How Did Principal Goings Frame The Problem Involving Mr. Watson?

The first step to problem solving is framing the problem. How did Principal Goings frame the problem involving Mr. Watson?

According to ISLLC standard three, “A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes the success of all students by ensuring management of the organization, operations, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment.” This including the focus on human resource management, development and operational procedures and structure within the school. Principal Goings framed the problem with Mr. Watson as an attendance issue. This is the beginning of Structuring the problem. Principal goings decided to generate his approach to problem solving with Mr. Watson by referencing steps that were taken

Principal Goings framed his decision making merely around Mr. Watsons attendance. I believe that this would be the perfect coaching and leadership opportunity for Principal Goings to take advantage of. As an educator, you’re required to be present, innovative, and dedicated to enhancing the learning for all students when scheduled or participating in scenarios that could affect student learning. I think that a one on one meeting should take place to discuss Mr. Watsons attendance, Educator responsibilities, school policies, and next steps. This would also include a self-evaluation. Continual communication and checks-ins need to take place in order to ensure that the teacher feels supported and will cooperate with suggestions and feedback. Communication needs to be clear and direct. I don’t think that verbal reprimand without these steps shows how effective the principal can be. Principal goings problem solving skills shows that he is not willing to take additional steps to encourage and motivate his teaching staff. Framing the problem requires strategic planning; verbal reprimand should not be the first

Assume that Principal Goings framed the problem in relation to students. That is, the teacher arriving late to first period deprived the students of valuable instruction time. Given this perspective, do you believe he would have made the same decision in relation to Mr. Watson? Why or why not?

I strongly believe that principal goings should have framed the issues around the students and the teacher requirement to be present and fully committed to fulfilling their responsibilities as educational leaders. The students come first, and if they have a teacher that does not value the importance of attendance and the effect it has on student’s long-term progression, then next steps should be considered by the principal. The School Culture and climate is based on a shared commitment to the students that should be abided by at all times. For instance, there are policies based around student progression, success, and classroom structure, scheduling, and curriculum. Putting students first requires preparation on the part of the teacher in order to produce a critical foundation that arranges opportunities for students to be observed, evaluated and in a balanced classroom environment. Mr. Watson’ actions cause a clear disservice to students being observed and in order to address the severity of attendance, emphasis needs to be put on teacher accountability, professionalism and instructional