ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Senate

610 Words3 Pages

It has been debated for a while that the senate should be abolished. Not many Canadian’s see the point for a senate because it is a waste of their tax dollars. “After the Senate expense scandal in 2012 iii, many Canadians felt weary and not confident in the system of the senate. Though the people chosen in the senate are seen skeptical and partisan, the senate is a tradition position in the House of Commons that does hold a relevant step in how Canada is how it is. It is important that we do not take out a role in our government that has been going on for years, the possibility of taking something out and having our government not stable because of removing a crucial part in our parliament. Many people do not see appoint in having a Senate, since in their eyes it is useless. But, “the Senate is a distinctive and essential component of the Canadian constitutional order.” iv …show more content…

The scandal expanses made people question the line of work the Senates do, and their relevance in our government system. Even though it is not publically seen what the Senate’s do, their mistake should not make Canadians weary of what
To make the Senate bearable for many, there are a few ways to change it to make everyone satisfied and at ease. A way that can ease the notion to abolish the Senate is to “get rid of it and redesign it.” This gives the opportunity to change up and maybe make a senate a public election so people. A point that is brought up in Tom Flanagan’s article, is to add an “advisory layer ”i to the Senate. It is similar to what Alberta has done allowing the people have more of a say in who gets to be the

Show More
Related

The Pros And Cons Of Queensland's Unicameral System

510 Words | 3 Pages

This argument remains valid in modern debates as the absence of an upper house continues to severely restrict the possibilities by which legislation can be evaluated and amended (Costar 2015). Although it has been determined that the upper house alone is not the cure for attaining an answerable government, it is said that by re-introducing a second chamber in Queensland, a number of valuable functions can be performed. Functions such as the review of legislative proposals at a ministerial and departmental level as well as the control and limit of political power and the ability to protect human rights can be carried out in a way that is not possible alone by a lower house nominated by the government (Aroney 2008, 28). Not only does the upper house act as an extra technique to review and amend changes to legislature, it also has had a profound effect on the ability of the Queensland Parliament to correctly carry out its functions under the Constitution which compel it to act responsibly and review the undertakings of the executive arm of

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Canada Senate

1949 Words | 8 Pages

The Senate in Canada should be abolished Introduction: Canada senate is a part of legislation institution in Canada, which represents the interests of upper class people. Different from America, it is not produced by election but directly-nominated by the premier and appointed by governor. Senate, governor, and the House of Commons are like three legs of a tripod which constitute the congress and legislation system in Canada. Senate undertakes the responsibility of proposing expostulation to governor and cabinet, which acts the role of supervision and restriction. Senate played critical role when Canada established federal government in 1867, the diversity of senators warrants the smooth convey of popular will to governors and legislators coming from different ethnic group and social status.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Canadian Senate Reform

1032 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction The Canadian Senate has been an institution of the country since the multiple negotiations that made possible the establishment of the federation. Section 17 of CA 1867 states that Canada is to have a Parliament comprising a House of Commons (lower house), a Senate (upper house), and the Crown. However, from the parliamentary institutions aforementioned, only the elected members of the House of Commons could claim to have a democratic mandate: the position of the Crown is hereditary, and the governor general that represents it, as well as senators, are appointed (Malcolmson et al. 2021). The. Despite Canadians’ general dissatisfaction with the Senate and ongoing criticism around its undemocratic model, patronage appointments and

Read More

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Section 33 For Canadian

1366 Words | 6 Pages

This is better known as the ‘Notwithstanding Clause’, and has several pros and cons for Canadians. Some of the pros include that the bill ensures that the balance of power stays within the elected government instead of within the courts, the threat to individual rights is minor because of the five year limit on any use of it, and that only some, not all rights are subject to a possible legislative override. The most controversial pro is the fact that that the bill ensures that the balance of power stays within the elected government instead of within the courts. Many feel that it is very valuable that the courts play a role in the elaboration of rights and freedoms, however it not proper for them to act as legislators. In Canada, there is very little evidence that judges are ever selected based on how it is believed they would rule in certain cases, however, if the notwithstanding clause did not exist and the judges did act as legislators, it is safe to believe this would change.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Triple E Senate

388 Words | 2 Pages

To ensure that all Canadians are truly equal, the "Triple E" Senate was created. It stands for effective, equal and elected. Since the Senate is not elected it represents the worst of partisian, political patronage, it lacks all legitimacy. Also, if they are elected they would be accountable to the regions they represent. Overall, some people believe the Senate will never be a legitimate part of the lawmaking body, unless it's members are accountable to the people of Canada through a democratic election process.

Read More

Comparing Trudeau's Charter Of Rights And Freedoms

806 Words | 4 Pages

In order to overcome this challenge, the “notwithstanding” clause was added to the Charter that allowed for Parliament or the provinces to be released from certain parts of the Charter. The provinces also gained a sense of security through the amending formula, which meant that any changes to Charter laws required Parliamentary agreement, as well as the agreement of seven provinces that represent at least 50 percent of the total population of

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Monarchy In Canada

564 Words | 3 Pages

The monarchy in Canada is a continuous debate among the politicians and individuals. This paper aims to present the advantages and disadvantages of the monarchy in Canada. This way will enable us to take a clear position. First, Canadian politics are known for their divisive attitudes, and it is very hard to get consensus on decisions. The Queen plays the role of reference for the Canadian politicians and their decisions.

Read More

Essay On Should Canada Keep Change And Abolish The Senate

712 Words | 3 Pages

Nancy Zhou Social 11A Mr. B September, 17th, 2017 Q: Should Canada keep, change or abolish the senate? The Reason Canada Need to Change the Senate Canada should change the Senate because the senate is useless, undemocratic and costly today. However, the principle of Senate is a good idea, so it is still needed and important. The Senate is a legislative body of the government, which has the almost the same power as the House of Common.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Electoral College

1278 Words | 6 Pages

What did you not see the DraStic change it would make in the political system, such as an incourage multi-party system. A few analysts have thought of ideas that do not abolish it but many Electoral College. Their ideas consist of congressional district allegation, proportional allocation, and the Electoral College with super electors. Under the system of congressional district allegation electors would be apportioned one to each congressional district and then the two Senator electors. This plan can help to expand the campaigns playing field.

Read More

Ministerial Responsibility In Australia

452 Words | 2 Pages

I believe the important thing in parliament is to be subject to the Constitution and Rule of Law. This is to ensure that every one of Australia is treated the same way, equally and fairly. The Constitution provides the basic ruled of government and the Rule of Law ensures that everyone is subject to the law. I believe that the current system couldn’t be improved, this is due to that the current system is fair and deals with issues in parliament

Read More

Political Absolutism In Canada

728 Words | 3 Pages

While researching and analyzing the topic of absolutism, which relates to the conflicts between Liberalism and Conservatism, the conflict arises from both ideologies adhering to their traditional doctrine and belief as well as an absence of flexibility by both sides. I gravitated towards researching different influences on political policy and analyzing these policies and political ideologies from a Stability and Change perspective. Beyond this, I was able to focus specifically on the causes of political Stability and Change within Canadian politics, chiefly federal. Canadian politics lacks the inflexibility highlighted traditional meaning of the word; this has enabled Canada to harass the best of both ideologies, beneficially affecting our society.

Read More

How To Abolish The Senate In Canada Essay

344 Words | 2 Pages

However, abolishing the Senate may not be the best for Canada in the end, so another argument is to reform the Senate. The best plan at the moment to reform the Senate is the Triple E plan, as it would make it so that the Senators are elected, each province is represented equally, making the Senate more effective. If we were to abolish the Senate the only way to do so would be by a constitutional amendment backed by at least seven provinces representing 50 per cent of the population, or one with unanimous provincial

Read More

Argumentative Essay: We Should Keep The Senate In Canada

875 Words | 4 Pages

The Senate: “The upper chamber of Parliament where there are 105 members who are appointed until age 75 by the Crown on the advice if the prime minister.” (Rules of the Game pg 106)The original Senate that was created in 1867 had only originally 72 seats. It was created to counter balance representation population in the House of Commons, although in recent years the Senate has become to reinforce representation of groups that have often been underrepresented in parliament, examples; Aboriginals, visible minorities and women. There has been a huge debate’s on whether Canada should keep the Senate. The people all over Canada have mixed opinions on if we should keep the Senate or not.

Read More

The Benefits Of The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms

1219 Words | 5 Pages

This corrupt system as some refer to it has many people confused and wondering what benefits are for Canadians. A specific case of the Charter being ineffective is the case Arsenault-Cameron v. Prince Edward

Read More

Why Was Pirates Important To World History

162 Words | 1 Pages

Pirates are significant to world history because they helped fuel the colonial economy. Around the fifteen hundreds, there was an increase of trade between Europe and Asia. It became a greater opportunity for merchants. But because England, France, and Holland were latecomers, their government often hire pirateering on robbing gold and silver from Spanish and Portuguese ships and settlements instead. They, later on, became a patriotic hero.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Senate

Related Topics

Open Document