The distribution of wealth has always been a conflict of interest between those in an industrial society. Many times, we find the all the poor being grouped as oppressed, and all the rich being grouped as oppressive. But this is not the most accurate way of thinking. We see Andrew Carnegie as part of the rich being grouped as oppressive, or a villain. Given the fact that he saw his success in the height of the American Era of Industrialization, Carnegie got a lot of backlash for the issues surrounding the poor that worked for him. But he cannot simply be defined by the issues with the wage decrease, and therefore, does not deserve to be called a villain. Carnegie received a lot of hatred from those working under him. Most of the rhetoric unsurprisingly arose around the time of the Homestead Strike, when workers revolted against the …show more content…
This is exemplified in Document O, which was a comic published around the time of the strike. Carnegie is shown decreasing the wages of workers and giving away gifts to other areas of interest. Given that the document was published at the time of increased insecurity and anger, we cannot take it as a full, unbiased reflection of how people thought back then. Document I shows that during the same year of the strike, steel workers were actually making more than many other industrial wages, and working the same amount of hours. A wage cut did happen though and even if it was not bad on a general platform, it hurt many steel workers. Carnegie could have easily ignored the issues and let it die out, but he seemed to have tried and fix the problem. We are not sure why he didn't increase wages, and so we have to assume there was something holding him back. To compensate though, he gave away 4 million dollars, from his pocket, to a Homestead relief fund