People should pursue justice, which is to help order the society. Once Francis Bacon said, “If we do not maintain justice, justice will not maintain us.” It means that if we do not maintain justice, then we will lose everything including life because of injustice. It can destroy us and the whole society. I strongly agree with this quote because people are often in danger because they do not follow justice.
“By assuming other people should be treated the way I want to be treated, it imposes my preferences and values on those around me”(Does The Golden). Essayist and writer for the New York Times Magazine, Chuck Klosterman, explains in his article Does The Golden Rule Hold Up in Modern Society why the “Golden Rule” may actually be not so golden after all. Klosterman explains why assuming that people want the same things and think that the same actions are moral is simply irrational. He states, “Well, I certainly want to be treated in a manner that accounts for the possibility that other people can’t predict what I want”(Does The Golden). I interpret this to mean that he wants to be treated as a unique person who has his own morals and values.
Percy Jackson has had ADHD and dyslexia all his life and been kicked out of countless schools-accept this time it’s not his fault. An evil math teach transform into a furry and attacks him, he kills it with a pen( that transform into a sword) that his teacher gives to him. He goes home to his mom and abusive stepdad, he goes on vacation and his car is attack and his mom tells him he not normal-he’s a demigod half mortal half god and there is a safe haven called camp half-blood and monsters can smell him because his god side. The monster kidnaps his mom and in revenge he kills the monster right by the camp.
The article The Unexpected Power of Random Acts of Kindness by Catherine Pearson accurately discusses the golden rule by showing that random acts of kindness have a way greater effect than most people would think. Erin Alexandra who experienced a random act of kindness during a hard time said “But the warmth of that small and unexpected gesture, from a stranger who had no inkling of what she was going through, moved her deeply.” This illustrates that small acts of kindness can make a huge difference in how someone feels. Another example of how powerful
The Golden Rule says to treat others the same way one would want to be treated. The Golden Rule can be achieved when equality and Civil Rights are being used between a group of people. An example is when a person is treated unfairly. Instead of attacking the other person they would try and solve it peacefully knowing that physical actions are unnecessary choices that will only make problems worse. The ideas of equality are neutral choices or actions set on two groups or more.
In the story “Harrison Bergeron” they try to attempt to make a utopia by making each other look equal. Have you ever cut someone off in traffic, or didn’t call somebody back because you don’t like them? That’s just how our bodies and mind are, it would be impossible to make everybody in your utopia to not do bad things. The golden rule means to treat others the way you want to be treated, but there are some jerks in the world and selfish people. There is nothing we can do about it and it just teaches us how to be human beings.
Next, it is presumed that this maxim directly compels an action, thereby treating it like it is purely rational. This maxim is then translated into a universal law of nature for all rational beings and observed. If the universalization of a maxim creates a contradiction, it is morally impermissible because continuing to act upon it is then essentially treating oneself as an exception. For example, some people operate off of the maxim that lying is okay when it is more convenient than telling the truth. When lying out of convenience is translated into a universal law, it immediately creates a logical contradiction.
4. As ethical concern, the Heritage must have told Phibro about typo. In this case, there is no evidence that they had agree whether $00.1 or $0.1 provision, but if there were evidence, Heritage would lose. In addition, Kant argues about Kant's categorical imperative, "An act is only ethical if it would be acceptable for everyone to do the same thing."
Kant’s principal of ends requires that we treat people as ends or as things of worth in themselves, but never simply as means or things valuable only as ways of gaining something that we may value. Now it is not morally wrong to treat a person as both a means and an end, but to use a person solely as a means to gain something valued is morally wrong. With that said I do think this principle could be a useful moral principle for everyday life. Let’s say as an example of this principal that I had a girlfriend
“Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”. This idea had been around for a long time through many teachings of religion. The phrase has evolved from “ Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” to “treat others the way you want to be treated”. Although Kant believed that people should think logically rather than religiously, Kant believed that religion had a good foundation for societies. One of the ten commandment reads “thou shalt not steal”.
In this particular assignment, we as a class were presented with a scenario, in which two adults involved in an extramarital affair became witnesses in a murder. The dilemma facing both John and Martha is whether or not to report to the authorities that the suspect they have in custody was not the individual they witnessed committing the murder. Coming forward, however, would uncover their illicit affair and most likely destroy their respective families. In the essay, I will defend what would be Immanuel Kant’s solution to this moral predicament posed by Martha and John’s actions because it contributes the most to living a worthwhile ethical life in this situation, when compared with the other philosophers we’ve discussed this semester. Nevertheless, before this, I will first show how Bentham and Aristotle would resolve the above dilemma.
There are different internal compasses that people utilize to point them towards the path of morality. The most common that probably still remains is The Golden Rule also referred to as the ethic of reciprocity. The Golden Rule stands for: “Treat others the way you want to be treated”. Some consider the Golden Rule to be the most universal of moral principles. Yet it does not always send a positive message.
It tells people not to make an exception of themselves and to avoid contradictions. The formula of humanity tells people to respect the inherent dignity and worth in themselves and in other people. Using these two rules, Kant would say that the maxim could be if a person does not want to help others, then they do not. If this action were to
On page nine and ten of the first chapter of The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals by Immanuel Kant, he discusses the propositions that he believes make up a moral decision. Kant believes that a moral decision is based on an individual’s principle. He defines a principle as one’s reason for acting. According to Kant, a moral decision is when an individual ignores their personal feelings, or what they want to do, and do something only because it is what they “should” or “ought to” do.
The Critique of Pure Reason in 1787. The Critique of Practical Reason, 1788 and the Metaphysics of Morals of 1797. The Critique of Judgment (Kritik der Urteilskraft, the third Critique) applied the Kantian 1790 system to aesthetics and teleology.
