ipl-logo

Nuclear Deterrence Is Obsolete Essay

820 Words4 Pages

This research paper will aim to explore whether there is a need for nuclear technology in today’s society, specifically the technologies that act as a deterrent against other countries. A nuclear weapon is defined as, ‘a bomb or missile that uses nuclear energy to cause an explosion’ (Oxford Dictionary). For the purpose of this paper deterrence will be used to mean discouragement and the term obsolete will be defined as outdated. A doctrine is simply a policy. Posing the question of; is the possession of bombs or missiles that could potentially cause a nuclear explosion, an out-dated policy? This paper will aim to probe in to arguments for and against a countries need for nuclear weapons that act as a deterrence. It will cover the moral, social and political implications that these weapons have and will then go on to determine whether nuclear deterrence is obsolete. The first …show more content…

The biggest security strategy of any nation is that of self-defence, and the argument that a state has the right to develop any strategy or technology to achieve this is a valid one. Furthermore, the damage that nuclear weapons cause in the short term is no different to that of an aerial bombardment for example. To use Japan as another example, during World War Two, there was more damage caused by the aerial bombing raids than there was by either of the atomic bombs dropped at Hiroshima or Nagasaki (Onlinemilitaryeducation.org). This then poses the dilemma; under what circumstances should nuclear weapons be used? Not whether nuclear weapons cause too much damage in the long run. This rationale indicates that nuclear weapons should not be abolished, but the circumstances of how they are deployed should be scrutinised, either way, this counterpoint advocates nuclear deterrence and therefore could argue the point against them being an obsolete

Show More
Related

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Russell-Einstein Manifesto

1094 Words | 5 Pages

This is a powerful argument, as it appeals to the emotions of the reader by suggesting a devastating and irreversible outcome if nuclear weapons are not abolished. They warn, “Shall we put an end to the human race, or shall mankind renounce war?” This statement is a stark reminder of the potential consequences of our actions and the need to work together to prevent such a catastrophic event. The authors argue that the use of nuclear weapons would result in the destruction of civilization as we know it. They claim that the only way to prevent a nuclear war is to eliminate nuclear weapons altogether.

Read More

Should The United States Abolish Nuclear Weapons Dbq Essay

688 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the years of 1945 and 1991, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were involved in what is today is identified as the Cold War. During this dark time many lived in fear due to the newest weapon that would be used in war, nuclear weapons. These weapons caused fear throughout the whole world because of their capability to kill thousands with just one. Today many debate over the abolition of nuclear weapons in the United States. Some argue that the U.S. should abolish nuclear weapons, while others say nuclear weapons should not be abolished in the United States.

Read More

Atomic Decision Dbq

1362 Words | 6 Pages

Nuclear Weapons and the Escalation of the Cold War, 1945-1962. Edited by Melvyn P Leffler and Odd Arne Westad, Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 376–397, history.stanford.edu/publications/nuclear-weapons-and-escalation-cold-war-1945-1962. Listwa, Dan. “Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Long Term Health Effects.”

Read More

Nuclear Warfare Dbq

1345 Words | 6 Pages

Wyatt Short Professor Justice English 0804-L03 27 March 2017 Nuclear warfare came about during World War II, after Leo Szilard Germen scientist who studied chemistry, found out that there is a way to spilt an atom or combine the atom that causes a violent physics, decided to write Roosevelt a letter explaining Hitler might be on the verge of creating his own bomb that would give him a far greater lead in the war. They found out that splitting the nuclei or combining them creates a violent reaction In 1941 Franklin started to discover his own nuclear warfare. Even though the Nazis were close to have the power in their control, people think this type of warfare is a cruel and unusual punishment and should not be used in war, but

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Atoms For Peace

887 Words | 4 Pages

Before his election to the presidency, Dwight Eisenhower sought to contain the atom’s destructive power (). Yet, in his first speech at the United Nations as President of the United States, Eisenhower argued for the normalization of the international proliferation of nuclear technology (Office of the President, 1953). The motivation behind his now famous “Atoms for Peace” speech illuminates an interesting contradiction between the obvious American nonproliferation objectives and the president’s political calculation. The key to understanding this contradiction is to separate Eisenhower’s contemporary political motivations from the consequences of the president’s choice to pursue international proliferation of peaceful nuclear technology.

Read More

Comparing George Orwell's 'You And The Atomic Bomb'

1692 Words | 7 Pages

On August 6, 1945 humanity’s relationship to war, and state power changed as the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. Two month later, George Orwell wrote a piece entitled “You and the Atomic Bomb,” attempting to understand the consequences of the use of a nuclear weapon and looking towards the future world with nuclear weapons. Importantly, Orwell outlined the next fifty years of history, a cold war. The United States’ nuclear policy, showed how Orwell was correct in articulating the relationship between the United States and Soviet Union, with in the context of nuclear weapons. The United States’ nuclear strategy was based on the changed the nature of war, the perception of living in a constant state of war, attempts to rationalize nuclear weapons, and the separation of the means and ends within the context of war.

Read More

American Involvement In The Korean War

1877 Words | 8 Pages

On July 16, 1945, a massive fireball erupted over the desert of northern New Mexico. Not long after, on August 6, and again on August 15, the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, ending World War Two (WWII) and presumably changing the face of war forever. The destructive power of atomic weapons stunned the world and ushered in a new era of defense strategy based on an entirely new paradigm. That paradigm depended on numerous assumptions about the nature of war and conflict in the new nuclear age. After WWI, prevailing assumptions about the viability of nuclear deterrence, the possibility of limited warfare, and the nature of communist expansion, defined US defense policy.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Utilization Of Atomic Weapons

879 Words | 4 Pages

The request to get rid of atomic weapons ought not be mistaken for the need to depend to a much more prominent degree on atomic force for tranquil purposes. The

Read More

Nuclear Deterrence Between The United States And The Union Of Soviet Socialist Republics

262 Words | 2 Pages

The art of fear is essential in nuclear deterrence. Using the film Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1964) I will argue that nuclear deterrence is hard to achieve when communication of nuclear capabilities is not well established amongst states. In this paper, I will use the film Dr. Strangelove (1964) to argue how theories such as deterrence theory, realist theory, security dilemma, preventative war, pre-emptive war as well as relative gains and zero sum game led to a failure to achieve nuclear deterrence between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. To make my argument on how more nuclear weapons may hinder deterrence, this essay will proceed as follows; I will firstly discuss the how nuclear deterrence and mutually

Read More

The Effects Of Photography And Film On WWII

1429 Words | 6 Pages

The atrocities during the war (the Holocaust and atomic bombings) precipitated a worldwide dialogue concerning international cooperation and safeguarding human rights. Subsequently, one pivotal solution emerged in 1945 by establishing the United Nations to prevent future wars while engendering concordance amongst states. These events highlighted that nuclear weaponry's destructive capability significantly influenced views on arms control policies, compelling public advocacy for disarming efforts (Dower par. 17). The bombings also acted as a caution against the likelihood of disastrous destruction in the event of future confrontations. They aided in encouraging international efforts to inhibit the dispersion of nuclear weapons.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of British Nuclear Weapons

798 Words | 4 Pages

Having nuclear weapons is a extremely polemical issue in the modern world .This is because this issue is having many benefits and drawbacks for states who own nuclear arsenal , there some questions need to answers such as How much does UK spend on its weapons and if UK leaves its weapons and spend much more money in British community what would happen ? . There are many opponents who claim that the United Kingdom should leave its nuclear weapons and focus on the civil life which can provide a better life for the next generations. However , Some supporters say that if Britain keeps its nuclear power , it can help to the balance of the changing world power . This essay will contain persuasive reasons for each point view in this argument and

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Tuition Free Colleges

316 Words | 2 Pages

The debate whether or not tuition free colleges should be allowed or not because of many reasons. One reason why I think this will be good is because that there will be more students who could not afford college before who will have higher chances of getting a degree. Most of these students that are unprosperous could not pay the tuition for all four years, but now they don’t have to. Another reason why colleges should be free for low income students is because the more educated the population, the more people will be better at decision making in society. One of the best ways to fix any society is to educate the public because it will hopefully change their minds on how they act and view themselves.

Read More

Should North Korea Have The Right To Pursue Nuclear Weapons Essay

900 Words | 4 Pages

Also, if the United States and Russia could pursue nuclear weapons while unstable, why can Iran and North Korea not do so. DETERRING AND DEFENDING USING NUCLEAR WEAPONS

Read More

The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

628 Words | 3 Pages

The use of these nuclear weapons would soon be questioned by many for use, based upon the debate as to whether or not these weapons of mass destruction are truly moral. With this morality in question, it is therefore necessary to declare the use of nuclear weapons in warfare inexcusable and utterly illegal.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Should Nuclear Weapons Be Banned?

1172 Words | 5 Pages

If nuclear weapons were ever used again it could wipe out all of humanity. The United States created the first nuclear weapon in 1945, and with those nuclear weapons they bombed two Japanese cities called Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nuclear Weapons should be banned, Countries should not have weapons that could wipe out the civilization. Nuclear weapons pose a direct threat to everyone. They cause distrust among nations and they are useless in addressing any of today 's real security threats.

Read More

More about Nuclear Deterrence Is Obsolete Essay

Related Topics

Open Document