ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

1042 Words5 Pages

Due to a mascara causing a women to go blind, he United States Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, which was passed in 1938, which encouraged companies to utilize animal testing to further test the safety level of chemicals used in their products. Furthermore, it was not until the year 1991 that the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods was created in an effort to establish valid alternatives to animal testing. This depicts how when the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act was passed, reasonable alternative options were not accessible for companies to use, supporting the reason over why they were forced to turn to animal testing. But now, there are plenty of alternative tests that can be used over animal testing in the cosmetic industry. …show more content…

For instance, using in Vitro International Corrositex (synthetic skin) has the ability to “provide a chemical corrosivity determination in as little as 3 minutes to four hours”, compared to “animal testing that often takes two to four weeks” (neavs.org). Moreover, an alternative test, DakDak, used to measure the accuracy of sunscreens, was “reported to do in days what it takes animal studies months to do” (neavs.org). Alternatives to animal testing are able to approve of chemicals in a more timely manner. Because of this, companies that chose to utilize these methods are able to approve of chemicals in a more timely manner, demonstrating why these methods should be enforced compared to animal …show more content…

When animals are used to approve of chemicals for use in cosmetic products, they endure “skin and eye irritation tests where chemicals are rubbed onto the shaved skin or dripped into the eyes of rabbits” (hsi.org). These tests can easily be prevented by the use of alternative tests, which typically involve human cells compared to live animals. Moreover, “Approximately 100,000-200,000 animals” die per year worldwide for testing within the cosmetics industry.” (hsi.org) Despite this number counting the amount of animal tested deaths in the cosmetic industry worldwide, it is a exponential number considering over “40 countries have banned cosmetic testing on animals” (humanesociety.org). These statistics demonstrate how significant the problem of animal testing within the cosmetic industry is by depicting how many animals are negatively affected

Show More
Related
302 Words | 2 Pages

We are so lucky to have animals in the world. I mean, what better living creatures to use than rodents, rabbits, guinea pigs and hamsters for experimentation. Several popular beauty and cosmetic brands including Maybelline, Avon, Rimmel London, Covergirl and even Dove, test their products or ingredients on animals. Regardless of this having effects on their sales, companies perform this act for our safety and so that our mascaras don’t make our eyelashes fall out or our shampoos won’t make us bald. Most importantly, it’s done for proof when injured customers sue.

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

South Korea’s National Health and Welfare committee has just recently created a bill that will ban the uses of cosmetics and its ingredients, but it only works against areas that have an alternative to their cause (Miles). This is a great example of how laws that are supposed to fight animal testing just allow advocates of it to evade the laws’ restrictions. Further on the topic, in the nineteenth-century more companies led to the increased use of animals in testing, and subsequently, groups that set out to oppose the use of animals in scientific experiments (Murnaghan). That battle between those advocates and enemies of animal testing is still present and very alive today. Animal testing causes animals to suffer and does not benefit humans,

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

Purpose: To inform the audience about animal testing I. Introduction A. Attention getting device: Approximately 26 million animals are used every year in US laboratories for cosmetic and biomedical research. B. Thesis: I would like to inform you about how animal testing is conducted. C. Credibility: I have read and studied the articles about animal testing. D. Preview: I am going to share with you purposes of animal testing, how animals are used in laboratory tests, and the effectiveness of animal testing.

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction Paragraph: Some think that animal testing is the right thing to do, but others think that it is a harsh and cruel thing to do to living things. The work you have done has promoted the idea that it is perfectly ok to test your cosmetic products on creatures that have no say in the matter. Should you be allowed to torture these animals? What gives you the right to hurt them when they are innocent creatures that feel pain and suffer terribly? It's clear to the general public that overall animal testing should not be done.

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

Take a moment and think about your daily routine. You wash your hair with your Head & Shoulders shampoo, wash your body with your Dove soap, do your makeup with your favorite MAC or Maybelline products, and spray some Marc Jacob’s perfume and then you are ready to go, right? Well, did you ever consider how these products are tested before being sold? It is said that, “Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year” (11 Facts About Animal Testing). A number of companies around the United States use animal testing as a method to examine the safeness of a product.

Read More
1267 Words | 6 Pages

Although most females have worn makeup at one time or other animals have played a huge factor in the area of makeup experimentation. For example, rabbits who are the subjects used to determine if a given chemical product can possibly cause an allergic reaction to consumers. The Los Angeles Times states, “ Human beings spend countless dollars developing toxic chemicals not to mention millions of animal lives testing those same chemicals” (Frisk 1) It has been documented that most makes consumers do not realize that the mascara they once used was tested on a rabbit. The toxic chemical that companies were forced to remove blinded the animals subjects. Further, humans spend large amounts of money the resulting of toxic waste.

Read More
1234 Words | 5 Pages

By putting a ban on animal testing it has set alternative methods in motion. An article by The Odyssey said if cosmetic companies do not change their practices and find alternatives for testing their products they will not be able to distribute or sell those products in the countries that have bans on animal testing. One of the many alternatives is in Vitro International Corrositex, a synthetic skin model based on real human cell tissue. In vitro testing can provide results in as little as three minutes to four hours, when animal testing takes up to two or four weeks (Neaves). Companies can also buy or grow human skin cultures to perform skin irritation tests without using animals

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

Lowering human suffering is one reason of using animals in research. New cosmetics, which can in particular carry significant risks with their use, are usually tested by

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

Because of the harm done to the animal subjects, this testing is opposed by animal rights activists and others, and is banned in much of the European Union. Using animal testing in the development of cosmetics may involve testing either a finished product or the individual ingredients of a finished product on animals, often rabbits, but also mice, rats, and other animals. Not all companies who provide cosmetics are using animals to test their products on. Cosmetics manufacturers who genuinely do not test on animals generally use the following for safety testing of their products: reliance on existing natural or synthetic ingredients, compounds and substances, which have already been extensively tested on animals; avoiding novel ingredients or combinations of ingredients that have not been fully tested and may not be safe; testing on human volunteers/clinical trials. This presumes that cosmetics companies are already using computer modeling and cell cultures to simulate human tissue, two techniques that have had ambiguous utility in discovering problems early.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

In recent discussions of new medicine and cosmetics, a controversial issue has been whether animals should be used for scientific testing or should not be used for testing at all. On the one hand, many argue that using animals in experiments is cruel and ineffective. From this perspective, it has been proven that animals cannot contract some of the same diseases that humans can. This causes extensive experiments that harms the animals and wastes time and money. On the other hand, however, using animals in scientific research has been beneficial to medicine for decades.

Read More
1392 Words | 6 Pages

Animal testing is a very serious issue, considering the fact that it kills one-hundred thousand to two-hundred thousand animals each year (“About”). Many companies do not believe that animal testing is a serious problem and find that there are other important issues to worry about. The FDA believes that animal tests should be replaced with other tests that do not involve the use of animals because of the harm it causes them (“Animal Testing and Cosmetics”). Animals have emotions and feelings just as humans do, even though they are not always noticeable. Although animal-tested cosmetic products are very popular and used everyday by most people, animals are being hurt and killed daily to create them, therefore they should be banned from being

Read More
1866 Words | 8 Pages

Henceforth, as animal testing increased, so did the controversy surrounding it (“Animal testing,” n.d.). Moreover, with the help of animal testing, various treatments and medicines are developed for unconventional diseases. Although animal testing may seem ruthless, animals are used for experimental research that contributes to science if there are no other possible substitutes. Animal testing is a debatable topic that still continues to be one until this time. Animal experimentation should persist because it saves human’s life from diseases, ensures cosmetics’ safety, and improves medical

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

Also there is the LD50 Test: A toxicity test used in animal testing that is performed until 50 percent of the animals are dead. Animals should not be required to be tested on before the use of a medical drug, cosmetic, or food additive. The use of animals in cosmetic experiments is immoral and wrong. The immoral and wrong practices can be shown through “the use of bunnies to test eye irritation to make sure the makeup is safe for humans, though testing is not required by law.”

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

Is Animal Testing Worth It? Every single year, over 100 million animals are mutilated, burned, poisoned, and killed for the sake of cosmetic and drug testing in the United Stated alone (11 Facts about…). A majority of these animals end up looking motley with blood and dye, emaciated, or dead. A lot of cosmetic companies furtively claim to be cruelty free, but they belong to ‘parent companies’ that authorize and perform animal testing.

Read More
1028 Words | 5 Pages

Animals testing on cosmetic products is unethical A. Animals testing is cruel to animals 1. Unethical scientists hurt animals physically a. For example, they put the cosmetic and medicines into the rabbit’s eyes, which make their eyes fester, swell, pain and death are generally the end results b. The experimenter take out dog’s vocal chords so that they don’t disturb their testing c. The experimenters will use the animals again for further testing until they die, these nightmare to them will repeat and repeat 2. Unethical scientists hurt animals mentally a. Animals and human are similar in many ways.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document