The author’s purpose of the article was to explain how zoos do not harm animals, which can also be seen in the title of the article. The audience of The Shorthorn consists of their opinion editor who will be assessing my analysis of the ethos, pathos, and logos appeals to the chosen article. Ganzert’s main claim is that “zoos exist to facilitate and promote the conservation of animals”, her reasons, which are that zoos protect animals from extinctions, preserve genetic biodiversity, and finally they reintroduce critically endangered or extinct species into the wild. If it is true, that zoos protect animals from extinction, then zoos exist to facilitate and promote the conservation of animals. If it is true, that zoos preserve genetic biodiversity, then zoos exist to facilitate and promote the conservation of animals.
Animal captivity costs outweigh the benefits, and the violation of the rights of the individual animals is unjustifiable. Animals everywhere are being taken into captivity on a daily basis for the sole purpose of entertainment and education. Societies opinions of how zoos treat animals and their opinions of whether or not animals should be held in captivity is a common topic in today’s media but yet; hundreds of animals are still dying every year as zoos are still one of the top tourist attractions in the United States. Zoo captivity physically and mentally harms the well-being of animals in more ways than people derive. Solely, there are thousands of pieces of textual evidence and statistics that explain the prime reasons zoos should be abolished entirely.
We should keep Zoos because they help protect, heal, and keep animals safe, they also get a bad reputation because some Zoos do mistreat animals but if we work together we can help protect animals and preserve them. “While public outcry continues on the subject of keeping wild animals in captivity, many institutions work hard to maintain healthy homes for their animals and work toward research and conservation,” according to Opposing Viewpoints Online. This essay discusses Shirley McMarlin and that she is a staff writer at the Tribune-Review in addition she has a amazing viewpoint, Mcmarlin argues that “Zoos are an essential resource.” Zoos are an essential resource for science and etc.
Animals in such facilities are prevented from many important advantages such as gathering and hunting their own food, developing their own social orders, breeding in a natural way and generally behaving in ways that are natural to them. These activities require significantly more liberty and freedom than that allowed to animals in zoos, aquariums and circus. Also for animals that were captured in the wild it takes them a long time
This argument is split into three main viewpoints, the opinion that zoos harm animals, the opinion that zoos save endangered species, and a mix between the two. Viewpoint number three is more of a critique how zoos are good places where bad things happen and should be reformed. Each option has its own individual pros and cons but a reform of zoos and their standards would be the most economical for zoos and aquariums and this method would also be the least harmful and less stressful for the animals involved. The care and wellbeing of the animals involved should be the number one priority of all groups and by cutting back on over breeding, the phasing out of lager animals that naturally roam large distances, and creating environments that’s sole purpose is to educate people, zoos can become a better place for people and animals
Animals in captivity at zoos constantly struggle with problems including stress, boredom, and confinement (Lin). This piece of evidence explains that small habitats in zoos conclude to many health problems. The last way that zoos make
Cohn writes that the medical care for elephants increased significantly that led to the reduction of animal diseases and deaths (716). The elephant enclosures are expanded in order to house more elephants that can form a natural group they typically form in the wild (Cohn 716). Most zoos walk their elephants to ensure they move enough as it is important for their health, moreover, zoo staff encourages natural behavior and, by doing that, surpasses their duties (Cohn 716). Borrell also states that most of the zoos are getting better by constantly changing and improving their programs and housing conditions (9). What is more, they serve as a reminder of success in animal conservation and encourage people to continue working on it (Borrell 9).
THe article states that the zoos are beneficial to the society and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the zoos are not beneficial to the society and he refutes each point of the author 's reasons. First, the article avers that the animales are treated well in the zoos. The professor, by contrast, asserts that the animals are not treated well in the zoos. Moreover, he provides an example of the two bandas that dead in the zoos by a rat 's poinson, tho mangar of the zoo could not prevent that.
I feel that zoos are a safe place for animals. Not only do they provide fun for family's they are a good way to keep endangered animals safe. Another Thing, what if an animal gets hurt in the wild? Nothing but, if they are in zoos they can treat the animals so they do not become endangered or die off completely.
As Zoos demonstrate best practices in operating sustainable, enhancing exhibits to create acceptable homes for the animals in its care, showing important and impactful improvement to the overall zoological garden expertise, the zoo around the world serve to secure a future for each life and wild places. Thus, zoos are a productive and successful strategy for protecting endangered species
Zoos have been saving animals from being in danger. In fact, animals are considered as an important part of humans lives. Some people believed that zoos must be built outside cities because it causes a lot of noise and pollution. The majority says that zoos must be built inside cities because it is a means of entertainment and scientific researches Out in the wild, some animals would have a very little chance to survive, especially those on the endangered list.
Imagine, being taken away from your family, and thrown into a cold, steel, cage. Luckily, people don’t have to worry about that, but all wild animals do. This is what zoo’s do. They carelessly take an animal from their habitat and family, against their will, and take them to an unfamiliar place where you get starved to be trained and stared at. Zoos lie to us, and we don’t even realize it.
Zoos are places where animals are put on displays and where they have to live their entire life. People can visit zoos for money and watch animals like they are in some kind of television show or commercial program what is done for people only. People have to notice that zoos are not people entertainment. It is seems like animals in zoos should be free and live in wildlife where they belong.
People say that zoos are important for education and are a great way for people to learn about exotic animals (Agnew n.p). Researchers cannot learn as much when animals are captive, you can learn just as much or even more while they are in their natural habitat. While some believe that zoos are important for education, they also believe that zoos are necessary for the survival of species (Zoos n.p). Most zoos claim that they take in extinct and needy animals, most animals at zoos aren’t orphaned, extinct, or injured at all (Zoos n.p). Lastly, one big claim is that zoos help conservation of animals (Borrel n.p).
This leads to many concerns from the public on the physical and mental impacts of captivity on the wild animals. This essay examines the advantages and disadvantages of zoos to lead us to a possible conclusion whether it is ethical to place animals in captivity. We will also examine if zoos have the best possible facilities to keep animals in captivity. Body One of the advantages of having zoos, is to provide protection to some animals that are endangered.
