They believe under the wrong impression that writings which incorporate topics like “Plato, Shakespeare, the French Revolution, and nuclear fission” are the only sources of scholarly work. Graff emphasizes the nonexistent linkage between the subject of the paper and the educational value that society has mistakenly thought to exist. Instead, that truly defines the educational weight is the writer’s own stake into the writing of any topic. Graff asserts that the individual’s own interest and devotion to analyzing and offering his or her own viewpoint is what produces scholarly work and having intellectual discussions. In his experience in the sports world, his dedication to staying aware of the “arguments, debates, problems for analysis, and intricate statistics” has allowed for more intellectual discussions than what can be had at
In Loye Youngs's essay, “Is Humiliation an Ethically Appropriate Response to Plagiarism?” Loye Young claims that the action he took against students who plagiarized is valid. He justifies his claim by listing his moral beliefs and using an example of Senator Joseph Biden plagiarism story. Six students were caught for a common act, they all submitted a plagiarized paper. Loye Young states that even after a well-reviewed and clear syllabus he is "surprised by how common and blatant plagiarism turned out to be" (Young, 191).
He continues this theory by stating that if students were to begin with subjects that interest them they could more easily evolve into intellectuals who read challenging writing (245). I agree with this idea because if students begin reading about things that interest them they may realize that reading is not such a ghastly thing contrary to what they may have originally thought. Graff believes that students will produce higher quality material if they write about their interests. By stating his own personal anecdote, he gives even more insight on how students can become intellectuals by practicing his ideas (245). After reading his anecdote, I became more of a believer in the idea Graff presents in his essay.
Laurel high School is an academic establishment that has it’s fair share of rules concerning academic integrity. However, the honor codes on certain practice, particularly cheating, are not thoroughly enforced. I propose that my school should revise its policies on cheating to ensure that students are earning the grades they deserve and not achieving through academic dishonesty. As aforementioned, Laurel already has an honor code for cheating. The general policy is that as a consequence, the students involved should be punished and their grades put in jeopardy.
My schooling and upbringing have reinforced the importance of honestly and integrity. This year, in AP Research, we spent a number of classes discussing plagiarism and how to avoid it — some students, in paraphrasing the ideas of others and forgetting to cite correcting, have accidentally committed the act of plagiarism. As a result, I have learned the importance of citing correctly. I have also learnt how to clearly distinguish to readers what points were products of my own thinking, and what ideas were created and presented by others. Putting in countless citations is laborious and tedious, but ultimately worth the effort: plagiarism should be avoided at all costs.
Professor Doom is able to show how a students “no big deal” mindset behind cheating can lead to a detrimental effect of the school perceptions being changed and a hardworking student’s degree virtually meaning nothing but a sheet of paper. The trends of students participating in cheating is growing on college campuses and isn 't coming to a downward slope anytime soon. It is mentioned by Doom that
The nature of cheating originates from the common misconception of helping others and a student’s lack of self-confidence. Plagiarism, not so different from cheating, disperses from the broad range of information on today’s technology. Through an authentic study, it has been revealed that teachers have established many students who have cheated their way through complexed assignments. Even misleading students who have kept a high grade point average has been found as participants of academic dishonesty. Today, professors seek to find different measures that should be taken to decrease cheating and plagiarism.
Specifically, two authors, Edward W. Byrn and H. G. Wells, discusses their own opinion consisting between the thought
In her discussion she talked about how easy it is to plagiarism
People wonder what is so wrong with cheating or plagiarism. As long as they get the work done or pass the course. But do these students know the real consequences of cheating and plagiarism. Viewing different people aspect of this problem, this happens everywhere. In Brent Staples article “Cutting and Pasting: A senior thesis by (Insert Name)”, he is trying to get through to individuals so that they could stop doing this and the consequences.
Though the student implemented modifications to the paper (tweaking of words, change in sentence structure, etc.), the teacher noted that the majority of the paper was copied verbatim. The teacher affirmed that she had found incriminating evidence of the plagiarism and thus, scheduled to meet with the student. When confronted, the student alleged that he was uncertain as to how cite the passage. By choosing to do so anyway, the student demonstrated poor judgment. Professor Thomas outlines this particular scenario to demonstrate the difficulties in discussing and teaching about academic integrity in school.
By definition plagiarism is “the act of taking someone else’s work and trying to pass it off as if it were your own.” There are many different types of plagiarism, such as having someone write a paper for you, copying somers paper or just copying something right from the internet. Plagiarism is wrong in many ways because if you are caught you are only hurting yourself. You hurt yourself by having teachers or professors question who you really are. Plagiarism is cheating.
Both sociologists used their own theories and related it to “working-class” and “middle-class” students and attempted to discuss how factors such as language for example, can have an affect on social
One of the most crucial traits a scholar can develop is a high level of self-efficacy which is essential to academic success. The ability to achieve and to recognize that success can come from being industrious should be the deterring factor for a student who considers committing the act of plagiarism. What is plagiarism one might ask? Voelker, Love & Pentina (2012) define plagiarism as, “putting forward another’s work as your own” (p. 37). This very pervasive problem plagues the education system, and many researchers and psychologist seek to explain the driving force behind students’ academic dishonesty.
