ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Affirmative Action

900 Words4 Pages

Salonek 1
Joseph Salonek
Mr. Junker
9 Civics
27 April 2017
Qualifications for Your Future Affirmative Action is not necessary because colleges spend too much money on diversity training, it strengthens racial stereotypes, and highly qualified people are getting passed over. Some might say that we need Affirmative Action to help minorities that were brought down by the “man”. The fact is, Affirmative Action is doing more bad than it is good. First off, ivy league schools are spending way too much money on a program that does minimal to help impoverished minorities. Yale pledged to spend fifty-million on diversity training for their faculty. Brown spent 100 million for their diversity training (1). This hurts the college students who …show more content…

Lower qualified people are chosen because of race, and higher qualified people are being passed over because of their race (2). The average Asian scores 200 points higher than the average African American, and eighty points higher than the average White person who goes to the same college(1). That means that Asians with higher scores are being passed over for African Americans, and Whites with worse scores. Many people say that these opportunities help poor …show more content…

According to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology when members of different races are mixed together the level of prejudice lowers (1). Affirmative Action does not just help minorities economically, but it helps them socially. When you increase the level of minorities at colleges people are able to live in a place for four years where different races are forced to work together. This will help create a world where everyone is equal, and we can get rid of prejudice because of race, creed, and gender. These things sound good, but Affirmative Action does not lower prejudice, and does not give more opportunities to low income

Show More
Related
508 Words | 3 Pages

Affirmative action in the United States I believe that affirmative action negatively affects on both minorities and majorities. From a minority’s perspective, the idea that minorities can receive benefits from others due to their race, ethnicity, or gender can cause them to feel segregated against anyway. Since the term, ‘minority,’ no longer applies to every females or person of color today, female students or students of color with affluent backgrounds may feel segregated and devalued even when they did not get any special benefit from affirmative action policies. Majorities, in this case, male or white students, will also get discouraged because this can be regarded as a form of reverse discrimination, especially with racial affirmative action programs.

Read More
558 Words | 3 Pages

A Price Floor Only Benefit China Government Prices often play an important role in the economy and they are easy to change too. Therefore, sometimes prices are unfairly high for the buyers, and sometimes it would unfairly low for the sellers. In situation like this, government would set a legal price on how high or low a price may go with a product. Recently, China government sets a price floor on fuel, which is $40 per barrels.

Read More
889 Words | 4 Pages

According to Peter Thiel and David Sacks, "preferences hurt poor whites and even many Asians" (Source G). Whites and Asians, traditionally majority groups in college enrollment, have a disadvantage if affirmative action policies exist. Under affirmative action, these two groups must overcome an additional obstacle they cannot control: their race. As equality applies to all groups, this added disadvantage that whites and Asians face reflects the reverse racism created by affirmative action policies, an inequality unfavorable toward whites and Asians. The inequality becomes even more apparent in cartoons portraying affirmative action as a means through which minorities cheat the admissions system, doing so by utilizing affirmative action as a shortcut to the ultimate goal of admission (Source H).

Read More
845 Words | 4 Pages

After all, it gives minorities what some would call, an unfair advantage. One point Anne Hull makes in her article “Affirmative Action Hurts White People” concerns readers that affirmative action is unconstitutional. She goes into detail by telling the story of a girl named Jennifer Gratz, a white applicant rejected from her dream college. Jennifer claimed that though she had worked extremely hard to have polished credentials, she fell short to a minority student with the same GPA and test scores all because of race. After being rejected, Gratz pursued a lawsuit against the University of Michigan, raising the question if affirmative action is still need in higher education (Hull 31).

Read More
1176 Words | 5 Pages

An outrage among society today; high school students are not being admitted to their dream colleges based on ethnic background. Adolescents should not be burdened by the thought that they won’t get into the college they deserve to attend just based on their skin color. Affirmative Action is the cause of this appalling injustice in the college admissions process among big universities. There have been several cases where people have fought for their right to be admitted solely based on their qualifications. Universities’ use of Affirmative Action, and racial quotas in their admissions process should be exposed and terminated.

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

Abortion is controversial issue, which is debated around the world. People have different views of reason why, it should be permissible or impermissible. Abortion is topic that challenges the ideals of many people’s views. The specific view that is going to be discussed is the Warren and the infanticide objection argument. This argument implies having an abortion should be permissible, but it holds a moral objection to abortion.

Read More
301 Words | 2 Pages

Does the Constitution allow the government to use group classification to benefit the minorities who suffered discrimination historically? Affirmative action are programs used to replenish minorities that were historically discriminated, however has caused much debate. Some critics believe that affirmative action hinders the majority while benefitting the minorities, and testify it as unconstitutional praxis by the 14th amendment. Affirmative action has not broken any constitutional barriers, because it is a notion of equality to minorities from the majority. Affirmative action has been addressed to the Supreme Court in various cases, and has been ruled with mixed decisions.

Read More
219 Words | 1 Pages

Affirmative action programs are not discriminatory, as they rectify past discrimination and inequalities long perpetuated and promoted within a flawed system which has helped the majority. The first reason being It increases diversity. A substantial portion of affirmative action laws usually specify minority percentages for employment, which means that that employers are not allowed to discriminate an individual or refuse to hire him, solely based on the color of his skin or sexual orientation. This policy is a way to make sure that diversity is achieved and maintained in workplaces and schools, thus helping create tolerant communities as it exposes individuals to various ideas and cultures that are different from their own. Secondly, It promotes

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

This idea is conflicted against Affirmative Action however. Affirmative Action aims to help disadvantaged underrepresented minority groups, but it is ironic that most disadvantaged people in this country are white people who

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

Would you want to be paid back for the things that have happened in your family for generations? Affirmative Action is a policy that favors a disadvantaged person or group. A form of affirmative action would be giving a person of color the education they deserve , like getting into the colleges they qualify for. Affirmative action hinders equality by causing suffering and dropouts of minorities. Affirmative Action policies cause suffering or dropouts of certain people.

Read More
1100 Words | 5 Pages

Gary Becker a college professor at the University of Chicago states that “Affirmative Action laws hurt individuals who are supposed to benefit from them and does more harm than good.” (Becker) Becker states “individuals less qualified perform poorer than their more qualified peers in school and in the workplace.” (Becker). Both sides each have valid points to make and evidence to support them. Groups that support and confirm Affirmative Action and there polices are The American Council on Education.

Read More
1640 Words | 7 Pages

Subsequently, already-overrepresented races such as whites would be represented in an even more disproportionate manner. This is not ideal because as in today’s modern world, all races are equal, but this disproportionality undermines that characteristic. Affirmative action helps colleges and universities work towards true diversity, which would be equal representation of all racial groups. However, while that would be a challenging task to accomplish in a short period of time, affirmative action helps jumpstart the journey by providing a means to slowly introduce more diversity on college campuses. Affirmative action is not an end-all solution, but it helps improve the lack of diversity present in colleges and universities today, an issue that needs to be tackled to fulfill the idea that all racial groups should be equal, including in education.

Read More
499 Words | 2 Pages

However, you really wonder that if there was no affirmative action, would the goal of minorities having an equal opportunity be achieved and is this just a game of race? It sure does seem like so. One reason to ban affirmative action is because it truly favors one race over the other. As stated in “Affirmative Action: Overview”, it argues that those who oppose this action believe that it “causes a form of reverse discrimination by [preferring] one group over another, based on racial preference rather than academic achievement”, which serves unconstitutional in a way by providing advantages to the minority and defeats the purpose of what America established in the past to make everyone equal.

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

Affirmative action has become obsolete in today’s society. Affirmative action is an active effort to improve the employment or educational opportunities of members of minority groups and women; also: a similar effort to promote the rights or progress of other disadvantaged persons (Merriam-Webster, 2011). Today’s affirmative action will demoralize the very concepts that the policy was implemented to uphold: those of equality for all people regardless of color and discrimination. This policy supports racial multiplicity at the price of distinction, impartiality and experience; it also follows the line of reverse discrimination and sexual bias against white men (Reyna, Tucker, Korfmacher, & Henry, 2005).

Read More
883 Words | 4 Pages

However, advocates are aware of the failures that exist in affirmative action; for instance, racial injustices and poverty (Gu, McFerran, Aquino, & Kim, 2014). The primary liability of affirmative action is not in its intent or original design. It lies in its economic and political process which has unemployment and inequity constructed on it. Unless these issues are dealt with, no solution will be attained to resolve racial inequities and economic and social injustice.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Affirmative Action

Related Topics

Open Document