Amanda Ripley demonstrates the consequences for having school sports in “The Case Against High School Sports” because schools are spending too much money on their sports and can be solved. The author brings to the reader’s eye that sports cost way too much money and should be cut. I think Ripley is wrong because even though it cost a lot of money, they should still keep the sports. If they cut the sports, then it’s not fair to the students that are graduating because they could of had a chance to get a scholarship. If the schools cut the sports, then there is no chance for the students.
Many school’s require a C average to even participate. So, without sports would those kids who only keep grades up for sports, fall? Or would American kids realize the importance of education instead of sports and put in more effort? Kolbert discusses the distraction side of sports involvement in school and the different views of academics and sports to parents. Although sports offer a number of life skills, it can take away from student study time.
Is it time to get rid of the American tradition of school sports? In the article, “Yes, It’s Time to Scale Back” the author Amanda Ripley expresses how sports are harmful to the students and school funds. However, in the article, “No Sports Are More Important than Ever” by Tim O’ Shei discusses how school sports benefit students. The article, “10 Reasons Why High School Sports Benefit Students” by Grace Chen also backs up why school sports are important. School sports are a reason for failing grades; on the other hand, there are many positive benefits to having them in schools.
According to " The Case Against High-School Sports" (2013), sports could create some study, health, and time management problems for schools and students. In this post, Amanda Ripley initially shows the benefits when involving in the high-school sports: exercise, sportsmanship lessons, some positive personalities, more fun and staying away from vices. She also writes some tales to inform readers that in the US, students are interested and enjoy in sports more than other peers in other countries. However, she claims that the high-school sports have negative effects on schools and students. Next, she gave some schools ' examples to show the problems when schools and students spent too much time and money in high-school sports.
Amanda also argues that because students are spending their time playing sports, they don’t study as much. This argument is false because the University of Arkansas’s Anna Egalite, Daniel Bowen, and Julie Trivitt find that “athletic coaches in Florida mostly tend to perform just as well as their non-coaching counterparts, with respect to raising student test scores.” Furthermore students who do not have after school activities would not go home and study. They would find something else to do with their time. Most students put off their assignments until the last minute anyway.
In this community lately, there has been discussion lately on sports possibly being removed from the high schools. Although, they get the most recognition that does not mean that just because one little thing it gets removed and completely forgotten about. In fact, so many people do high school sports in the text “Are High School Sports Good For Kids” it explicitly states “Here in Michigan almost 300,000 young people take part in high school sports every year.” This scene particularly shows that many youth athletes participate in high school sports in only one state alone.
College sports are a major part of American culture. College athletes devote hours upon hours a week to their sports training, but unfortunately, sports can take up a lot of time and distract from other important activities. This can harm academics, as athletes have to balance sports and academics, especially at a college. Participating in sports is almost like working a part-time job and having to balance school too which can be difficult to do, and focus may be rendered on one task and not both. Furthermore, athletes will be on scholarships too, which is why college athletes should not be paid.
This notion is supported by Dr. Daniel Gould, who believes that “Children who participate in sports have increased educational aspirations, closer ties to school and increased occupational aspirations in youth” (1). People against the funding of high school sports think that parents and society are placing more emphasis than ever before and, “[P]ressures athletic personnel to deviate on winning from the athlete- centered educational and personal development mission” (Gould 1). However, athletes strive to do better in class. Michael Lorenc, a high school basketball coach believes that “those who seem to have an overwhelming schedule where they’re playing maybe multiple sports, and high academic schedules, they tend to do better than those who don’t do anything extracurricularly” (Gray). Balancing sports and school makes athletes put more effort into keeping up grades while playing the sport they love.
The stress can get so intense, it feels paralyzing. That’s why it is important than ever for schools to invest in their athletic programs,” states the sports article “Should Schools get rid of Sports.” Schools should keep their sports programs because they help improve academics, help improve mental and emotional health, and improves social skills like being on a team. Schools should not get rid of their sports programs because they help with student’s academics.
Sports have many positive outcomes for student-athletes. Sports give many students a head start in what they wish to pursue in the future, whether that is an unfamiliar sport like “Lacrosse” or one of the most common like “Football”. A good amount of students rely on sports to get them where they want to be in their lives. Not only do sports help, but so do clubs like robotics or Power of the Pen. And they should get the same amount of attention as football and basketball players do.
First off, parents, coaches, and teammates put too much pressure on winning. This statement is important because it shows the pressure that is put on student athletes to win. Whether it’s a game, match, or meet, the immense pressure put on students to win is not beneficial. Second, students aren’t able to focus on school work as much as they should. This detail is important because it reveals that student athletes have been more focused on sports rather than academics.
If you are an American student, or were one, you’re familiar with the American obsession with high school sports. High school athletes “rule” the school grounds, their power higher than any band kid or history teacher could ever be. Jocks are portrayed as bullies, stepping on students who are more focused on academics. Funds are supposedly given to sports teams rather than academic teams. But even with these stereotypes taking over American schools, we can not get rid of high school sports.
Should children be focusing only on science and technology or should they also consider putting enormous efforts into mastering sports as well? While some progressively adore the ideology that young kids should focus more on studies than on sports and arts, others undoubtedly despise it. This essay will prudently persuade how sports and arts are equally critical as studies. Eminently qualified graduates not always end up in earning tremendous sums of money through their high-tech jobs. In other words, often students who study well do not end up graduating from college and also miss out no sports expertise.
Ripley states, “Players spend long hours practicing, and that commitment extends to the rest of the school-from late-night band practices and pep rallies to meetings with parents,” (11). She continues, “During football season in particular, focus shifts away from learning,” (Ripley 11). If districts want students to have serious commitment and overall concentration in their studies, sports should no longer be provided. Therefore, schools need to abandon sports to decrease academic distraction and help pave the way to students’ success. To help students do better in school and save more money for districts, schools need to remove sports.
Sports can be fun and entertaining for spectators as well as athletes. As an athlete, playing sports is viewed by many as a way to escape stress and feel great afterward. It is a great way to have fun with friends, be productively competitive, and stay in physical shape. A talented enough student athlete can even be recognized by the local newspaper and its audience. Today, however, high school sports’ competitiveness and especially their importance have increased exponentially from the past.
