ipl-logo

Monsanto Ethical Responsibility

1071 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethics in business environment

As a consumer, it is wise to be informed about what someone would put in their body. If a doctor prescribes a new medication to a patient it would be smart to look up the drug and learn about it and everything used to make it. So why not do the same with food? Most healthy eaters check the nutrition label and ingredients on most foods they buy, but what about the companies that don’t put accurate labels on their products and the safety inspectors that do not do their job?
Big companies should not be able to control what the public knows about its product when it comes to safety and nutrition. In the film Food, Inc. by Robert Kenner in 2008, one part talks about how big food companies have fought for rights to not have to put labels on their products and hide all of the nutrition and ingredient facts. Also …show more content…

Monsanto has caused a lot of problems for farmers. Basically controlling them and with Monsanto being a multinational and multimillion dollar organization makes it impossible for small farmers to fight back so they have to lay down and let Monsanto bully them. Monsanto controls how farming is done and is the leading producer of genetically engineered seed. They have had lawsuits over what they’re doing to plants and some of their product. With the power this corporation has financially and politically they have a very big curtain to hide what they’re really doing to and what they have been putting in their products making it almost impossible to know what is in it. Also since they have power within the FDA, Monsanto is not being regulated as they should be. In one article it states, “In some instances, these resources are not available in a format that is usable and readily accessible to PHIs, or the information is not targeted to their needs.” (par. 4). Here Pham is talking about how some health inspectors do not even have the right resources available to them for one to even do his or her

Show More
Related
271 Words | 2 Pages

On the off chance that there's anything you read – or offer – let this be it. The substance of this article can possibly drastically move the world in an assortment of positive ways. Furthermore, as Monsanto would love for this article to not become famous online, whatever we can ask is that you share, offer, share the data being exhibited so it can reach however many individuals as could be expected under the circumstances.

Read More
225 Words | 1 Pages

In the article entitled Monsanto's Harvest of Fear, Donald L. Barley and James B. Steele demonstrate that Monsanto already dominates the United States food chain with their genetically modified seeds. They are currently targeting milk production which is just as scary as the corporation's legal battles against the small farmers. This situation leads to a history of toxic infections or diseases. There were many disagreements between Gary Rinehart and a stranger about the innovative seeds. They were under surveillance and an investigator came in the picture.

Read More
1447 Words | 6 Pages

Food companies jump through meticulous hoops just for the reason of withholding nutritional information from their customers. “These companies fight, tooth and nail, against labeling. The fast food industry fought against giving you the calorie information. They fought against telling you if there is trans-fat in your food. The meat packing industry for years prevented country-of-origin labeling.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

The opponents of this proposal were wrong in that compromising food quality and mislabeling for more money does not outweigh the public’s interest in their

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

The labels we see in our foods at grocery stores are not honest. The big companies put information that will make customers buy their product. In the essay “Don’t Blame the Eater”, written by David Zinczenko focuses on how bad customers are being informed about the food they consume. Zinczenko states “They would do well to protect themselves, and their customers, by providing the nutrition information people need to make informed choices about their products. Without such warnings we’ll see more sick, obese children and more angry, litigious parents,” (464).

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

"When the FDA analyzed the Obamacare menu labeling rule, it acknowledged the competitiveness of the restaurant industry, consumer demand for nutrition information, and the fact that nutrition information is provided to restaurant patrons." (The Heritage Foundation). This quote clearly shows that the market is working as intended; in other words, when the consumers asked for nutritional information, they did not get it. Instead, they got employees who knew about the information. In Fahrenheit 451, they keep information away from their citizens as well.

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

It has slowly began to change as basic information like nutrition facts, sugar, and allergens that could possibly make a person sick that have been provided with these foods. The factor that is left unknown is the processing and making of the foods. Our government is keeping it hidden, which means there must be an unsatisfying reason why. The Food and Drug Administration, under labeling and nutrition, stated, “Food labeling is required for most prepared foods, such as breads, cereals, canned and frozen foods, snacks, desserts, drinks, etc. Nutrition labeling for raw produce (fruits and vegetables) and fish is voluntary” (par. 1).

Read More
1731 Words | 7 Pages

New regulations, an enforced code of ethics and striving to be more socially responsible has led Monsanto to enhance their relationships with stakeholders. Monsanto wrote a pledge to inform all of their

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

Several acts have been passed that protect the safety and health of United States Consumers. The Food and Drug act of 1906 requires that there be unity and uniformity among food and drug products, and restricts the sale of hazardous goods. The Food Code of 2013 sets standards for food processing. The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ensures that products are not only safe for consumers, but that they are also fully aware of the goods they are buying. These acts beginning in 1906, have protected the public’s health, and prevented illness for over 100 years.

Read More
394 Words | 2 Pages

After learning about Monsanto’s past involvement in the dumping of harmful PCBs, a myriad of ethical concerns arise when examining Monsanto’s genetically modified soybeans. A serious issue is whether or not genetically modified crops (GMCs) are safe for human consumption; thus, making it unclear if GMCs are good or bad. This is especially frightening when considering that the FDA is supposed to require changes in food products to “[meet] the criteria of reasonable certainty of no harm, but when you genetically engineer a food which can cause untold differences in that plant, they don’t require anything.” (Robin, 2008, (3)) As a result, Monsanto’s soybeans were allowed on the market despite inadequate testing and served as a complement the “Round Up” herbicide.

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

The customers have a right to know what is in their food. Packaged food in the grocery store has nutrition information in it by law so that people know what they are consuming. There is little difference between that and the food in resturants besides the cooking. The ingredients are the same and, while cooking does change the nutritional values, many common processes have known effects on nutritional value. Just as people have the choice to know what is in the food that they buy from the grocery store, they should be able to find out what is in the food they buy from resturants.

Read More
287 Words | 2 Pages

So why can’t restaurants have the same information one should know. In paragraph three it say’s, ”It’s the law to include this information on all packaging, regardless of whether or not the food is healthful or not.” It also says in paragraph three,”so it makes no sense to deny the consumer the same information when dining out.” When consumers have this important

Read More
1750 Words | 7 Pages

This source has helped my research a lot because the survey they put on this source states how many people want to live a healthier lifestyle but cannot because they have trouble understanding what foods are healthy and what aren 't because they don 't understand what is being said on the nutrition labels. This source also states that these confusing nutrition labels don 't just make it hard for people who are dieting but it also hard for people who have allergies or sensitivity to some types of foods. The nutrition labels don 't state clear enough of what is actually being processed into the food. I also chose this source because it says that ingredients are a major part in how consumers pick their foods. On most food labels the ingredients are so small that most people cannot see what it says.

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

Since those major corporations run the industry, farmers can sometimes be forced to grow genetically modified soybeans, “little mention there of the 250,000 poor farmers who took their own lives in the Indian cotton belt because they became indebted due to this “frontier technology” not delivering the results that the GMO industry has said it would. It is easy to thus conclude that if there is a ‘disgusting enemy’ it is the profiteering corporate-controlled terminator seed technology of the GMO industry that has resulted in mass suicides and the destruction of traditional farmer-controlled agricultural practices developed over thousands of years” (Todhunter). Thus, the production of GM foods have left farmers in debt, or worst case, cost them their lives. The GM corporations push farmers to utilize the technology, but neglect to tell them how much it actually costs to use it. Farmers have to pay for the seeds, which can not be used again after their harvest, so they have to purchase more GM seeds and any other pesticides that have to be used in order to yield the crops.

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

As Monsanto is a multinational company whose products are consumed by the food industry, it has to strictly emphasize on its moral obligations concerning the society where their products are being sold. Such moral obligation includes providing best quality of seeds to the consumers and betterment of farmer’s life (Stern, 2011). For this purpose Monsanto ensures high yielding properties of their seeds and it would prevent against insects eating their precious crops. This would ease the farmers in keeping their crops safe and reduce their hassle to sprinkle pesticides for crop safety. On the contrary these genetically modified seeds reported in causing health related issues on consuming the food grown from them.

Read More

More about Monsanto Ethical Responsibility

Related Topics

Open Document