Legal And Ethical Implications Of Cross-Cultural Leadership

706 Words3 Pages

Legal and Ethical Implications of Cross-Cultural Leadership
Introduction
This is the fourth and final entry of my journal. In this segment, I will provide an analysis of the scores I received in assessing the legal and ethical implications of cross-cultural leadership. I will provide insight about my pattern of ethical decision making in addition to providing an analysis of how the answers of the assessment may be different in a particularistic culture? In conclusion, this paper will provide a summary of the learnings I have obtained about the legal and ethical implication of cross-cultural leadership from this experience, and other readings and research.
What was your score on this assessment? Upon completing the Ethical Assessment, I …show more content…

Therefore, I am more of a Universalist with a hint of Particularism when it comes to ethical decision making. I value relationships but believe that rules are in place for a reason. I am a rule follower, and it’s the leader’s responsibility to ensure that their subordinates are following the rules and regulations of the organization. The United States is a power-driven country and those in charge have no problem flexing their power. We are a me, myself and I society, and these traits have often manifested in the work environment. As a result, I realize that when answering the questions of this assessment. I thought about how the choices of these ethical dilemmas would affect me. There is a consequence to every action. As a manager or supervisor what would be the consequences of not enforcing company rules? In organizations in which I previously worked in, such actions could result in termination, therefore, in the United Stated work environment we are somewhat forced to develop Universalistic …show more content…

Therefore, particularism work very well in these settings, and trust is placed in individuals. However, in the American culture there is a clear distinction between personal relationships and work relationship, and in this environment, trust is placed in the system. A system that governs the consequences the of mistrust in the workplace (Tan, Yang & Veliyath, 2009). Regardless of these distinctions, the primary objectives of managers and supervisors is decrease the risks associated in ethical decision making. The focus should be on what’s best for the environment and all involved (Tan, Yang & Veliyath,