ipl-logo

How Does The Scientific Explanation For The Cause Of The Universe

1385 Words6 Pages

HOW UNIVERSE CAME INTO EXISTENCE BY CHANCE OR DESIGN
What is the scientific explanation for the cause of the universe? How did the universe begin? Was it by time and chance or someone designed it? The origins of the universe have implications on how life was made possible for without any matter, life would be impossible.
There a Chance the Universe Came into Existence By Chance
Christian philosophers and apologists raise several rebuttal points in response to the claim that the amazingly finely-tuned universe we live in came into existence “by chance”:
• Chance has no Beingness: “Chance” cannot explain the existence of the universe because chance is merely a mental concept which describes mathematical probabilities. Even a rock has “beingness” …show more content…

The most recent observations and measurements put the original “bang” at about 13.7 billion years ago. It was said to have exploded from a point of singularity. This is the most generally accepted theory there is on the beginning of the universe and the theory that is most widely believed in the scientific community. What existed prior to the Big Bang is purely speculative and completely unknown. Astronomers have detected noises that emanate from all points of the universe that are sounds of radiation left over from the original bang. NASA has also detected cosmic microwaves from the farthest reaches of the universe that may be this same “echo” left over from the original Big Bang. There are no plausible explanations for what caused it to explode and no one can be certain what existed before the Big Bang or what made it go bang. It is so nonsensical in their estimation of how the universe began that it is hard to take them …show more content…

Perhaps the greatest example of this is the discovery of the fine-tuning of the universe. The consequences of this are phenomenal either one believes that we are incredibly “lucky” or that someone designed our universe. If you are really desperate to avoid God, you invent the “multiverse theory,” which speculates, without any empirical evidence, that the universe is one of billions of universes that just happen to provide the fine-tuning for life. The problem is that these fail to answer the ultimate question of what was the cause for the universe or these “billions “of universes.
Those who reject the Creator not only have to believe that matter came into being without any cause; they also have to believe that life itself popped into existence without an adequate cause. Neither of these propositions explains the origins of matter, the universe, and life. As I said before, if at one time there was absolutely nothing that existed, then nothing would exist today. Something had to have existed before the finite, singularity of the Big Bang happened
Why Did God Create Everything?
What Quran

Show More
Related
818 Words | 4 Pages

When working in the science fields there are many obstacles a person of faith may face. The biggest of these is the controversy over the concept of evolution and how the world came into being. Atheists and evolutionists are always trying to find ways to disprove God with science. However, after spending several years learning about how nature and chemicals work together to form our world it is hard for me to imagine that all of it came into existence without a creator.

Read More
1022 Words | 5 Pages

In William Craig’s ‘kalam’ version of the cosmological argument he argues that “the universe has a cause of its existence.” His argument relies on two crucial premises which state that “whatever begins to exist has a cause of its existence” and “the universe began to exist” (Craig). In this paper, I will begin by breaking down Craig’s take on the cosmological argument. I will then propose an objection to his argument that questions why there must be a cause of the beginning of the universe, and furthermore, why this cause must be God. I will conclude with a response Craig would give to this objection.

Read More
1757 Words | 8 Pages

(p. 70) There are a plethora of counterarguments that attempt to discredit the theistic view; for this analysis, we will briefly discuss three of them. First, the opposition may claim that the universe has always existed. The non-temporal cosmological argument is not oscillated by such claims because, as discussed previously, it does not depend on the earth’s age, only its constituents and their origins. The second, and perhaps most famous, rebuttal used by those attempting to disprove God’s existence concerns His origin.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

It make sense that galaxies are still expanding to even this day after 13.8 billion years. This agrees with Newton's 1st law, if something is in motion it will stay in motion

Read More
2678 Words | 11 Pages

The existence of God has been hotly debated for centuries. With the rise of the theory of evolution and the enlightenment movement, people have moved away from the belief that there is a being who created the universe. Man has conquered the mysteries of science and become confident in his understanding of the world without God. H. J. McCloskey is one such person. He argues in his article, On Being an Atheist, against the classical arguments for the existence of God; namely: the cosmological and teleological arguments.

Read More
1545 Words | 7 Pages

“God does not play dice”. The author, Alastair Rae, cleverly started off the book with the famous statement by Albert Einstein. Right from the first sentence, he grabs the reader's’ attention and interest into the discussion of fundamentals and conceptual problems in the field of quantum theory. Firstly, this statement implies that Einstein disagreed with the uncertainty of the theory of quantum mechanics where at the atomic level, nature and the universe occurs randomly.

Read More
653 Words | 3 Pages

Before watching this video, I never realized that God could never be completely ruled out. God is so great that even science can’t come close to understanding him. Episode 2 explained how scientists think our universe began. I believe that God started our universe and made it perfectly for us. Science has proven that our expanding universe needs to be started somehow.

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout human history, there has been serious philosophical and religious discussion about the rationality of believing in God. Some argue that faith in God is foolish since there is no empirical support for it, while others support the rationality of belief based on moral sense, life experience, and difficulty of the universe. It is essential to take into consideration many viewpoints and arguments when thinking about this issue. Philosophical arguments, such as the cosmological argument, which holds that the existence of the universe generally suggests an eternal cause, can be used to justify the rationality of believing in God. Known as a god of God.

Read More
1934 Words | 8 Pages

When one comes to the question ‘where did all the matter from which these things formed?’ scientists have theorized that it all came from the Big Bang. For physicists, the Big Bang was the first domino which started the universe. Theologists, however, assert that there must have been something that caused the Big Bang, and that that something must be God. The easiest argument against the assertion that God must be the first domino in the chain of events is to apply the cosmologist’s own logic to his conclusion.

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

There have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each were proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction.

Read More
1533 Words | 7 Pages

There are many disputes and opinions on how the Universe began and whether or not is has a beginning, as well as if whether the Universe is finite or not. Scientists have made many discoveries and came up with many explanations for these questions and arguments. To this day, the Big Bang is the most believed and evidentially supported theory of the beginning of the Universe. This theory shows how the Universe was created and that there was a beginning. This theory was developed by Steven Hawking.

Read More
1784 Words | 8 Pages

The traditional claim of all Cosmological Arguments is defined as “something outside the universe is responsible to explain the existence of the universe” (PowerPoint 380). In the “causal argument,” or the First Cause Argument on the cosmological argument, “something” outside of the universe that is supposed to inform us about the existence of the universe is argued to be explained as God. As the first cause argument goes into depth and with the help of Thomas Aquinas, it is easy to see how God is responsible for explaining the existence of the universe around us. Within the first cause argument on the cosmological argument the following premises and conclusions are discussed: Premise 1: There exists things that are caused. Meaning that

Read More
1696 Words | 7 Pages

Therefore if there must be a cause for at least some things, not to assert their must be a necessary cause, leads to an infinite series of causes, and this fails to provide an definitive explanation for the existence of any contingent thing or being . The atheist, H.J. McCloskey does not claim, in his article, that such a necessary cause does not exist, for the universe as a whole or a collection of its parts, the objection is in this necessary cause as a necessary being, a creator. McCloskey states that using the causal argument the most which can be claimed is for an imperfect cause capable of causing the world we know, not a necessary being whom is a perfect omnipotent being

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

The big bang does not explain why it took place, nor how the universe was created. However, it can be argued that the big bang theory addresses the evolution of the universe, not its creation. The big bang is simply a theory. This means, that it cannot be proven, but it can be disproven. Observations and tests carried out which support the theory have made it stronger, resulting in more people willing to accept it.

Read More
1769 Words | 8 Pages

SOLUSI UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF THEOLOGY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES A report done in partial fulfillment of the course required RELT 389 SCIENCE OF ORIGINGS TERM PAPER: WEAKNESSES OF THE BIG BANG THEORY Presented By Takudzwa A Denhere ID: 2011050104 Lecturer: Mr. Sibanda The big bang theory and its history

Read More

More about How Does The Scientific Explanation For The Cause Of The Universe

Related Topics

Open Document