How should history view Rutherford B. Hayes: hero or villain? Explain. Rutherford Hayes the 19th President of the United States didn’t win the popular vote but, “was elected president after a partisan Electoral commission awarded him all of the electoral votes in dispute.” Hayes appears to have a good personality and to have good intentions for the country. It Also seems that he has a very good reputation for honesty.
On the government website, Ned is written as a folk hero who stood up and fought for what he believed in, which was for fairness in the police. Ned Kelly was a villain, he did murder some people, but the police at the time were just as
During his childhood, he always had it rough. You cannot deny that he did some questionable things but what choice did he have? Ned Kelly fought for his survival and for his family. He deserved to live a free
Ned Kelly was born on 28th December 1854. He was a ruthless bushranger from the late 1800’s in Australia. If someone can be classified as a villain, that is undoubtedly Ned Kelly. His actions speak for themselves as he murdered, stole, and robbed people and places to gain wealth for himself. In his short life of 25 years, Ned Kelly has stolen hundreds of livestock, robbed two banks, and murdered three policemen.
The escaping prisoners killed two guards with pistols Clyde hid. Clyde escaped using an eruption of machine gun firing. During their final months of crime these two wounded four police officers. On May 23, 1934, police officers from Louisiana and Texas, concealed themselves in bushes along the highway near Sailes, Louisiana.
According to historian John Molony, "Kelly grew up in a time when the law was seen to be arbitrary and when people like himself, who were poor, Irish and Catholic, were treated harshly by the authorities" (Molony, 2001, p. 1). Kelly's criminal career began in his teenage years, and he soon became known as a horse thief and
Nanberry is rejected by the aboriginals because he can’t be trusted anymore because they think of him as a child and they also think he is a traitor since he was helping the governor by translating for them and he hasn 't been initiated yet, so they think he wouldn 't understand what they are going through there for when Nanberry
Kelly’s parents were described as traditional and honest citizens, and there was no indication that Kelly received any severe treatment from them (O.V.P. Company, n.d.). Not only were Kelly’s parents the average traditional value family but were called relatively wealthy on top of that (O.V.P. Company, n.d.). Kelly’s parents do not seem to have anything to do with his criminal future. Kelly was probably under decent stress as he was a near-failing college student but all in all, he had a good home life. George Kelly had destined himself for crime.
In my opinion, I would characterize Nat Turner as evil. According to the confession of Nat Turner it stated, “The calm deliberate composure with which he spoke of his actions.” This explains that he spoke about his horrible actions in a calm manner. I would characterize Nat Turner as evil because when describing his actions he said it in a peaceful and tranquil way.
The distribution of wealth has always been a conflict of interest between those in an industrial society. Many times, we find the all the poor being grouped as oppressed, and all the rich being grouped as oppressive. But this is not the most accurate way of thinking. We see Andrew Carnegie as part of the rich being grouped as oppressive, or a villain. Given the fact that he saw his success in the height of the American Era of Industrialization, Carnegie got a lot of backlash for the issues surrounding the poor that worked for him.
Clink, Clink, Clink! That is the sound of the money going into Andrew Carnegie's pocket. Who was Andrew Carnegie? Well Andrew was a wealthy business executive. He ran the biggest steel business in the 19s.
During the late 1800s, there were some very bad, powerful people. One of them was Andrew Carnegie, captain of the steel industry. Andrew Carnegie was a Scottish immigrant who came to America to seek a better life. He made his money in the steel industry after figuring out a way to manufacture it faster. Andrew Carnegie was a villain because he didn’t care about his workers, preached about world peace and then turned around and gave the U.S. Navy steel, and because his club tampered with a dam, killing thousands.
Andrew Carnegie was a hero in some people 's eyes , not so much in others . That’s why everyone has their own opinion. In this essay you will read one reason someone might think he’s a hero , and two reasons why he is not a hero for the rest of the people. What that means is that this paper mostly leans on that Andrew Carnegie is not a hero and you will read why . Andrew Carnegie was a very wealthy man.
Was Andrew Carnegie a hero? Many people have asked this hotly debated question. Andrew Carnegie was an incredibly influential businessman. He was one of the richest Americans at the time, using the money to fund his philanthropy. He donated millions of dollars to various organizations, leading people to view him as a hero.
A villain- a character whose evil actions or motives are important to the plot. Macbeth’s greed for power is what shaped him to be the villain in the play. In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Macbeth, despite the good Macbeth had done in the very beginning his actions throughout make him the villain.
