Trooper Doherty stated that he asked Tiffany Taylor about their travel itinerary and the odor. He added that Tiffany Taylor stated that they were coming from Atlantic City, NJ, celebrating her birthday and that she had one drink early in the evening. He further stated that Tiffany Taylor advised that she was headed back to Roselle, NJ.
When the child told the adult neighbor what happened, she called Mrs. Bryant; Mrs. Bryant told the neighbor she didn’t have time for that and hung the phone up. The reporter stated Lakirah called her grand father and he came to pick her up. Ms. Cullop stated that Lakirah stayed with her grandfather for the night and when her mother got off this morning she went to pick the child up. The reporter stated when the child and her mother got home, Mrs. Bryant whipped her with the same strap and Mr. Bryant, punched her down stairs, and threw a metal trash can at her. Ms. Cullop stated law enforcement was called to the school to take the child’s statement and they have also taken pictures of Lakirah’s bruises.
June 12th 4:30 p.m. CSW Anderson arrived at the residence and met with Wayne Lowes (father), Joann Lowes (mother) and child, Wayne Lowes ( goes by Eddie) CSW Anderson advised the Lowes of the report received and Mr. Lowes permitted CSW Anderson to interview Eddie independently. Eddie stated two nights ago he was prolonging to wash the dishes and his father got mad at him; Eddie stated he has a smart mouth; Eddie stated his does not do things immediately because his father is demanding; Eddie stated he would get mouthy with his father; Eddie stated his father came into the kitchen pulled him by his hair; Eddie stated the two struggled and his father slapped him on his face three times; Eddie stated his father choked him for about 2 to 3 minutes; Eddie stated it was difficult for him to breathe; Eddie stated his mother interfered and the struggle ceased. Eddie stated he does not get along with his father; Eddie stated they often get into physical; Eddie stated he is not upset at his father; Eddie said he was not harmed from the struggle; Eddie stated he feel safe living with mother and
Pamela told me that David mentioned that he was touched inappropriately during one of their visits together. The allegations resulted in a Special Investigator being sent out to the sister’s home where the boys currently stay. Special Investigator Jim O’Brian determined the allegations were not true. The investigator also mentioned that he had a feeling that the mom made it up due to some of the things the boys told him. When the allegations regarding the sexual abuse did not result in the boys being returned t to Pamela’s custody, she continued to allege the abuse occurred.
I responded to Troy Regional Medical Center in reference to an assault call. Upon arrival, I made contact with Roseline Jackson in room 9. Jackson stated that her and her baby daddy got into a physical altercation around 13:00 on this date. Jackson stated that she was picking their son up from Bean mother house and that’s when Bean asked to borrow her car. Bean got mad because Jackson wouldn’t let him use it.
Bob Brecher’s argument is centered around being a counter-claim to Dershowitz’ Ticking Bomb scenario. The counter-claim argues that a ticking bomb scenario, as described by Dershowtiz, is unlikely to occur in the real world, due to the difficulty in apprehending a terrorist after the terrorist plot has been set in motion, but has not yet been fully executed. Even if the authorities are lucky enough to apprehend the suspect before the ticking bomb has been set to detonate, it is improbable that torture would result in the suspect revealing the plot before the bomb goes off. Brecher additionally argues that Dershowitz’ idea of using legalized torture warrants to limit torture would, on the contrary, lead to the abuse of the torture warrant system.
Collier appears to have good intentions when she argues her case for changing the juvenile system; however, her argument seems to be limited to her own experiences and a handful of statistics to support her cause. Collier’s argument seems to balance on the belief that juvenile criminals will be deterred by harsher punishment, a notion that has been shown not to be true. When provided with the appropriate measures, juveniles have been shown to avoid recidivism at a rate that is significantly higher than juveniles sentenced through adult court. Collier is right when she argues for updating the juvenile justice system; however, her solution is far from correct when one considers the moral implications of sentencing, young, still developing minds
Many people seem to seek to fame and glory, however, some of the heroes we do not recognize are those who save the day, but whose stories are not told. Martha Montez had gone to work early on a summer morning to direct the morning shift and produce as many cards as she could. She had reported to her boss’, Lynn Gill, office and followed all directions to make sure the cards would be produced good and fast enough. Her luck would soon change and she would soon have the office to herself.
The author, Jan Librach argues that the demonstration of force that was used to conquer the nation of Ukraine, was the beginning stages of Russia’s conquest to suppress the surrounding nations of Eastern Europe, creating the surge of Russia’s determination for preservation of its empire and destroying nationalism throughout the countries they possessed authoritarian rule. Librach proves the argument by providing evidence of demand for independence by the Ukrainian Central Rada (council), for the nation of Ukraine after the news of the Russian Revolution spread throughout the world. He provides a quote from the document, “Communist Take Over & Occupation of Ukraine” from the Select Committee on Communist Aggression, which provides documentation
On 10/26/15 Ms. Calhoun visited Deven at the detention center where he’s being detained. The reporter stated when interviewing the child, she witnessed his right eye was swollen with a dark mark under it. According to the reporter, Deven wrote a detailed statement of grievance that gives a detail account of an altercation between him and Officer Kennedy on 10/23/15. In the detailed statement, Deven described the incident as follow: Deven states he asked Officer Kennedy if he could go to his room and was told to have a seat. Officer Cole gave Deven permission to go to his cell and as he waited at his cell door for it to be opened, Officer Kennedy told the child to have a seat.
While the choice of whether to remain loyal to the crown or join the revolution became popular in the late eighteenth century, two men, Jonathan Boucher and Thomas Paine, decided to voice their beliefs and later became well known for their arguments. Though Boucher stated strong points about why remaining loyal to Great Britain was the correct choice, Paine’s argument was more appealing because he clarified that America would offer various inviting benefits that Britain was not able to provide. Paine compelled people because of the clarity in his argument. He avoided utilizing language that people were incapable of understanding, and he made his points sound appealing by using “a new style of political writing” (#31, p.95). Paine informed
In this paper, I will focus on Bonnie Steinbock’s claim on whether or not we should give equal moral consideration to species outside our own species group. I will first determine what moral concern means, according to Peter singer, and explain how he views the human treatment of animals. I will then outline Steinbock’s argument against Singer’s position and explain how her criticism is part of a much broader issue: that is moral concern. I will finally make my argument against Steinbock as well as address any issues she could possibly raise against my argument. Peter Singer believed that all species, whether it be human or non-human, deserve equal consideration of interests and quality of life.
When it comes to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, I believe that he has found a common thread in humanity in the fact that humans strive for the moderate in living virtuously. However, I would argue that the thread is varied enough to have no true worth in discerning the aspects of humanity. People have too different moralities and goals. Because Aristotle allows for these “local variations”, as Martha Nussbaum later terms in her defense of Aristotle, he is acknowledging that there cannot be an overarching analysis of humanity.
The blue eyed – brown eyed experiment in my opinion is indeed ethical. The issue at hand with this experiment is will it cause permeant future psychological damage. Jane Elliott conducted this experiment with her third-grade students which some would say it is too harsh of an exercise for a group that young; She wanted to teach her student that discrimination is wrong which have been a topic they discussed from the first day of school but felt the student would become confused with the fact she just honored Dr. king in the month of February and now she had to explain to them that he was assassinated because of discrimination. Jane Elliott agreed that this exercise can do Psychological damage if not conducted correctly but the benefits are remarkable.
According to Galen Strawson, moral responsibility to punish some of us with eternal torment (hell) and rewards others with eternal bliss (heaven). I am going to argue that we cannot be morally responsible for our actions which is also Strawson’s argument. He has a basic argument that claims you perform the action that you perform because of the way you are, in particular mental respects. To be truly morally responsible for your action, you must be truly morally responsible for your character, personality, and motivational structure or in other words, who you are. We are born with determined predispositions that we are not responsible for and we are exposed to certain influences that we are not responsible for.
