Leadership Self Reflection

1714 Words7 Pages

Some people think leadership is guiding and control others to complete tasks. On other hand, it motivates the people and influence them to do tasks effectively. Leadership can affect on productivity and communication. Leadership direct and influence on employee morale. Democratic leaders are open with employees. They influence others and share information with others. On the other hand, the autocratic are close. They do what they want. They do not share ideas with members. In this essay, I will talk about my personality in leadership. Mayrs briggs type indicators is INFJ.
My primary mode of living is focus internally. I take things in primarily by intuition that means dealing with things by how I feel with them. Alternatively, how they fit …show more content…

I have the close numbers for each one. I got 8 for accommodating, 7 for collaborative, 6 for compromising, 5 for avoiding and 4 in competing. The highest one is accommodating that I focus on relationship needs, I sacrifice my own personal goals to satisfy others, yield to another point of view and I feel of people 's feeling. The advantages of the accommodating are to preserve harmony and avoiding disruption, take quick decision under pressure, and the relationship is the most important goal. Also, it is effective to preserve future relation with others. In addition, the close number from accommodating is collaborating. It is assertive and collaborative. It means that my partner and I reach and achieve both of goals. This is very effective in complex tasks where I need to find the best and quick solution. Also, it is effective way to make bigger space for many different ideas from different people. However, the lower conflict mode is competing. It is assertive and uncooperative. It is the opposite of accommodating. That mean you act in all ways to achieve your goals without seeking to cooperate with others. In brief, I agree with conflict modes that I am accommodating because I have story in this situation. For example, when I worked with my colleagues about final project, I always organize the work and give them the part, which they want it. However, in the one of our final project, I worked with someone who is competing. She wanted to be leader, but she did not distribute the tasks equally. She just wanted to do what she wants without take our ideas. She just show what the best of her, and ignored us. I got angry. After that, I decided with our members to change her ideas, and we created different ideas. The teacher was satisfied of our works, and we got full