ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay About Cloning

619 Words3 Pages

The practice of cloning started in 1960 with the cloning of plants. As years have passed, cloning has advanced to cloning animals. Since there were many scientists that were practicing this, it became polarizing subject. People who thought it was moral said it would help provide a missing organ or tissue, but people who thought it was immoral said it wasn’t right because it was unnatural to our society. Many people became interested in cloning because of the advancement of medical procedures that can help patients with organs, burns and genetic disorders. Although opponents believed that cloning can be high in cost, it helps with the development of cells and can cure illness around the world.
Cost has always been an issue when it comes to spending large amounts of money. Opponents argued saying that “The people who want this are spending huge sums of money to get their pet immortalized or to guarantee they’re getting a pet exactly like the one they had before, and it’s simply not possible.” because money that is spent on cloning will not always be guaranteed to have the same looking pet as the original. The reason for that is that genes …show more content…

It should be on how much a person cares for it because if a person pays a costly price for it they would care for the cloned pet like how they care for the the original pet. Although they may look deformed, they may grow up strong and useful for the world. In the article Here, Kitty it states how “Studies show that a quarter of the 60 million pet-owning households would consider cloning their furry friends” which means that pet owners would consider to pay as much because of their love for their own pets. If the research was focused on duplicating the brain, which contains the prior memories and mental awareness, then the appearance shouldn’t matter to the owner. In this way, money is efficiently spent and the minds of living beings can be passed down to future

Show More
Related
2906 Words | 12 Pages

There are many arguments in support of human cloning. Some are fairly easy to accept, such as elimination of genetic disease”(Human Cloning). With the technology of cloning, the percentages of disease could reduce. That also includes genetic issues could be solved as well. Cloning has been said to give therapeutic support when making new cures.

Read More
1195 Words | 5 Pages

United States Constitution Ever since 1787, the U.S. constitution has remained one of the most influential and important documents in the history of the United States. It set the foundation for which this great nation could be built upon, and there have been more than one hundred countries that have used it to model their own constitutions upon (Constitutionfacts.com, n.a.). There were a lot of very critical elements and circumstances involved in its creation. The Revolutionary War (1775-1783) that we fought against Great Britain resulted in the Treaty of Paris being signed, which gave the U.S. the authority to govern itself in 1783.

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

Should Taxpayer Money Go Towards Cloning? If therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning are both dangerous then why allow it in human and animal cloning? Cloning is the process of producing similar populations of genetically identical individuals. “95% of cloning have resulted in failures.”

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

“I love those tight jeans and that blonde hair, those big blue eyes make me want to follow you to the moon, but not on that mountain,” Dennis said running his fingers through his hair and flipped his head back. “I don’t want to go to the moon, just on the mountain with someone to keep me company,” Ruth said. “Do you want to meet here around 11:00? We could be back by 4:30.” “We can’t go up there!”

Read More
1325 Words | 6 Pages

Many believe cloning is a perversion of science, and some are even concerned with a real life Frankenstein situation: “Reproductive cloning… could lead to a Dr. Frankenstein’s vision of lab manufactured humans. To me this is a perversion of science” (Ford 1). Furthermore, in Frankenstein, Dr. Frankenstein detached from the world as he became obsessed with his studies, diminishing his health. A similar thing could happen to scientists who clone if they decide that they are “playing god,” which can be dangerous for the scientists and the clones. Cloning is so controversial and causes an overbearing amount of stress for it to be befitting to the human mind, as Victor Frankenstein puts it, “If the study to which you apply yourself has a tendency to weaken your affections, and to destroy… those simple pleasures in which no alloy can possibly mix, then that study is certainly unlawful… not befitting of the human minds” (Shelley 50).

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

Cloning Twenty years ago, we wouldn't have imagined having all of the technology that we have today. Most people believe that each new form of technology or any new advancement that is made is meant to better benefit living things here on Earth. Cloning, being one of the more recent and interesting advancements made, has been argued to be hurting us more than helping us. Because of the amount of deaths compared to successful clones, the amount of animals in shelters, and the fact that you most likely will not get an exact clone are all reasons on why cloning is not benefiting us.

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

I think that cloning is bad, because you can 't bring back animals personalities it can only bring back animals’ in physical form not mentally, it can neither improve society because of the amount of money cloning uses and when they do succeed the world may not have a stable economy and therefore have no use with clones, and it can be considered animal cruelty because of the amount of animals that die in the process. It cannot bring back a beloved pet’s personality nor save animals other that bring them back. As it states in the article `cloning animals pros and cons´ “Although your precious dog or cat has been brought to life, there is no guarantee that it will have the same personality as your lost loved one. ”This means that cloned pets most likely will not have the same personalities. And that if your pet cat died, that it would only be the same physically“This process only clones the muscles, bones and genetic makeup of your favorite animal, but not its traits or personality says the arthur of the article.

Read More
901 Words | 4 Pages

Should or should we not prohibit genetically engineered babies is the question to ask. After years and year of trying to figure out the cure for a disease like a mitochondrial disease, a group of professional on the topic believes that it would greatly benefit the baby ’s outcome exceptionally if their parents has harmful genetics. Most people concern would be how the baby would turn out because there have not been any clinical trials that prove that the genetics that is engineered properly work like they should. I personally believe that the genetics of baby should not be engineered, but I do believe that it should be up to the parent of the children since it is their child in the first place.

Read More
1163 Words | 5 Pages

The public often hears of magnificent animal cloning miracles like Cumulina the Mouse, who lived up to nearly three years when the average lifespan is a few months, and thinks that it is a brilliant scientific occurrence. Conversely in the past decade, animal cloning has become more popular for generating food, but the process has countless flaws. Animal cloning is insufficient for supplying food to mass human populations. The procedure scientists use to clone animals has a high failure rate, and in addition, the clone could suffer from myriad medical issues in life. After numerous surveys were conducted, results displayed that a preponderance of Americans disapprove of using animal cloning to manufacture food.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Cloning at the gene level is acceptable and is done extensively in research areas. However, therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning raises skepticism and debate both in the general society and the scientific community. Among the argument raised is the possibility of cloning human beings; whether the individuals derived are seen as a complete human with the whole set of human rights attached to them. Body >>> Scientific Advantage <<< 2 PAR Fiester (2005) states that most of the animal cloning projects are driven by the goal of meeting human needs such as treatment of diseases, food production, and entertainment. However, there are animal cloning projects aimed at conserving endangered or

Read More
1614 Words | 7 Pages

Most people in our society, no matter what level of education that they may have, have heard of the cloning, specifically the cloning of Dolly the lamb, and have some notions regarding the idea of cloning humans. "The successes in animal cloning suggest to some that the technology has matured sufficiently to justify its application to human cloning" (Jaenisch et al.). However, not every agrees that human cloning is a something that should be put into practice (Hoskins). There generally seem to be two basic divisions on this issue: those who find it inappropriate and unethical, and those who find it a reasonable and necessary step in the progression of scientific research (Lustig).

Read More
1139 Words | 5 Pages

Combine both animal and plant endangerment numbers, there is 23,000 animals and plants are endangered. Animal cloning, to save endangered animals should happen,soon when animals do get cloned, the 23,000 animal count, will fall! Within the next few paragraphs you will see how pleasant animal cloning can be! The Passenger Pigeon shall live again! Yes the Passenger Pigeon, will and MUST live again!

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

Do you know that based on the scientific studies, 90% human cloning tuned out to be unsuccessful. Human cloning(modifying babies) is a process of producing new identical babies by altering their genomes. Some of studies show that scientists successfully cloned animals such as cows, Pigs, and sheep. For the past 3-5 years human cloning have a lot of debates and controversies between peoples. However Human cloning is dangerous for the new engineered baby and their moms, so it should be banned to prevent new disease, to constantly limit the population of dying human beings, and to stop unnecessary fees to modify babies.

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

Many scientists are trying to clone humans but is it ever justified? There are a whole lot of debates on this topic, and I am strongly against it. Human cloning is ethically wrong; there are many risks involved, which will lead to detrimental effects on human society. Before going into my points, I would like to talk about what cloning is. According to the National Human Genome Research Institute, cloning is “a number of different processes that can be used to produce genetically identical copies of a biological entity.”

Read More
1531 Words | 7 Pages

Human cloning tends to take place in unreliable laboratories, with scientists who have limited knowledge on what to do if a step they take is incorrect because they are usually just experimenting in unknown territory. (is this true?? Lots of laws regarding cloning especially in the UK) This leads to major ethical difficulties as scientists are playing with human life. Furthermore, if a clone is made and there is even the slightest mishap, whereby the clone could be inclined to suffer if given the chance to grow, some would strongly oppose due to the fact that human life is so complex and needs a perfect designer, not a person in a laboratory wearing a white coat and plastic goggles.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay About Cloning

Related Topics

Open Document