More handpicked essays just for you.
Impacts affirmative action in higher education
Affirmative action then and now
Affirmative action then and now
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the same way, I think that affirmative action does have its setbacks as well as advantages. However, my position on affirmative action is that I stand against affirmative action on education. [unfair] One reasoen to be against affirmative action is because it does not leave people with the fair advantage such as the minority. Let us say that someone has 12 cupcakes and 6 of them are reserved for the non-minority. The six of the non-minority has already took the last of the 6 cupcakes and.
When people think about affirmative action, the first thing that comes to their mind is positive discrimination. That is not quite right. Affirmative action is necessary in order to achieve equal opportunity, especially in the fields of higher education and employment. Affirmative action should not be banned or regulated because it gives women and people from ethnic and social minorities the chance of obtaining the job they want or studying at the school they choose. Affirmative action is very important system to our society and employers should dedicate all their resources to ensure that people are not discriminated against on the basis of their ethnic group or their gender.
Affirmative action in the United States I believe that affirmative action negatively affects on both minorities and majorities. From a minority’s perspective, the idea that minorities can receive benefits from others due to their race, ethnicity, or gender can cause them to feel segregated against anyway. Since the term, ‘minority,’ no longer applies to every females or person of color today, female students or students of color with affluent backgrounds may feel segregated and devalued even when they did not get any special benefit from affirmative action policies. Majorities, in this case, male or white students, will also get discouraged because this can be regarded as a form of reverse discrimination, especially with racial affirmative action programs.
Affirmative action is a tool that is used to ensure that minority groups are granted equal opportunity. Whether it be college admissions, or in the workplace, affirmative action makes it possible for all people to enjoy the same opportunities despite skin color, gender, or nationality. Affirmative action was started by President John F. Kennedy. President Kennedy started affirmative action to make sure that during the hiring process, and also during employment, that all employees were treated the same, despite their race or nationality. Thereafter, President Lyndon B. Johnson followed up by making it a requirement for government to hire without counting race, religion, nationality, or gender against applicants.
“Affirmative Action may not be a perfect system, but there should be no doubt that it has endangered many successes. It has opened the doors of America’s most elite educational institutions to minority students, granting them unprecedented opportunities” (Ogletree 12). Thanks to Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson a policy that prohibits employment and education discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, and sex is offered today to those who suffer from said discriminations (A Brief History). Affirmative action has opened abundant openings for minorities, allowing the cycle of going to college to be passed down generations and provided job opportunities that otherwise would not be considered by most. Affirmative
As a result, the suggestion that affirmative action had many downsides emerged in the public mind. In view of many scholars, the major drawback of the affirmative action is that white people could turn to be a minority. Furthermore, affirmative action is seen as discrimination of the minorities due to its nature to discriminate either blacks or whites and search for the favor for only one
Proposition 209, a ban on affirmative action passed in 1996, resulted in improved graduation rates (Chingos par. 5). This increase is due to better matching of students with schools. Since the banning of affirmative action programs in California schools increased graduation rates, other states should follow this example. Although this occurs, some may say that affirmative action programs are still necessary to make up for years of discrimination and unequal
A research directed by Professor Douglas S. Massey, Margarita Mooney and Kimberly C. Torres from Princeton University, stated that “41 percent of the "blacks" at the Ivy League colleges were not "American blacks"( Driscoll and Newton 2). Although these “blacks” help increase diversity at the Ivy League colleges, the problems here is that Affirmative Action was designed to end segregation in the United States so that the offspring of minority groups who struggled in US history can also get the chance to go to school, but the reality is a huge percent of black people in elite higher education institution are actually socioeconomically advantaged immigrants. Therefore, Affirmative Action does not reach its essential
Research conducted by Wendy Moore points out that the history behind affirmative action was inherently biased towards minorities, although contradictory to its goal. Although she indicates in her article that affirmative action alone will not end the long history of discrimination and inequality in institutions and that affirmative action policies have been diluted in recent times. The latest understanding of affirmative action policies has been widely used as a band-aid to stop further controversies, historically it has also been used as this band-aid to cover centuries of racial inequality, and to show a diverse and fair American culture. For a deeper repair of inequality, affirmative action policies can not be diluted any further. The band-aid-like fix of affirmative action is showing to have an impact, while at times seeming small, the small fixes are still making a difference.
Affirmative action is normally used within education circumstances;
Affirmative action has become obsolete in today’s society. Affirmative action is an active effort to improve the employment or educational opportunities of members of minority groups and women; also: a similar effort to promote the rights or progress of other disadvantaged persons (Merriam-Webster, 2011). Today’s affirmative action will demoralize the very concepts that the policy was implemented to uphold: those of equality for all people regardless of color and discrimination. This policy supports racial multiplicity at the price of distinction, impartiality and experience; it also follows the line of reverse discrimination and sexual bias against white men (Reyna, Tucker, Korfmacher, & Henry, 2005).
But because of the devaluing of merit and accomplishment that comes within affirmative action, Johnny is failing his way through classes that are then plummeting him into a deep debt of student loans without any academic credits to show for those big dollars. Had he just been accepted to the school that matched his merit abilities he would be putting those pretty pennies towards A’s and B’s, as curriculum with a touch less of academic rigor would suit him just fine. Now, I’ve got the merit and the academic ability to soar at that institution. But because affirmative action makes way for reverse racial discrimination, I will not have the chance to excel. Instead, my hard-work of high test scores and GPA will be devalued against the color of my skin.
Today in the world there are many cases of affirmative action. Affirmative action is a policy that favors those who have suffered from discrimination. This happens mostly in education and employment. President Johnson had passed the bill which was first introduced by President Kennedy. President Johnson passed the bill to redress discrimination that had persisted in spite of civil right laws and constitutional guarantees.
Affirmative action is a messy, brute force method of trying to close the enrollment gap. Although on paper it may seem like a good idea to require colleges to admit a certain number of students of color, it actually gives an unfair advantage to minorities. A white student and a student of color with identical grades, test scores, and resumes do not have an equal chance of getting into the same college because one student belongs to a minority. Affirmative action causes the same problem it attempts to solve in reverse. Ashley K., a student who gave her opinion to the New York Times, says that she is “being given an advantage in college admissions” based on her race.
Affirmative action is one of the most controversial issues between scholars, academics, professionals, and in the forum of public opinion in general. It has been extended to all public services, education, as well as military and private workplace issues. Extreme diverse opinions have been raised throughout many years since the affirmative action took a place. I believe that the core issue might be that there is a general lack of familiarity among the general public what term affirmative action does actually mean. Affirmative action or positive discrimination is a program providing advantages for people of a minority group or who are seem to have been traditionally historically discriminated against.
