Animal captivity costs outweigh the benefits, and the violation of the rights of the individual animals is unjustifiable. Animals everywhere are being taken into captivity on a daily basis for the sole purpose of entertainment and education. Societies opinions of how zoos treat animals and their opinions of whether or not animals should be held in captivity is a common topic in today’s media but yet; hundreds of animals are still dying every year as zoos are still one of the top tourist attractions in the United States. Zoo captivity physically and mentally harms the well-being of animals in more ways than people derive. Solely, there are thousands of pieces of textual evidence and statistics that explain the prime reasons zoos should be abolished entirely.
Throughout time, Zoos have become a more popular thing. Whether for entertainment, or amusement, many people often visit zoos. What they fail to realize is that zoos are far more harmful than they appear to be. Although zoos do a great job at slightly imitating the animals habitat, it is very different in many aspects. The breeding programs zoos offer are less successful than what is expected.
We should keep Zoos because they help protect, heal, and keep animals safe, they also get a bad reputation because some Zoos do mistreat animals but if we work together we can help protect animals and preserve them. “While public outcry continues on the subject of keeping wild animals in captivity, many institutions work hard to maintain healthy homes for their animals and work toward research and conservation,” according to Opposing Viewpoints Online. This essay discusses Shirley McMarlin and that she is a staff writer at the Tribune-Review in addition she has a amazing viewpoint, Mcmarlin argues that “Zoos are an essential resource.” Zoos are an essential resource for science and etc.
Animals in captivity at zoos constantly struggle with problems including stress, boredom, and confinement (Lin). This piece of evidence explains that small habitats in zoos conclude to many health problems. The last way that zoos make
This argument is split into three main viewpoints, the opinion that zoos harm animals, the opinion that zoos save endangered species, and a mix between the two. Viewpoint number three is more of a critique how zoos are good places where bad things happen and should be reformed. Each option has its own individual pros and cons but a reform of zoos and their standards would be the most economical for zoos and aquariums and this method would also be the least harmful and less stressful for the animals involved. The care and wellbeing of the animals involved should be the number one priority of all groups and by cutting back on over breeding, the phasing out of lager animals that naturally roam large distances, and creating environments that’s sole purpose is to educate people, zoos can become a better place for people and animals
THe article states that the zoos are beneficial to the society and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the zoos are not beneficial to the society and he refutes each point of the author 's reasons. First, the article avers that the animales are treated well in the zoos. The professor, by contrast, asserts that the animals are not treated well in the zoos. Moreover, he provides an example of the two bandas that dead in the zoos by a rat 's poinson, tho mangar of the zoo could not prevent that.
In regards to this reason, I will be stating different conditions of different zoos, and how animals are treated in there, moreover, I will be discussing
To sum up, both articles provide evidence that zoos are improving over the years to serve their purpose more effectively. Constant development helps them to save more animals and at the same time show the results to the public which is crucial for inspiring people's participation in conservation programs. So, the two articles on the necessity of zoos are mostly similar as they express the same ideas. Both Cohn and Borrell provide arguments for the significance of zoos which contribute to animal conservation by conducting research, protecting endangered species, encouraging people to participate in conservation programs and forming their connection with the natural
I feel that zoos are a safe place for animals. Not only do they provide fun for family's they are a good way to keep endangered animals safe. Another Thing, what if an animal gets hurt in the wild? Nothing but, if they are in zoos they can treat the animals so they do not become endangered or die off completely.
As Zoos demonstrate best practices in operating sustainable, enhancing exhibits to create acceptable homes for the animals in its care, showing important and impactful improvement to the overall zoological garden expertise, the zoo around the world serve to secure a future for each life and wild places. Thus, zoos are a productive and successful strategy for protecting endangered species
Dear Ms. Indira Naidoo-Harris, Over the years there has been a lot of controversy over zoos. There are currently many animal welfare activists and organizations such as PETA (People for Ethical Treatment of Animals) who have been actively protesting issues like zoos. Their claims include things such as “Zoos deprive animals of the opportunity to satisfy their most basic needs” (PETA website). Although in many cases this is true, zoos have the potential to be the change that animals need. With some goal-oriented planning and some help from the government, zoos can become humane, educational conservation tools.
Zoos have been saving animals from being in danger. In fact, animals are considered as an important part of humans lives. Some people believed that zoos must be built outside cities because it causes a lot of noise and pollution. The majority says that zoos must be built inside cities because it is a means of entertainment and scientific researches Out in the wild, some animals would have a very little chance to survive, especially those on the endangered list.
Zoos are places where animals are put on displays and where they have to live their entire life. People can visit zoos for money and watch animals like they are in some kind of television show or commercial program what is done for people only. People have to notice that zoos are not people entertainment. It is seems like animals in zoos should be free and live in wildlife where they belong.
Imagine, being taken away from your family, and thrown into a cold, steel, cage. Luckily, people don’t have to worry about that, but all wild animals do. This is what zoo’s do. They carelessly take an animal from their habitat and family, against their will, and take them to an unfamiliar place where you get starved to be trained and stared at. Zoos lie to us, and we don’t even realize it.
This leads to many concerns from the public on the physical and mental impacts of captivity on the wild animals. This essay examines the advantages and disadvantages of zoos to lead us to a possible conclusion whether it is ethical to place animals in captivity. We will also examine if zoos have the best possible facilities to keep animals in captivity. Body One of the advantages of having zoos, is to provide protection to some animals that are endangered.
