call its quits, there was no need for America to bomb them in the first place. If we did not bomb them they would have surrender but since they were already conventionally bombed and fire bombed to the point of weakness they called its quits. Afterwards, 70,000 Japanese citizens were vaporized and in the months and years that followed, an additional 100,000 perished from burns or radiation sickness stated article “The decision in dropping the bomb.” Since so many innocent lives were taken it could have been easily

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

While making the decision of bombing a city, you don’t know what the outcome will be. However, you do know that your enemy would be greatly weakened, leaving them suffering from the loss of innocent people, and having to deal with that issue rather than fighting your enemies in a war. It could even be hypothesized that they would eventually surrender due to their immense struggle caused by the war. It is impossible to see what the future holds, however if there was a chance that my decision of bombing two japanese cities could end a great and bloody war, I would take it. It would be quite the burden knowing you took away the lives of thousands of innocent people, but in the end, you are saving more lives from being lost by ending the

Read More

More about Hiroshima And Nagasaki Can T Be Morally Justified Essay

Related Topics

Open Document