ipl-logo

Kantian Ethical Theory Of Illegal Immigration Essay

1473 Words6 Pages

U.S Immigration
The Question to this argument is, “Was it morally right or wrong for Arizona to adopt and enforce AZ 1070 law in order to help eliminate and reduce the number of illegal immigrants in the US?” In thought this law is thought to be discriminating against one race, which in being is the Mexican-Hispanic race. Even though all the law states is that, “upon stopping someone for any other suspected legal infraction, reasonably suspect that their subject is in the country illegally. Those who cannot show documentation of legal entry will be fined… and maybe jailed…” We will be using Kantian Ethical Theory to come to a sound conclusion on the matter, which is that it was morally right for Arizona to adopt AZ 1070 into law.
Kantian Ethical theory is described and dictated solely based on logic at which no conditions can apply. The Theory is formulated on two categorical imperatives in which the first formulation is,” Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become universal law.” And the second formulation is,” Act so that you treat humanity …show more content…

This law has no ethnical discrimination as people say because it is only under the sole aspect that they do this to everyone which they all have to prove that they are citizens. Everyone in The US is given a state Driver’s License which needs to be renewed every year and even before they become of this age they are given a social security can and birth certificate. It is only under the aspect of where Arizona is that it brings discrimination in to the basis of this situation. So under Kantian there are no hypotheticals in this situation. All there is what people presume and that’s minor percent of the population according to the poll who oppose this

Show More
Related

Summary Of Jeremy Gagby Nigga Is Just A Word

113 Words | 1 Pages

Some may argue that is okay to use the N-Word because they say it is just a word. In the article of “Rules for A word” by Jeremy Gagby he say that “Nigga is a word frequently heard in school, music, and on the streets.” This is the point that some people are arguing about, the word is used in songs and kids use it all the time and this is why they do not think it is a big deal. People may think that as time passes and other meanings of this word become popular, that it is acceptable to use this word. Newer generations have a completely different use for this

Read More

Utilitarianism And Kantian Ethics

833 Words | 4 Pages

Kantians believe that the rightness or wrongness of an action does not depend on the consequences, but on whether they fulfill a duty. They must act in a way that will produce the greatest overall amount of good in the world. In this view there is no obligation to give money to a homeless person, but it is the right thing to do. Kant’s supreme moral principle is the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative is a moral law that is unconditional for all agents because of intrinsic value.

Read More

Unjust Borders: Individuals And The Ethics Of Immigration By Javier Hidalgo

1457 Words | 6 Pages

Hidalgo challenges the prevailing assumption that a person's place of birth or nationality should determine their access to opportunities and resources. He argues that such a stance is fundamentally unjust and discriminatory, and that a more inclusive understanding of human rights should transcend national borders. The author holds that immigration restrictions are systematically unjust and examines how individual actors should respond to this injustice. Additionally, individuals can rightfully resist immigration restrictions and often have strong moral reasons to subvert these laws.

Read More

The Ethicality Of Arizona Immigration Law

1376 Words | 6 Pages

In addition, it violates citizen’s rights and dignity in a manner that runs contrary to the founding principles of this nation. The Immigration law was put in place to lower the rate of illegal immigration but is ineffective and poorly designed, and will lead to long term conflict. It has had numerous negative side effects, hurting Arizona’s businesses, tourism, agriculture, education and population reduction over time causing the unemployment rate to rise tremendously. Arizona’s law is not and should not be the end of the discussion over how to resolve the issues plaguing our nation’s immigration system. Rather than imposing fifty different state immigration laws, U.S. Congress should collaborate to approve a national immigration reform policy that benefits our economy that is more realistic, and serves our nation’s long term

Read More

Personal Narrative: My Life As An Undocumented Immigrants

693 Words | 3 Pages

Although many dreamers will not be given the chance to renew and remain under the benefits of the act, there will be more attention focused on the ones with criminal records. For instance, “This means that for deportation, criminals who are undocumented will still be the priority, as well as illegal reentrants and people with outstanding orders of removal.” With the act being retained for a while, there will be more focus on those who do not have a right to remain in this

Read More

Immigration Persuasive Essay 2016

1021 Words | 5 Pages

Now President-Elect, Donald Trump, wishes to send illegal immigrants back to their home country. This has created controversy between the candidates in the election as well as the citizens of the United States. A diverse population believes that we should not grant illegal immigrants amnesty because they have broken our immigration laws. Allowing illegal immigrants citizenship is not the rule of American, legal immigration is. However, others believe that it is “inhumane” and “unrealistic” to deport over 11 million immigrants back to the native country when they have families and lives here in the United States.

Read More

Flaws Of Kant's Moral Argument

1502 Words | 7 Pages

Kant argued that morality presented itself to human agents in the form of the categorical imperative and the argument for deontology. The categorical imperative states that a person must “Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”. This is based on the age old, “do unto others as you would have them unto you”. Kant argued a person must embrace that what they do is only alright if it is

Read More

Undocumented Immigration Essay

1078 Words | 5 Pages

Undocumented immigrants live with fear of deportation every day of their lives. Those with control of state institutions who do not consider undocumented immigrants as worthy American residents in our society, take advantage of their power by instilling fear of deportation. The restrictive federal and state laws towards migration in the U.S. has become a way to keep undocumented immigrants and their families living in the shadows. Arrocha (2013) claims that the paradox of the U.S. migration seems be that our free democratic republicanism is viewed as the land of freedom, equality, and justice. Yet, these undocumented immigrants aren’t treated equally or given the freedom to live in our society without intimidation.

Read More

Kant's Deontology: The Final Ethical Theory

154 Words | 1 Pages

The final ethical theory is Kant’s deontology. Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who admire the stoics for their dedication to performing their duties and playing their part. He based his theory on duties, obligations, and rights. Its main focus is that everyone has an inherited right. It highlights the importance of respecting a person autonomy.

Read More

Essay On Unauthorized Immigration

788 Words | 4 Pages

My Thoughts on the Issue of Unauthorized Immigration and Border Control in the United States Immigration is the movement of people into a country in which they are not natives or citizens with the intention to settle in the country, especially as permanent residents or future citizens. Therefore, unauthorized immigrants are people who are referred to as undocumented immigrants, people who have no prior invitation or official documentation before entering the country. This above stated definitions of this salient words involved in this write up, will serve as personal balance on this issue. If government is a system by which a state or community is controlled, then my ideology on this issue is being influenced by the course of study which is government. As we all know that America is called the land of the free and home of the brave.

Read More

Aristotle Vs Kant

160 Words | 1 Pages

Kant’s various philosophical works and their contents are highly debated, and remain relevant in today’s society. As Kant’s discussion suggests, all humans the ability to follow the good will because of their ability to reason. However, one can suggest that some people are more inclined to follow the good will due to their individual traits. Kant proposes the categorical imperative that allows everyone to evaluate if their actions uphold the good will. Regardless of one’s position in the argument, it is apparent that moral law is applicable to all humans as rational beings, and therefore should be followed by all who possess the ability to reason.

Read More

Hume Vs Kant

2014 Words | 9 Pages

The categorical imperative is the idea that “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant, 14). After much deliberation, Kant concludes that the categorical imperative must be the only one. Afterward, Kant states the first formulation of the categorical imperative, sometimes called the formula of the law of nature, “act as if the maxim of your action were to become through your will a universal law of nature” (Kant, 30). Expounding upon this idea, Kant explains the difference between perfect(irremissible) and imperfect(meritorious) duty (Kant, 32).

Read More

Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism

1228 Words | 5 Pages

Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are two of the most notable philosophers in normative ethics. This branch of ethics is based on moral standards that determine what is considered morally right and wrong. This paper will focus on Immanuel Kant’s theory of deontology and J.S. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism. While Mill takes a consequentialist approach, focused on the belief that actions are right if they are for the benefit of a majority, Kant is solely concerned with the nature of duty and obligation, regardless of the outcome. This paper will also reveal that Kantian ethics, in my opinion, is a better moral law to follow compared to the utilitarian position.

Read More

Principles of Kant's Ethical Theory

843 Words | 4 Pages

KANT’S ETHICAL THEORY Introduction Immanuel Kant(1724-1804) was German philospher who was the opponent of utilitarianism and supported the Deontological Theory. Kant believed that certain types of actions were absolutely prohibited, even in cases where the action would bring about more happiness than the alternative. For Kantians, there are two questions that we must ask ourselves whenever we decide to act: (i) Can I rationally will that everyone act as I propose to act? If the answer is no, then we must not perform the action. (ii) (ii) Does my action respect the goals of human beings rather than merely using them for my own purposes?

Read More

Basic Principle Deontological Analysis

929 Words | 4 Pages

Kant believes that most people know right from wrong; the problem most people have is not in knowing what is morally, but in doing it. Kant also argued that rightness or wrongness of particular acts is determined by rules; these rules could be determined by his principle of universalizability. He also argued reason require not only that moral duties be universal but also absolutely binding. For instance, when lying is the only option to save someone’s life, still we shall not lie for it is morally wrong to lie. Kant introduced categorical imperative which states that people ought to do something regardless of the consequences.

Read More

More about Kantian Ethical Theory Of Illegal Immigration Essay

Related Topics

Open Document