Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Julius caesar leadership
Cassius julius caesar leadership
Cassius julius caesar leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Julius caesar leadership
Cassius julius caesar leadership
Cassius julius caesar leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Julius caesar leadership
The external conflict in the end was that he was murdered from the fear that he was going to be too powerful. If he wasn’t like this than he would have still been alive. This shows Caesar to be a tragic hero because he is noble and loved by Romans, but his flaw held him back from going farther because he was
Historians may argue that Julius Caesar helped rome to make it better and stronger for the people. While this might be true this is misleading because all of Julius Caesar's good actions like giving people more jobs,but it just covered up his worse actions that hurt rome. Also Julius Caesar was named a awful man throughout history from not persevering in hard situations, hurting not helping rome, and doing things for himself. To begin with Julius Caesar was named a awful man from how he didn’t persevere in hard situations. One way he didn't persevere was when Sulla (the emperor of the time) ordered Julius to divorce Cornelia (his first wife) because she was from the family of Sulla's enemies.
Caesar eventually defeated Pompey and was the sole rule of Rome, thus tried reforming every aspect of the people’s life. As a result, Caesar ruling as a dictator significantly contributed to the fall of the Roman republic as Rome was no longer a republic but a
Julius Caesar created the taxes, laws, and more to help keep the Roman Empire balanced. People respected him as their leader. He made a created a working system that they voted for. There were other powerful government officials that felt Caesar had too much power and that it was going to hurt the Roman people. So they killed Caesar.
Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln are unquestionably two of the great men that made significant history via their exemplary leadership expeditions in their respective countries. In comparing the two, one of the remarkable similar aspect of the history that came up between them was their assassination. Caesar is recalled as one of the history strongest general and an exemplary leader of the great roman republic. Many referred him as a demagogue and a dictator due to his act of abuse of power and disregard of the Roman laws that existed (Griffin, 2009).. He led his army in multiple battles against their enemies in 15 years during the civil war.
He stabilized the empire, and thus destroyed the republic. His short reign ended what was left of the republic. People contemplate whether or not he was a good leader, and if he is the main reason for the fall. In reality, the fall of the republic was inevitable. Caesar just sped it up slightly.
In the greatness of ancient Rome, an evil act took place that destroyed the balance of power and changed the course of history. Even though some have praised Julius Caesar's assassination as a courageous attempt to protect the Republic, it is clear that it was a planned murderous act that called for legal consequences. Senators became irritated with Julius Caesar as he made changes and grew in power. On March 44 BCE, a group of conspirators assassinated Caesar within the Senate walls. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a determined act of violence that should be punished under the law, despite political motives and noble intentions.
Julius Caesar was one of Rome’s most successful and outstanding leaders. The question of whether or not he deserved to die is very simple. No, Julius Caesar did not deserve to be assassinated for the good of Rome because he was the good of Rome. Politically, militaristically, and economically he benefited Rome. Did the conspirators kill Caesar for the good of Rome or for their own personal motives?
Unfortunately for him, he becomes the biggest enemy of the Republic. To make matters worse, Caesar decides to cross the Rubicon River with his army which causes a Civil War because he was asked to cross the river alone. The result was a pervasive and deadly civil
This proved his worthiness to being ruler by justifying his abilities to provide for and protect his empire. Since the Romans did not like that title of king, “he received the title Augustus by decree of the senate.” During his reign, Caesar accomplish countless things, which is why he is still talked highly about to this day. He repaired the conduits of aqueducts, dozens of temples, and completed the Julian forum and the basilica. He did these things because, like Qin, he loved and truly cared about his empire and wanted to see it flourish and restored; not broken and destroyed.
Another accomplishment Julius did was he brought down Roman debt, and this satisfies many borrowers and lenders. Julius Caesar also improved the Roman calendar to the Julian calendar, and he granted citizenship to people living outside of Rome. Secondly, Julius Caesar helps the poor and middle class a lot, which these classes favor him. Julius
For example, Martin Luther King Jr, Abraham Lincoln, and Archduke Franz Ferdinand just to name three. Each assassination is unique in their own way. However, the assassination of Julius Caesar’s is especially unique. The assassination of Julius Caesar is unique compared to other
Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.
Julius Caesar was the Dictator of Rome in 42 BC who accomplished many things. Many people believed that he was a hero, but Julius Caesar was a very ambitious dictator and was more of a villain than a hero. Julius Caesar was a villain because he didn’t think first before doing something, he forced the Senate to name him dictator for life and he also was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. To begin with, Julius Caesar was a was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. Caesar used his power as dictator more towards his advantage instead of helping the people in Rome.
Julius Caesar was very popular with the plebeians and lower classes for supporting them. He did this in ways like creating jobs for them. He made many other reforms such as enforcing laws against crime, and including supporters from Italy and other regions in the senate (Cornine et al. 248-249). He made a new Roman calendar, which was helpful to everyday life.