ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

1282 Words6 Pages

“More than 100 million animals are poisoned, burned, crippled, and abused in other ways in U.S. labs each year” (“Top Five Shocking”). Animal testing has become a deeply divided subject, with strong justification supporting each side. The debate regarding the ethics of this controversial practice is ongoing. Supporters of animal experimentation argue the viewpoint in which it must continue because of the enormous scientific research that animal models provide. Others, however, insist that all animal experimentation should come to an end. The pros and cons of animal testing have been undeviating since the beginning of animal testing history. The use of animals for medical research is said to be ethical if it contributes to scientific developments. …show more content…

The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals ("Animal Testing - ProCon.org"). As stated by the AALAS Foundation, “In the United States, 7% of the population have diabetes. Over 1 million new cases of diabetes are diagnosed each year, and based on death certificate data, diabetes contributed to nearly 225,000 deaths in 2002 alone” ("Benefits of Animal Research”). With diabetes being such a common and unfortunate illness, an experiment took place in which dogs had their pancreas’ removed, which was crucial to the development of insulin. The polio vaccine was tested on animals and reduced the global occurrence of the disease from 350,000 cases in 1988 to only 223 cases in 2012. The AALAS Foundation took a further examination towards the disease and discovered, “Today, the disease has been eliminated from most of the world; only 16 countries worldwide have cases of polio in limited areas (Cornell University Feline Health Center; UNICEF)” ("Benefits of Animal Research”). Research involving animals has also helped identify the causes of high blood pressure and the development of more effective drugs to control the issue. Along with humans, animals also benefit from biomedical research. With much additional work necessary in order to explain certain diseases and treatments, the AALAS Foundation reported, “Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukemia virus (FeLV) infections are major causes of death in cats. In the U.S., it is estimated that 2–3% of all cats are infected with one or both of these diseases” ("Benefits of Animal Research”). Dogs and cats have been frequently tested on in order to advance medicine used for illnesses in their own species. An additional point which supports testing on animals is the span of their life

Show More
Related
643 Words | 3 Pages

Without animal testing, medicine that we are familiar with today wouldn’t exist. Animal testing has enabled us to find treatments for cancer, infections, for antibiotics, and even for vaccines. For seven years, an epidemic of one of the world’s most feared diseases shattered lives across the entire continent of North America. This killer disease,

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

Furthermore, some major ethical issues with animal testing is that animals are often forced to suffer diseases, injuries, and live in isolated cages awaiting death by the end of the study; but, even though researchers try to reduce the pain, “they aren’t able to completely prevent any pain from occurring” since animals are living beings. Animals experience a considerable amount of pain and are subjected to all kinds of suffering including testing as awful as forced diseases, injuries, and enduring a life of isolated captivity. However, when the scientist no longer needs the animal, the animal is put to sleep without any thought about the animal’s life or purpose; so, this poor treatment of animals is morally wrong because animals live and breathe just as humans do and should be treated with more respect. Because much of medical research has nothing to do with animal testing, there seems no reason to continue this kind of animal abuse for animal testing is obviously not the core of medical progressions. Also, alternatives in the medical field are being made to replace animal testing, so animals no longer have to deal with the torture they have been subjected to, and these alternatives will most likely advance the medical field more than animal testing has advanced the medical field.

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

The discovery of over 160 drugs and vaccines (Sun n.p.) has been through the use of animal testing. “Some other medical advancements that have been discovered through animal testing include penicillin, blood transfusions, insulin (that controls blood sugar levels of diabetics), kidney transplants, and vaccines for polio and meningitis (Sun n.p.). ” Almost every medical breakthrough has come from testing on animals. The polio vaccination, from the polio diseased, has reduced tremendously over the years due to animal testing.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing has become a double-edged sword topic all around the world. Researchers believe that it is morally ethical to conduct extreme research procedures on animals when it is unethical to conduct on humans. Research is responsible for many medical breakthroughs and an important factor to the development of medical advances is the inclusion of animals in research. Medical research with the help of animal testing has prevented hepatitis B, measles, etc. (Karayiannis et al. 2004).

Read More
860 Words | 4 Pages

Opponents of animal testing say that it is inhumane and barbaric. Personally, reasonable experiments on animal testing that are for the benefit of mankind, are morally acceptable. Any acts of animal testing that help humans survive and grow

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

26 million animals are used every single year in the US for scientific, and commercial testing. Animals are usually used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of certain medications, or any products meant for human use, or other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. Testing on animals has been lasting from at least 500 BC. Some good uses for animal testing that has come out to be good is that it had brought us development of many life-saving treatments for both animals and humans.

Read More
1262 Words | 6 Pages

The testing of animals has prevented millions of cases of over 200 diseases within animals. In humans, the development of vaccinations for multiple diseases has come from animal testing. This article’s purpose was to tell the achievements that animal testing has accomplished over the years. It also showed that animal testing does not only help humans but animals too. I am going to include this information in my paper to show the people who are fighting against animal testing are fighting improvements with humans and animals.

Read More
1787 Words | 8 Pages

A decrease in animal testing will not only help animals, but it will help science. Although some say that scientific experimentation is not a cruel endeavor (using reasons such as proper handling, maintaining the health of the animal, and the replication of the animals’ natural environments being taught to students in order to preserve uncontaminated results), animals still die by the millions unnecessarily each year (“Ratting” 2). Ending all animal testing immediately is highly irrational and improbable. There is already a gradual decrease in animal experimentation, but humanity has to decrease animal testing at a higher rate, removing all unnecessary forms of experimentation by using alternatives, and eventually,

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past few decades. There are many reasons why animals are tested on. For example, in some cases, animal testing is done purely for cosmetic and superficial purposes. However, testing on animals can also lead to the advancement of our scientific understanding. Without animal testing, the cure for polio would not exist and diabetics would suffer or die from their disease.

Read More
269 Words | 2 Pages

Animals should not be tested on. It is cruel, not effective 100% of the time, and there are better

Read More
906 Words | 4 Pages

Specific cases mentioned include the medical breakthrough for diabetes. This breakthrough in the medical field is all thanks to the removal of the pancreases of dogs and the discovery of insulin. Another supporting claim the association made to support their opinion is the fact that the testing of the polio vaccine on animals resulted in reducing the global disease from 350,000 cases in 1988 to 27 cases in 2016. Without animal testing major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, and tuberculosis. The development of pacemakers, cardiac valves substitutes, and anesthetics have all been contributions of animal testing (ProCon).

Read More
174 Words | 1 Pages

There are many people that say they should not be tested on. they say that it is unethical and the reasons are experimenting on animals is always unacceptable because it causes suffering to animals,the benefits to human beings are not proven, any benefits to human beings that animal testing does provide could be produced in other ways. The case for animal experiments is that they will produce such great

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

Testing on animals has helped to cure many diseases over the years. Every time a new vaccine or medicine is given to the public is probably been tested on animals to make sure that it is safe. No one wants to take or drink drugs that are harmful to them. Colin Blakemore states, “Patient might not know that the powerful new drugs Avastin (for vowel, breast and lung cancer) and Herceptin (for breast cancer) were developed after research on mice.” In other words, Blakemore asserts that usually when patient get the cures they don’t realize that they have been established due to the tests on animals.

Read More
1477 Words | 6 Pages

Animal testing is controversial, with people supporting it and arguing that it is necessary for scientific progress. In contrast, many other people believe that it is cruel and unnecessary. There have been many studies done on animal testing, but one of the most important is 2007 by the National Academy of Sciences, which reported how often

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

The United States experiments and tests on an estimated number of 26 million animals annually, for the purpose of scientific research. The outcome of these tests are used to create medications, determine the safety of human-use products, and many other medical, profitable, and health care uses. Gathering research from a living animal is a practice that has been done for hundreds of years, but now in the modern world society is questioning whether this practice is safe and humane. While the idea of animal testing may be challenged, this method is the most optimal source of research for medical advances and should continue to be practiced. Animal testing has allowed for the development and advancement of many medicines that have been known

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document