ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

1680 Words7 Pages

The lives of animals are just as important as any human life. Animals receive poor treatment during experiments. There are about 100 million animals used for testing each year in the United States. Animals are tortured and abused and the scientists care very little about their comfort. Animals deserve better treatment and respect from those who are experimenting on them. Experimenting on animals is a huge waste of time and money. There are other options of testing new products or drugs such as Vitro tests. Researchers should not use animals to test new treatments or for any cosmetic reason. One of the concerns with testing on animals is how much money is spent on these experiments. Testing on animals can be very expensive and time consuming. The …show more content…

In the article, “The cost of doing this for the 30,000 unregistered chemicals so that they comply with REACH has been estimated at between €5 billion (US$6 billion) and €10 billion” (Abbott 144). Even knowing there are cheaper alternatives, scientists still choose to continue on with animal testing. Scientists should make better choices in bettering research and the animal usage. So many animals are being used that there is, “An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing” (animal-testing.procon.org). This is an enormous amount of animals being used just for testing. This is truly a waste of the lives of animals and we should be worried about what the future holds. Humane Society International compared a variety of animal tests with their in vitro counterparts. Another example was, “An "unscheduled DNA synthesis" animal test costs $32,000, while the in vitro alternative costs

Show More
Related
800 Words | 4 Pages

The Humane Society International stated, “Some animal tests take months or years to conduct and analyze (e.g., 4-5 years, in the case of rodent cancer studies), at a cost of hundreds of thousands—and sometimes millions—of dollars per substance examined (e.g., $2 to $4 million per two-species lifetime cancer study).” The New England Anti-Vivisection Society also stated, “The traditional testing of chemicals using animals can take up to five years per substance and cost millions of dollars, while non-animal alternatives can test hundreds of chemicals in a week for a fraction of the cost.” Scientists waste millions of dollars on animal studies that are not relevant to humans. There are alternative, cheaper methods that can benefit human research more than animal testing can and further the advancement of science and medicine in months instead of years. By using animals for research, scientists are putting America’s money and animals at

Read More
248 Words | 1 Pages

We shouldn’t test products on animals because it’s cruel, it can affect the environment, and affects humans. Did you know that every year over a hundred million animals of all kinds are killed? We shouldn’t test on animals because it’s cruel. Animals are being shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, and addicted to drugs and much more without painkillers.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

Is it really necessary that these many animals die for our personal benefit? How would you feel if you were abused, and underfed, and unloved? As you can see, the negative effects of animal experimentation definitely outweigh our personal benefits. Animal testing is downright cruel and unnecessary, and mankind should move away from it as soon as possible.

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

Cost: To put this bill into action and to end animal testing it would most likely cost somewhere from 12 billion to 15 billion. This is a lot of money just to end animal cruelty but will save millions of animals and benefit the earth’s environment and the people in many ways. According to the Daily Caller Fed’s spend up to $14.5 billion annually on animal testing. Benefits: It’s wasteful and will save our tax money in the future. Animal experiments prolong the suffering of people waiting for effective cures by misleading experimenters and wasting precious money, time, and resources that could have been spent on human-relevant

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

Each test on just 1 animal costs hundreds if not thousands of dollars. With the

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Every year, around 100 million animals are killed due to animal testing. Research on animals has been around since at least 500 BC. Animals are tested on to help develop medical treatments, check the safety of products that will be used by humans, and for other types of research. During this research, these animals are tortured and killed. This has caused a lot of controversy throughout history.

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

Additionally, the money the government spends on animal testing is increasing over time when it could be put toward better, more purposeful research. Testing facilities have no rules to how they use the money they are given; most of the times the research conducted have no purpose. One researcher states, in 2004 over two billion dollars was wasted on drugs that failed in advanced human testing or were ripped from the market because they were toxic (American Anti…). There is no reason to give any product or drug to the public when they know that when a product is tested on an animal, it still might not be safe to humans. Anyone will say they would rather have quality, trustworthy research over research that is not always right.

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

Using animals to test products and drugs that are intended to be used on animals is inaccurate, cruel, and harms both animals and humans. Using animals to test products is not an accurate

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

This new chemical testing really should put an end to testing on the animals, that way this procedure, of finding cures for us, won’t be harmful to anyone or anything. Kristie Sullivan. M.P.H.. and Sarah Cavanauah, Ph.D. states that; “A study published in Environmental Health Perspectives describes a new chemical testing method using high-throughput screening— which uses robotics to quickly test many chemicals— that is an improvement over certain animal tests for chemical safety, as animals do not reflect human responses or human population variability. The new testing method more effectively characterizes how different individuals respond to chemical exposures, highlighting potentially sensitive individuals or populations that may require stricter controls on chemical use. Differences between humans due to genetic variation, health status, and environmental factors can greatly influence potential responses to chemical exposures.”

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

Jeff Flake, an United States Senator wrote for the Wastebook, stated, “...Over $7.3 million of taxpayers ' money was wasted on studies involving animals in 2016.” This data suggests, that millions of dollars were wasted on animal testing, that money could of went to taxpayers’ instead. We could of used a better method of testing so we don’t waste so much money on testing. To conclude, it is expensive to use animals in testing and

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

Testing products that are going to be sold to people all over the world on animals is a practice that aims to guarantee that the product they are selling to the public is safe, all of this because people are the only animals that can sue each other.

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

According to "Wasteful Animal Testing", the US drug industry monopolize $50 billion per year in scientific researches, but the approval rate of these drugs has not changed in 50

Read More
1258 Words | 6 Pages

There are many non-animal testing alternatives that have been developed which are less expensive and more

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

It is true that animal testing requires a lot of investment. Not only that money is spent on advanced technologies, it is also spent to pay for scientists’ expertise on this particular field. In order for the scientists to do their research, they need suitable equipment and substances. Every year, the National institutes of Health finances between $12 billion to $14.5 billion on animal testing as indicated in a study done by the government (Bastach, 2013). Besides, scientists need to consider the fact that animals need to be sheltered, fed and cared for to keep them alive.

Read More
1115 Words | 5 Pages

In a research it is shown that such animal tests are more expensive than alternative methods and are waste of dollars. For example: “An unscheduled DNA synthesis” test cost $32,000 while the alternative costs around, $11,000. A “rat phototoxity test” costs around $11,500 whereas a non-animal one costs only $1,300. (Kath (Placeholder2)leen Conlee,2013). Since the majority of animals are killed during or after the testing, the lives of animals are sacrificed for poor research that ends up to be flawed with a wastage of

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document