ipl-logo

Manuscripts Don T Burn Essay

662 Words3 Pages

If you could erase one person from human history, who would it be? Why? - 83 “Manuscripts don’t burn.” – The Devil, “Master and Margarita”. This quote most aptly summarizes the point I will be defending in this essay. History is shaped not by people, but by manuscripts – by ideas. These can’t develop independently – they are shaped by the world around them, by the trends and forces of history. If one considers all factors at play, their formation is a foregone conclusion. Martin Luther did not singlehandedly create Protestantism, the systemic failures of the church did. One can’t destroy the idea by erasing the man who wrote the popular book on it – one will just create another writer. People burn, ideas don’t. The best one can do is …show more content…

Along with the progress achieved by the Labour movement in Britain this would lead to a shift towards social democracy and the idea that socialism should develop naturally, as is the case in modern day Scandinavia. In a world without Lenin, socialism would not have the negative connotations of the Gulags, and would return to its humanistic roots. Moreover, this exercise in remodeling history does not exist in a vacuum. It gives us a principle which should be adopted the real world as well. The stakeholders in this are not only the millions now hypothetically not dead as a result of Leninism or the better-off poor of an alternative universe; but real people, made of flesh and blood, which are dying as a result of misinterpreted ideas. We topple oppressive governments and kill tyrants like Gadhafi, but this only turns them into martyrs, and fails to show where they went wrong with their ideas. I am not advocating to leave them be, instead we should do the only thing we as humans can against the tides of history and discredit their ideas from within – deny

Show More
Related
522 Words | 3 Pages

Revolutionists explanation of October Revolution is based on the importance of the force of the masses which created the revolutionary nature of the society leading to cardinal reforms. Lenin was indeed a key figure and the Bolshevik party was able to meet the demand of the masses which raised their popularity. This view shows a direct conflict between a revolutionist and liberal ‘totalitarian’ schools that implements Lenin and Stalin as the only people that caused terror and emplaced control over

Read More
1177 Words | 5 Pages

During the Russian Revolution, Lenin was the first Marxist leader of Russia from 1917-1924. For him, democracy was a form of the State, and in turn, a form of oppression. He believed that democracy was a way to make the people of Russia compliant. He saw Parliament as mask for the government, and that officials would make it seem like they were doing good for the public but end up going behind closed doors to make official changes in their favor. This is something he wanted to change.

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

Lenin enforced the communist regime and was inspired by ruling through fear. Harris (2013) clarifies Lenin’s methods by displaying his approaches to keeping control of his country. This meant that Lenin “viewed terror as a legitimate and necessary instrument of political struggle” (Harris, 2013: 50). Harris showcases Lenin’s methods of controlling his population through fear by establishing “the Gulag system, mass deportation, mass strengthening of the Soviet Police State” (Harris, 2013: 53). Lenin was responsible for the formation of the Gulag system which was a series of labour camps located in various areas of Russia.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

Vladimir Lenin was a prominent yet controversial figure of the 20th century; he founded the Bolshevik party and crafted the 1917 Socialist Revolution in Russia. The Bolsheviks strived to destruct the Tsarist regime and instead sought the establishment of a socialist state. Consequently, Lenin was the first leader of the Soviet Union. Politically, socially and economically, Lenin used socialism and its influence to avail the Russian population out of the abysmal environment of which they resided. Lenin had an immense influence in the turn of the 20th century including his leadership of the Bolshevik revolution from the first communist state in history.

Read More
219 Words | 1 Pages

Although initially voiced by Karl Marx, communism or Marxism was executed with tremendous flaws by Russian political leader, Vladimir Lenin, in a series of revolutions and campaigns including that of the Bolshevik revolution. Marx’s and Lenin’s goals, however, were the same in their desires to abolish

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

“The goal of socialism is communism,” a quote by Vladimir Lenin that in six words may challenge to summarize Warren Lerner’s “A History of Socialism and Communism in Modern Times.” In this book Lerner provides an informational device for readers to learn and understand the history of socialism and communism in addition to the roles that theorists, activists, and humanists had in the creation of such. The book incorporates the aspects pertaining to the history including honorable mentions of the events that took place leading to and during the formation, groups that were focused on, and individual persons that helped form the ideology of what it was perceived of in the past and what it is seen as today. Lerner makes the purpose of his work to go in depth about the early beginnings of socialism and communism and how it later on ventured on past

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

Although Karl Marx died x number of years before the Russian Revolution, he still had a major impact on the event. Joseph Stalin, leader of the Soviet Union, discovered Karl Marx’s theories and philosophies, which inspired him to adopt several of Marx’s philosophies. The most popular of Marx’s political statements that Stalin embraced was Capitalism and Marxism. Marx referred to Capitalism as a system where a society was based off strenuous labor in order to earn an income, whereas Marxism was based off of the idea that there would be a world socialist revolution. Without Karl Marx’s observations and compositions, the Russian Revolution may not have occurred.

Read More
316 Words | 2 Pages

As for Lenin’s ideology one source that has provided significant information for my paper is author Victor Sébastien’s unique look at Lenin through letters documents and interviews. Lenin's personal letters and those of many leading political figure were made available to view, Sebestyen gives a compelling analysis that conceived a story of how Lenin came to power and ran his rebellious state. During this time violence and tyranny and corruption where the norm in Russia which prompted Lenin to sanction the deaths of many who were perceived as enemies. Lenin devised a plan based on the idea that political terror was justified.

Read More
1388 Words | 6 Pages

“Leninism is constituted, above all, as a more or less systematic set of orientations towards the seizure of state power, the conceptualization of the post-revolutionary proletarian state, and the exercise of state power (Vanaik1995, 3076)”. When Lenin took power in 1917, he did so in believing that the new government in charge was not worthy to take over Russia. However, the new government that overthrew the emperor of Russia was a democratic one. By the time of Lenin's death “soviet democracy no longer existed” the people had been forced into a new form of government one ruled by the state (Vanaik 1995, 3076). Marx did not want to force any group or state into Communism, he believed that the mass would they would rise up and take control.

Read More
1702 Words | 7 Pages

During his time, Karl Marx perceived the triumph of the bourgeoisie over the aristocratic class. He believed that it was both indispensable and foreordained that the working class would overthrow the capitalist class and engender an egalitarian socialist society. Marx believed that all workers regardless of nationality or ethnicity had the same interest in effecting a world socialist revolution. Lenin was

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

Lenin’s vision of communism is similar to Václev Havel’s reading, Living in Truth. Like Lenin, Havel believes communism is also no longer the future. The text expresses that the modern ideologies and politics are antiquated and need change. Havel wanted the citizens to stop living their life’s in a lie and start “Living in Truth”. In order for there to be a new society with new rules and laws the “ordinary people” must change first.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

However, for Lenin the working class was incapable of achieving socialism and then communism without leaders. The transition from capitalist society, developing towards a communist society, is impossible without a ‘political transition period’ ” (6). We can see these stages that occur after capitalism: socialism and communism in Zamyatins’ We when D-503 refers to the ancient world. However, Lenin makes the observation that it is impossible to refer to the ancient contemporary world when factors are still brought up in the present “rationale” period.

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

When the time came, and Lenin felt that it is suitable to take action, it can be argued that he did not look at Marx for answers, but due to his practical nature, preferred looking at the state that Russia was in, and based his actions on that. This was because Lenin felt that the world had changed since Marx’s time, primarily due to the development of

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

Karl Marx was a German philosopher and economist in the 18th century. He is known for his book the Communist Manifesto that was published in 1848. Marx believed that a revolution of the working classes would over throw the capitalist order and creates a classless society. The Industrial Revolutions led to the proletarianization; his partner Friedrich Engels explained why the changes created by the proletarianization of the worker would develop into a huge problem for industrial societies. I do believe that Karl Marx’s vision of communism in the Communist Manifesto could re-emerge as a popular and workable philosophy of social, economic, and political organization.

Read More
1486 Words | 6 Pages

Karl Marx (1818-1883) considered himself not to be a sociologist but a political activist. However, many would disagree and in the view of Hughes (1986), he was ‘both – and a philosopher, historian, economist, and a political scientist as well.’ Much of the work of Marx was political and economic but his main focus was on class conflict and how this led to the rise of capitalism. While nowadays, when people hear the word “communism”, they think of the dictatorial rule of Stalin and the horrific stories of life in a communist state such as the Soviet Union, it is important not to accuse Marx of the deeds carried out in his name.

Read More

More about Manuscripts Don T Burn Essay

Related Topics

Open Document