ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Offshore Oil

589 Words3 Pages

Deep sea exploration can have a variety of benefits. It can provide new information about marine species. This exploration can also teach scientists about adaptations organisms use to survive in unsuitable conditions. However, there is also a lot of controversy surrounding the search for oil. I believe that oil should not be drilled offshore, because it can possibly damage local economies. Additionally, instead of getting more oil, money and time should be used to find ways to use the energy we have more wisely and finding renewable resources. Lastly, offshore oil drilling should not be allowed, because it would cause damage throughout the ecosystem and the atmosphere. Offshore oil drilling actually can damage local economies rather than help them. While it may help them by providing jobs when an oil company first arrives, the number of jobs will drop drastically once the oil runs out. Additionally, the oil drilling may crowd out other economic activities by polluting the water. Fishing, boating, and tourism can be severely decreased by the pollution of …show more content…

An oil spill is always a risk when oil is being drilled for. A rig, tanker, or pipeline can become an environmental tragedy so suddenly. The only way to reduce this risk is to simply not drill at all. There is no way to 100% prevent an oil spill. Obviously, an oil spill can cause lots of damage to the oceanic ecosystem by blocking sunlight from photosynthetic marine plants and smothering animals. Referencing the economy, tourism, fishing, and other water activities would not be possible and the economy would be damaged. Additionally, seismic surveys are used to find oil deposits. These powerful sound waves can negatively affect marine animals by affecting their reproduction, migration, and communication. The rigs and pipelines that come with oil drilling can also pollute the air and

Show More
Related
722 Words | 3 Pages

I know this because in the text it states, “A study by the US Energy Information Agency (March 2004) shows it would only reduce US oil imports 4%, having no real effect on prices or supply,” (Doc C Paragraph 1). This shows that drilling for oil would not solve our oil problems since it only reduces our reliance on foreign oil a meager 4%. If drilling has no effect on price, supply or our reliance on foreign oil than should we even drill? I also know this to be true because in Doc C it states, “It’s not possible to be self-sufficient given the amount of oil consumed as a nation. The U.S. uses more oil than it could find domestically, even if it were to drill on all public lands.

Read More
2027 Words | 9 Pages

Fracking has been shown to increase pollution in both the air and water surrounding fracking plants which are currently covering a wide area in the U.S. Hydraulic fracture can also lead to polluted ground and surface water (OccupyTheory 2014). Fracking releases benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene and n-hexane into the air and can be negative for organisms including humans nearby to fracking plants. Disposing of the waste water improperly is also detrimental to the environment like the example given of the fish kill that happened in 2009. In addition to affecting species nearby and the atmosphere hydraulic fracturing is now being linked to more earthquakes. Fracking is thought to have caused the biggest earthquake in Ohio recorded in 2011.

Read More
427 Words | 2 Pages

There are many economic reasons such as drilling in the ANWR would not solve gasoline and oil supply problems and not reduce the prices of gasoline and oil. The oil supplies in the ANWR would not significantly change our energy prospects, it only has a six month supply. Also, with the amount of oil consumed as a nation it is not possible to be self-sufficient (Doc C). Also, there are many environmental reasons such as the Coastal Plain where the highest concentration of the oil has been found is home to the Inupiat.

Read More
1632 Words | 7 Pages

And drilling and exploring the area will also cause tons of pollution. The only real pro of drilling is that the United States will possibly get access to billions of barrels of oil and could cutback on the amount of oil it imports. Considering the pros and cons of the situation it seems pretty clear that the cons outweigh the pros so, it would be illogical to drill for oil. Background:

Read More
329 Words | 2 Pages

The main way that oil and natural gas reserves are acquired are through the means of Fracking. Also known as hydrofracking, this method utilizes a drill that drills down thousands of feet underground, which is then flushed with millions of gallons of water along with additive chemicals at high pressures to break the rocks sheltering the reserves. This method of attainment is quite risky as it comes with many unfavorable consequences that are quite unbeneficial. Like fossil fuel plants, fracking also releases greenhouse gasses like methane(Potential Health and Environmental Effects of Hydrofracking in the Williston Basin, Montana), which is worse than carbon dioxide and causes air pollution. Alongside that, pollutants like Benzene and Xylene also leak out during the fracking process, which is known to cause serious health conditions and even death in some cases due to the long exposure to the pollutants(Potential Health and

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

People from the local level should have the right to decide whether or not the community need such types of life-threatening industries. The local government should actively participate to the local people interacting about the advantages and disadvantages of establishing the fracking oil and gas industries in their locality. However, The nation needs the economic uplift it is very important to the state and nation that it should have the industrial development. Local government is important in the community to regulate the rules in a small group of society. According to an article published in CSC e-newsletter, Denton Texas is the first city to ban hydraulic fracking.

Read More
162 Words | 1 Pages

Hydraulic fracturing has helped the economy in some ways. For example fracking has created over 60,000 new jobs such as drillers, pipe fitters, electricians and engineers for our communities. In Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia and Texas together have enough natural gas to power the entire United States for 110 years because of fracking. In some ways fracking is good for the economy like for example, it gives all Americans a clean, inexpensive source of fuel, and helps the growth of the economy.

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

A lot of this can ruin homes. Third, drilling thousands of miles in the ground can cause earthquakes soon. There have been minor earthquakes, but it has not affect any residents. It has been at least 21 earthquakes a year due to fracking since 2011 and the rate has rose to about 100 yearly. By doing this they should reduce the drilling to limit the number of earthquakes since the numbers went up.

Read More
80 Words | 1 Pages

I think that you should reduced the Alberta’s oil sands. For instance it 's causing global warming, which is bad for our environment and future generations. My first reason is that its ruining homes for animals and birds, for example according to research oil sands are located in breeds grounds which is a place for birds. My second reason is that its bad for the envorimoent because its ruining our foress, and seas with the smell when it mixeses with water.

Read More
613 Words | 3 Pages

Proposition P================ Propostion P was advanced by an advocacy group known as the Santa Barbara Water Guardians, mainly to prohibit the usage of hydraulic fracturing (i.e fracking) within Santa Barbara, threatening its water supply. As such, Proposition P is absolutely essential, not only to ensuring the health of residents in Santa Barbara, but to ensuring long term social, economic, and environmental stability. Where opponents to Proposition P may tend to make arguments which solely favor the number of jobs in the community, or which perhaps presume the importance of the oil industry in Santa Barbara, over other concerns in the community, these other concerns need to be considered more fully in order to illustrate why support of Proposition P is absolutely essential.================

Read More
415 Words | 2 Pages

In our society, oil is one of the resources that is sought out for due to its utility. With the population increase over the years, the availability of oil becomes more concerning. Since oil is used to power our vehicles, create plastics and much more, people begin to wonder about where to go about finding more oil. A question that is asked is: Whether drilling in the Arctic/Antarctic for oil an idea to considered in the near future? Similarly, to other global issues, this question brings upon pros and cons.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

With all the competition, there are advantages and disadvantages that affect that many around the world. While the citizens are enjoying the easy access and price to oil, workers are being laid off, governments are losing large revenues and funding, and some smaller businesses are being shut down. Along with the competition of producing oil, there is competition between oil and its substitutes as well. There is a large variety of substitutes that can be used in place of oil, which is another factor for why oil prices have lowered. The two main uses of oil are for heating and transportation.

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

Therefore, I will examine the consequences of the oil spill and the reactions of the parties involved, such as BP, the government, the states involved, the fisheries and tourism industry and other parties affected by the oil spill. These consequences include environmental damage, litigation, cleaning costs and stricter

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

Before Americans came to this piece of land, the Native American tribes survived and lived off the land. Just like us, when their ancestors died, them buried them in sacred land. Today they are digging up that land and those bodies, in North Dakota to create a new pipeline. Native Tribes have tried endlessly to stop the Government, but sadly there’s no use. Workers are digging up acres of land to continue the pipe from North Dakota to Illinois.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

Our natural resources are at risk every time fracking occurs. Fracking needs to be banned since it is hurting our health and that it drains our natural and limited resources required for us to sustain life.    Water is an essential to living and it is a need. Without it we would be dead from the dehydration. Fracking in this case can contaminate it to where we cannot drink it and if we do it can lead to death or a trip to the hospital:

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Offshore Oil

Related Topics

Open Document