PART FOUR: INTEGRATION AND CONCLUSION
For my MBTI, I believe that I am an ISXJ. I believe this because for every duality, besides feeling versus thinking, everyone agreed with me. For extroversion versus introversion, everyone mostly agreed that I have a strong preference for introversion. For sensing versus intuition, everyone agreed that I have a moderately more preference for sensing. The next dimension, thinking versus feeling, was the one duality where there were a range of answers. Me and my classmate both scored more for feeling. My co-worker gave me a score that showed I strongly prefer thinking and my sister gave me an X, showing I don’t have a preference. Due to the range of the scores, I decided it was best to meet in the middle, thus giving myself a score of X. Finally, for the duality of judgement versus perception, everyone agreed that I have a stronger preference for judgement.
For my supportive communication scores, everyone
…show more content…
In the MBTI, I believe that there was a blind spot when I stated that I initiate conversation. I believe this is due to me behaving differently with strangers, compared to me initiating conversation with friends. Due to this, I gave myself a score that did not match everyone else. In addition, there was a hidden area when I stated that I like open-ended versus definite. I believe that I prefer definite, however this could be an area where I act differently when I am supposed to be professional, and when I am at home. This is why everyone else could think that I prefer open-ended. This is evident, as my sister’s example was only that I enjoy conspiracies, which is only one aspect of whether I prefer definite or open-ended. Finally, there is another hidden area, where I do prefer sentimental people over logical people, however I do not like disclosing that part of myself so I wear a