More handpicked essays just for you.
Is it ethical to use animals for testing
Animal testing studies
Advantages and disadvantages with testing with animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The tests can be misleading. Some chemicals that are harmful to animals prove valuable when used by humans. In fact aspirin is dangerous for some animal species, but we use it all the time. Another drug Fk-506(tacrolimus) was almost cancelled because of animal test results. I don’t think we should use animals for testing because they may be close to our liking but their results can’t determine if a drug is safe or
Many people believe that animals have a different anatomy than humans, therefore, scientists should not rely on animal testing. In contrast, others say that it’s safer to test medicines on animals before giving them to people; in this way scientists make sure that their medicines are not toxic, nor harmful to humans. Further,
Over 100 million animals are used as test subjects in the world, with approximately 26 million of them in the United States. Sadly, a majority of the time the products that are being tested on animals are not even effective once human trials begin. Consumers might object that if the products were tested to be safe on animals then they would be safe for humans. Yet, 92% of the times the products actually work in animal trials they are later deemed too dangerous or uneffective for people. Which means that most of the animals used in scientific testing are being abused for no apparent reason.
So, using animals is really useless because just because a drug is safe for an animal does not mean it will necessarily be accurate and safe for humans. PISC scientist Gilly Stoddard says “it is unconscionable that animals are dying as a result of the failure to update testing guidelines.” (O’Driscoll 8) Animals should not be dying because humans are using them for inaccurate tests.
Considering Alternative Methods: If you’re still in the camp ‘principally against anything anthropocentric’, then that’s fine. It also means you’re going to consider any animal testing outright wrong, if it’s purpose is to make discoveries for humans. That’s why alternative methods are so important, because they allow us to avoid human extinction – which would cause the extinction of all other animals – without committing the sins of humanity that Maheny talks about. If you’re pro-anthropocentric, but also get pleasure in needlessly slaughtering animals, then allow me to elaborate on just how ‘needless’ this slaughtering really is.
Animal testing has been in our world as early as the 1920’s according to an online article titled, “Product Testing: Toxic and Tragic”. Studies show that it is the law for products to be tested on animals before they are released. More than half of the animals die, and half the products that were tested do not even work. The animals that do survive do not get treated to get better, they get put to sleep. In an online article, it also tells us that 92 percent of the drugs tested on those animals “fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work” (11 Facts About Animal Testing).
Animal testing has allowed the eradication of Smallpox from earth and Polio from North America. Research on animals helps in medical innovation. Animals can be used to determine the safety of a medical product. Animal testing allows a better understanding on medical questions and issues involving human beings and if such questions and issues would harm them. The research and testing of animals, and its positive result in making groundbreaking discoveries outweighs the cons tremendously.
Troy Daum November 8th, 2017 AEPS 110 The Moral Efficacy of Animal Experimentation on Invertebrates Animal experimentation is a practice that spans thousands of years and has been crucial to the advancement of scientific knowledge in a broad range of disciplines from health and medicine to genetics. The earliest writings of scientific inquiry through this means traces back to the Ancient Greeks, which describe dissections of farm animals as an “experimental method of testing surgical procedures before applying them to human patients” (Greek & Greek 2004). In more recent history, philosophers, animal activists, and scientists alike have called in to question the virtue of certain controversial methods used by researchers to conduct experiments. Organizations such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) are well known on the world stage for their
Millions upon millions of animals are killed mercilessly every year due to these experiments. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (Animal). Not only does this testing waste animal lives, but humans as well. Because animal testing is so ineffective, many humans have contracted illness, irritations, mental problems, etc. because of these drugs being successful on animals and not humans.
Have you ever heard of the topic about medical testing on animals? If so and you are interested in learning more, you came to the right place. My claim is that medical testing on animals does more harm than good. My first main point is medical testing on animals causes harm to the animal. My second main point is medical testing on animals can kill the animal.
When it comes to the topic of testing the consumer products before putting them out on the market, a controversial issue has been whether animal testing is still viable or not. On one hand, many people such as protesters are against animal testing and experimentation. They say its cruel and inhumane, there’s other ways to test products other than on animals. On the other hand, some argue that it’s viable, it makes products safe for us to use, and has helped discover treatments for diseases. Some medical procedures tested on animals has led to millions of lives being saved, benefiting us.
So where do they get these animals? Dogs and cats may be purchased from dog pounds or puppy mills. They may be caught in the wild or animals from an overpopulated zoo. Some species were driven to near extinction. Trapping wild monkeys in India diminished entire populations of them.
The subject of animal experimentation is an on-going debate that many argue about today. There are a variety of animals that are commonly used for biomedical research such as mice, rats, birds, dogs, cats, etc. Many different research is used for testing, breeding, defense research, and toxicology, including cosmetics testing. There are legitimate reasons for both sides of this argument, of whether it is okay to use animals to test human products, but when do the pros outweigh the cons? Or vice versa?
Throughout time humans have tested many types of things on animals to see if it is safe for humans to use. Today many companies that produce products like shampoo, drugs and many other products test their products on animals before they will sell it to the public. In china it is mandatory for all products to be tested on animals before they reach the public. Throughout recent years animal experimentation has become a very controversial topic. Many people say that animal testing is an evil and cruel thing to do to animals, But many people say that animal testing is a necessary evil because we need to know if products today are safe to use on humans.
More than 100 million animals including cats and dogs, are poisoned, burned, crippled, and abused in U.S. labs each year. No matter how cruel, redundant, or painful an experiment may be, none of them are illegal. Even when valid alternatives to animals are available, the law does not require that they be used. Also, ninety two percent of experimental drugs that are safe on animals fail in human clinical trials because they either do not work or are dangerous. Even though it is cruel to the animals, not always effective, and there are existing alternatives, animal testing is still used around the world every day, but is animal testing necessary?
