ipl-logo

Multitasking In An Always-On World

1139 Words5 Pages

What if getting two things done at once was a bad thing? Although completely unbelievable at first, multitasking is indeed unhealthy and doesn’t allow one’s self to accomplish more. When multitaskers spend time on multiple things and not just one, they allocate time to multiple things instead of focusing on one. The end result is producing several average things in comparison to one great thing. This is exactly what S. Craig Watkins, author of “Fast Entertainment and Multitasking in an Always-On World”, discusses when he outlines why multitasking is hurtful. This aligns with ICMPA’s view, author of “Students Addicted to Social Media”, who also believes that multitasking is bad but not necessarily harmful for people. Although both authors agree …show more content…

Originally Watkins concludes that media multitasking doesn’t give humans the ability to pay attention to things. He believes that media multitasking diminishes people’s attention span since they have to constantly jump their attention from one thing to another. Moreover Watkins defends the accusation of media multitasking being misleading when he states, “The issue media multitasking raises is not simultaneous media use per se, but rather the ability of humans to pay attention in an always-on, always connected digital-media environment”(Watkins 149). In summary, Watkins strongly questions whether or not humans are capable of paying attention in a world filled with technology. ICMPA challenges Watkins’ view by examining the consequences of living in a world with technology and media multitasking. The first outcome of not being able to media multitask was that people were separated from their loved ones. This is evident by one of ICMPA’s study recipients who stated, “Going without media meant, in their world, going without their friends and family”(ICMPA 484). In this case, ICMPA points out how media multitasking supported people in communicating with people close to them, indirectly suggesting that no attention was lost. Yet another statement made by ICMPA altering Watkin’s view on media multitasking takes place when ICMPA discusses the …show more content…

ICMPA does this by initially agreeing with Watkins view on how media multitasking accounts for most of our attention distribution. ICMPA then switches gears by stating how multitasking provides a basis for communication. This differs from Watkins original point in which he states how media multitasking doesn’t allow people to focus. ICMPA closes with restating how media multitasking better informs people about their surrounding world, altering Watkins original belief that stated how it is challenging what to pay attention to in a world of media multitasking. Watkins’ proposition puts forward a world in which media multitasking has negative effects whereas ICMPA implies that a world filled with media multitasking would be delightful. The truth of the matter is that only time will tell which author, if any, is correct and until then one can only

Show More
Related
361 Words | 2 Pages

The article, “Taking Multitasking to Task” by Mark Harris demonstrates the effects of having too much technology in our lives and observes the effects of technology on his life and society. Harris begins his essay referring to personal anecdotes of his use of technology and how it affects his life drastically to a point where there is no return from it. In the book, Fahrenheit 451, Montag’s and Faber’s observation of effects of technology in society, are related to Harris’s observations about technology because society doesn’t want to utilize technology it wants to become consumed by it. Harris’s observation of technology in the society we live in today relates to Montag’s and

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

However, at what point does the weight of our divided attention tilt towards disaster? Within the pages of A Deadly Wandering, Matt Richtel, a Pulitzer Prize winning author and writer for the New York Times, contemplates the impact of technology on human attention and the potential consequences of dividing our attention. Richtel seeks not only to understand why James and Keith lost their lives on that fateful day, but to also gain knowledge about the essence of attention (34). Throughout the narrative, Richtel utilizes research conducted by experts in the field of attention to illustrate the effect of divided attention on such critical tasks as driving an automobile.

Read More
1375 Words | 6 Pages

Always On In this chapter Sherry Turkle discusses how new technologies have shaped the manner in which we interact with other individuals. Relationships have changed. In this new technological era, where one can remain online all time through various devices, Turkle wonders if being “on” effects the way we perceive others. Since our time is spent looking at screens, we are absent from what is happening in the real world. Instead of being aware of our surroundings, many are consumed by the many different possibilities that the Net provides.

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

"The net is designed to be an interruption system, a machine geared to dividing attention," - Carr argues that the internet is designed to distract us and prevent us from engaging in deep and focused thinking. "The more we use the Web, the more we train our brain to be distracted... we’re losing our ability to concentrate," - Carr suggests that the constant distractions and multitasking involved in using the internet are making us less able to focus and concentrate. "The depth of our intelligence hinges on our ability to transfer information from working memory to long-term memory," - Carr suggests that the constant bombardment of information and lack of deep focus on any one topic is hindering our ability to remember and retain information. " The Web's cacophony of stimuli short-circuits both conscious and unconscious thought, preventing our minds from thinking either deeply or creatively," - Carr argues that the internet's constant barrage of information and distractions is preventing us from engaging in deep and creative thinking. "We are becoming ever more adept at scanning and skimming, but what we are losing is our capacity for concentration,

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

Is technology changing our brains for the better or for the worse? The human brain is a biological masterpiece and is the most advanced organ on the face of the planet. In Richard Restak’s essay “Attention Deficit: The Brain Syndrome of Our Era,” he speaks about how the advancements in technology in this modern era have affected the brain’s habits and functions. Multitasking is requiring the brain to change how it functions, its organizations, and efficiency throughout day-to-day tasks and is also enabling people to do things otherwise not possible. Within the past two decades, the amount of time we spend on using technology has increased by a large amount.

Read More
271 Words | 2 Pages

Nicholas Carr, What the Internet is doing to Our Brains The Shallows (2010) asserts that, “The price we pay to assume technology’s power is alienation.” He supports this assertion by saying, “They both ultimately achieve their mental and behavioral effects by shaping the synaptic organization of the brain.” Also by, “ We long to keep it activated.” The writer concludes in order for people to improve their thoughts, they will have to cope with the new technology and how they think. Carr believes that technology is taking over how people interact with each other.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion, although many people believe new forms of electronic media are harmful to people’s intelligence, Steven Pinker thinks otherwise. He successfully proves this by bringing up many counterarguments and disproving them as well as having very trustworthy credentials. That being said, he also thinks it is important to practice self control to avoid becoming too distracted with these new forms of media and

Read More
181 Words | 1 Pages

The article “Mind Over Mass Media”, written by Professor Steven Pinker, describes the impact of media on human lives and brains. Pinker illustrates the benefits people gain from using the worlds quickly increasing technology and media. Pinker suggests that today’s technology such as, PowerPoint, Google, and other forms of social media can actually enhance and bring more intelligence to the mind, instead of being detrimental. Critics believe that the many different forms of media can lower intelligence. However, Pinker declares that scientists are using all of this technology everyone else is using, and are still discovering new things.

Read More
371 Words | 2 Pages

Multitasking and social issues place demands on our minds every day.

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

Nicholas Carr's argument against the internet was very strong, and it persuaded me. It is very difficult for me to go against his opinion. I agree that the internet is changing us, but not in ways we think. There are long-term effects of using the internet as often as we do. He states that the internet is changing the way our brains function such as having a shorter attention span, negatively changing the way we critically think, and negatively changing our reading skills.

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

In the past few years humans have spent much more time indoors with their technology than outdoors. Televisions, computers, and smartphones tend to draw greater numbers of people inside their homes, just as humans did in the futuristic world of Leonard Mead where no one left their homes at night. (“The Pedestrian”). Children especially have been infected with the media bug, much like Peter and Wendy, who are unable to stray away from their virtual reality in “The Veldt”. It is understandable that many-particularly older- people believe that technology is affecting how human naturally interact with each other and their surroundings.

Read More
615 Words | 3 Pages

I read multitasking can cause the heart to beat extremely fast and that cause a steady flow of stress hormones. Which can cause headaches, stomach trouble, and sleep problems. With the heart beating extremely fast, that can cause problems including back pain, heart disease, and depression. Multitasking should only be used on short term goals and activities; listening to music and running, because those thing goes together.

Read More
193 Words | 1 Pages

Throughout my experiences I have discovered my tremendous ability to multitask. During my years of college, EMT and hospital volunteering I have shown persistent success. Able to study for a microbiology exam while at the firehouse as an EMT might seem hard for others. However, I feel most comfortable in these situations and seem to have success as well. Earning an A on my exam and reporting to 10+ EMS calls seems to be a productive and successful day for me.

Read More
1690 Words | 7 Pages

Although multitasking appears to get more work done at once, it is in fact less productive in a school or work setting. Multitasking has more of a negative effect on males than females and has a negative effect on the brain which can make life harder in school and on the job. Multitasking works the brain harder than normal, which can fatigue the body’s brain and get less work done. Studies found that, “When we look at brain-imaging studies of people who multitask, their frontal lobes require a lot of additional blood flow.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

For me personally, I have to rely on multitasking, especially when it comes to my job. I work as a hostess in a buffet restaurant and when it gets really busy I have to do many things at once such as, answering phone calls, seating the customers, giving out tickets, adding up the customers at each section, and remembering where empty seats are located at. In my situation, the only way I can complete each task is by multitasking. Without multitasking, the customers will become impatient because of the long wait. However, doing so many things at once can lead to mistakes.

Read More

More about Multitasking In An Always-On World

Related Topics

Open Document