The practice of cloning started in 1960 with the cloning of plants. As years have passed, cloning has advanced to cloning animals. Since there were many scientists that were practicing this, it became polarizing subject. People who thought it was moral said it would help provide a missing organ or tissue, but people who thought it was immoral said it wasn’t right because it was unnatural to our society. Many people became interested in cloning because of the advancement of medical procedures that can help patients with organs, burns and genetic disorders. Although opponents believed that cloning can be high in cost, it helps with the development of cells and can cure illness around the world.
Cost has always been an issue when it comes to spending large amounts of money. Opponents argued saying that “The people who want this are spending huge sums of money to get their pet immortalized or to guarantee they’re getting a pet exactly like the one they had before, and it’s simply not possible.” because money that is spent on cloning will not always be guaranteed to have the same looking pet as the original. The reason for that is that genes
…show more content…
It should be on how much a person cares for it because if a person pays a costly price for it they would care for the cloned pet like how they care for the the original pet. Although they may look deformed, they may grow up strong and useful for the world. In the article Here, Kitty it states how “Studies show that a quarter of the 60 million pet-owning households would consider cloning their furry friends” which means that pet owners would consider to pay as much because of their love for their own pets. If the research was focused on duplicating the brain, which contains the prior memories and mental awareness, then the appearance shouldn’t matter to the owner. In this way, money is efficiently spent and the minds of living beings can be passed down to future