ipl-logo

International Humanitarian Law Analysis

772 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethical impact of nuclear weapons

Law’s application
ICJ decides based on the most relevant applicable law which consists of the provision of UN charter that related to the threat of nuclear weapon, the principle and rules of international humanitarian law, law of neutrality, and other relevant treaties on nuclear weapon. UN charter Article 2(4) for generally prohibits the threat and use of force whether it would be directed against territorial or political independence of states, it is known as unlawful aggression; the complementary to article 2(4) is article 51 regard to the rights of individual and collective self-defense if arm attack occurs, including cyber-attacks; article 42 on authorize of UNSC to take military enforcement measures on any type of weapon employed. …show more content…

The first principle is focused on the protection of civilian; states must not use civilians as the object of attack and must not use weapons that are incapable of distinguishing between civilian and military targets. In application of that second principle, States have limited freedom of choice of means in the weapons they use in order to avoid causing unnecessary suffering.
The court states that the rule and principle of humanitarian were invented before nuclear weapons were created. However, the court does not deny that the establish the rule and law of humanitarian in armed conflict does not apply to nuclear weapon, but it seems significant that it does not apply to new weaponry and upload in the present proceeding. The principle of neutrality It is similar to the fundamental character of humanitarian principle that any type of weapons might be used to all international armed conflict. This principle is brought from international Red Cross; the fact that nuclear weapons are regulated by the law of armed conflict does not necessarily mean that such recourse is …show more content…

Conventional international law
The court first surveyed Conventional international law. The use of nuclear weapon should be treated in similar manners which are prohibited under the Second Hague Declaration of 29 July 1899 to prohibit the use of projectiles which could spread the asphyxiating or deleterious gases, Hague Convention IV of 18 October 1907 to prohibit the poisoned weapon, and Geneva Protocol of 17 June 1925 to prohibit any types of harmful material or devices. However, none of these conventional provisions prohibit the use of nuclear weapon. Customary international law The court considered “opinio juris” with the connection to policy of deterrence that play the fundamental role in international security affairs, and emphasize the substance that law must be look for primarily in the actual practice from the way in which nuclear weapons have been used in the past fifty years, namely, for purposes of deterrence, from a series of General Assembly resolutions affirming the illegality of nuclear

Show More
Related
1481 Words | 6 Pages

The US heavy-handedly pressured them to refrain from nuclear exports, specifically in the German-Brazilian deal. The US’ loud voice instilled the pact set forth in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1968. Until 1974 most nations had approached nuclear weapons and civilian uses of nuclear energy separately. Both sides in outlining their grievances towards each other often used article 4. “All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.”

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

Inhuman acts have been occurring in the world since humans have been on the earth. Due to this fact we needed to have some rules to war. We all know war is brutal and hard on not only the people who are fighting but also the people who are strictly caught in the crossfire. We as a united world saw that some of the things that were happening were not ok even during the height of war. This is why the united nations created the Geneva Conventions and have continued to ratify them throughout time.

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

Talking about atomic bombs makes the hair stand up on my arms. Those words used together are very powerful and very frightening. In 1945, there were many reasonings considered in using atomic weapons and not using these atomic weapons. Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb, and that forever changed the way that people view these bombs. The morally good reason that President Truman decided to use atomic weapons is, because I believe that he believed that it would end the war quicker.

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

The care of civilians during a time of conflict has two arguments Sedgwick’s utility argument and Doctrine of Double Effect or Doctrine of Double Effect prime. I will argue for the Doctrine of Double Effect on the grounds it provide a clear view on what is considering the right actions. While Sidgwicks view allows for all actions to be consider just if framed correctly. Secondly, I will argue that Doctrine of Double Effect prime provides a greater respect to civilians by narrowing its aim. This is due to the update of the Doctrine of Double Effect by Walzer.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

Before his election to the presidency, Dwight Eisenhower sought to contain the atom’s destructive power (). Yet, in his first speech at the United Nations as President of the United States, Eisenhower argued for the normalization of the international proliferation of nuclear technology (Office of the President, 1953). The motivation behind his now famous “Atoms for Peace” speech illuminates an interesting contradiction between the obvious American nonproliferation objectives and the president’s political calculation. The key to understanding this contradiction is to separate Eisenhower’s contemporary political motivations from the consequences of the president’s choice to pursue international proliferation of peaceful nuclear technology.

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

The Atomic Bomb in WWII Unethical Dilemma Leonardo McCormick Adventist University of Health Sciences   The Atomic Bomb In WWII Unethical Dilemma As all aspects of life-threatening situations can become an unethical dilemma which are then discussed. In order to make a statement we must always be mindful to set aside our personal bias when presenting such materials.

Read More
1312 Words | 6 Pages

Would the military have a right to deploy weapons then? Not under the current terms of the treaty, no. As technology improves over the next several decades, or longer, the idea of civilian space travel is not so far-fetched. NASA is already planning a mission to Mars, and if missions see continued success, there is no doubt that States will invest their time, money, and resources to expand the space industry further. It needs time to develop before a decision can really be determined.

Read More
1742 Words | 7 Pages

Rules: With regard to international armed conflicts, the four Geneva Conventions (GC I to IV) and Additional Protocol I and II contain various provisions specifically dealing with both of Prisoners of War, Civilians protection to prevent any kind of violations that may happen toward them. The Forth Geneva convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War has set rules governing the issue of civilians who found themselves under enemy’s possession. Article 5 of the 4th GC has identified who are protected persons with putting conditions to be considered as protected with the privileges of having the statue of protected persons at article 27 of the same convention. Third Geneva Convention in particular has recognized group of rights with regarded to POWs such as the right to be humanely treated at article 13, correspondence at article 71, the right to gain a sufficient food in quantity and quality at article 26 and the right to not be subjected to torture and question at article 17 where every prisoner of war “when questioned on the subject, is bound to give only his surname, first names and rank, date of birth, and army, regimental, personal or serial number, or failing this, equivalent information” Moreover, the use of weapons and means that have indiscriminate effects such as poisonous gas and bombs which also would aggravate the suffering recognized as prohibited to use due to the amount of damage it causes upon civilians as well as the environment

Read More
1556 Words | 7 Pages

Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter states that, "all member states shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, nor in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations” . It is therefore a unilateral agreement signed by member states against the use of force when dealing each other. World events however since the signing and ratification of the UN Charter have indicated that states who are signatories to the charter continue to use force against each other for various reasons. Some 25 years after the writing and ratification of the charter one cannot doubt that states have used force and sought to justify it through individual or collective self-defence claims, as well as humanitarian claims in furtherance of national agendas and to increase territory. This no doubt may have been what frustrated Franck into the stance that Article 2(4) was in its grave.

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

In the UNSC’s article 51, individual and collective self-defense can be authorized by the UNSC under the framework of collective security. However, genocide is never justifiable in the eyes of the UN. Perhaps the most distinguishing feature between war and genocide is the disproportionally ability of those involved to fight back. Within war there is a certain level of understanding that those engaging in the conflict will have an ability to engage in battle. However, historically in genocides the effected groups have had little to no ability to proportionately fight against their attackers.

Read More
889 Words | 4 Pages

Extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction can in many circumstances be a useful and legitimate response to transnational crime. Criminal activity is not always confined to territorial boarders, and so the law may seek to follow the crime to prevent an offender from enjoying impunity. A number of states have included in their criminal legislature provisions allowing for the investigation and prosecution of international crimes, even when such crime is committed outside their national territory and whether or not the perpetrators or the victims are nationals of the state concerned”. The importance of extraterritorial jurisdiction was also seen in the Advisory Opinion of 11 April 1949 – Reparations for injuries suffered in the service of the United Nations. Personnel of the UN were targeted in Palestine which culminated in the assassination of

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

INTROCUTION To translate the R2P principles to deeds will require serious commitment from all the governments who unanimously affirmed at the 2005 World Summit Outcome that “each individual State has the responsibility to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity” (UN world summit, 2005). To relies a credible implementation, it is necessary that Paragraphs 138 and 139 of the Outcome which goes to the real issue of operationalizing the responsibility to protect (widely referred to as “R2P” in English) is sincerely adhered to by all. This brief paper will cover current R2P debate and the complex issue of implementing the R2P pillars which are: Pillar one the protection responsibilities of the State (sect. II).

Read More
1716 Words | 7 Pages

After all, the law which is inseparable from the justice is understandable as civilized communication and background for nonviolent conflict solving process. On the other hand, the war is also the way to solve conflicts, but in a different way, using the suffering and the price of life. Apparently, because everyone understands that war is extreme and unacceptable social situation, States and international society are trying to find its reasoning or justification. “The just war tradition, and the international law which follows it, is thus a middle-ground moral tradition trying to regulate armed force in a way which is fair, reasonable, and mindful of consequences.”

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

On the legal grounds, the act of humanitarian intervention is still debatable, On the one hand, there was a responsibility to limit the use of force to self-defense according to the UN Charter. On the other hand, there was strong international pressure to abide by commitments to human rights and the right to life. This has constitute tensions in an international law system, Humanitarian intervention as the justifiable act to intervene while it is contrary to the principle of sovereignty and nonintervention in the UN system and international law. An evolving international norms related to human rights and the use of force.

Read More
2404 Words | 10 Pages

Nevertheless the decisions of the court posses binding force and can be enforced under certain circumstances. They are binding upon the parties to the dispute and only in respect of that dispute. The provision to this effect is contained in article 59 of the statue of the international court of justice. Besides this article 94 of the U.N charter provides that each member of the U.N undertakes to comply with the decision of the

Read More

More about International Humanitarian Law Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document