ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

1020 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: History of animal testing essay

Throughout time humans have tested many types of things on animals to see if it is safe for humans to use. Today many companies that produce products like shampoo, drugs and many other products test their products on animals before they will sell it to the public. In china it is mandatory for all products to be tested on animals before they reach the public. Throughout recent years animal experimentation has become a very controversial topic. Many people say that animal testing is an evil and cruel thing to do to animals, But many people say that animal testing is a necessary evil because we need to know if products today are safe to use on humans.
“Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year” (PETA). One of the many reasons that animal testing is a cruel thing to do. In China where animal testing is mandatory, 37 dogs were burned with napalm, 26 dogs were burned so severely their brains swelled, and 24 dogs were deliberately scalded and suffered steam inhalation injuries” (NAVS). They burn the animals so they can look at their organs after to see what happens to them.
Most drugs that pass animal testing don't work on humans because the are too dangerous or they won’t work at all. “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical …show more content…

Humans should invest in finding a different way of finding out if these products are safe on humans."lethal dose" tests, in which animals are forced to swallow large amounts of a test chemical to determine the dose that causes death.” Many animals are forced to endure the pain and suffering we cause, to see how much of this chemical we know is toxic would kill

Show More
Related
800 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is not necessary because the results produced by animals are dissimilar to those of humans. According to the National Anti-Vivisection Society, “Different species… metabolize drugs and are affected by disease differently. No one model can accurately recapitulate the human condition because animals are not people.” Moreover,

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

Test on animals may not work on humans. 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fails on human clinical trials. When they test drugs on animals and it works, most of the time it won’t work on humans. Tests on animals are flawed. 87% of the studies on rodents and primates failed to randomize the selection of animals.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Marc Bekoff, Ph.D. professor at University of Colorado in Boulder, explains that the vast majority of drugs, 92 percent according to the FDA, that pass tests on animals do not happen to work on humans (Bekoff). Scientists cannot accurately predict how a chemical will behave on a human because less that 10 percent of the human illnesses being tested for are seen in animals. That would make sense because animals are completely different when compared to a human. If animal testing is just based on a bunch of luck, than it is wasteful to be testing on an animal. Dr. Ronald Davis of Stanford University has a negative interpretation on animal testing.

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

In “Animal Testing is Bad Science” states that “The Federal Drug Administration has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal test fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous.” This shows that doing experiments on animals are unreliable and do not always have the same effect on humans. In addition, animal experimentation is unethical and unreliable and it puts the animals in

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

For example, animal testing was conducted for the drug Vioxx. Positive outcomes were recorded in animals like mice. Vioxx was approved by the Federal Drug Administration and distributed to humans. 27,000 heart attacks were recorded in human use. This is just one instance where animal testing results failed to predict the human results of using such a drug.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

The fact of the matter can be stated in the most simple words, animal testing doesn’t give sufficient information for human matters. According to Cruelty Free International, only 6% of the 4,300 international companies involved in drug development has registered a new drug with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration since 1950. Which would mean

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing has been banned in many countries around the world, except for America, Canada, Australia, and a few others (Cole). Animal life is deteriorating for numerous, unacceptable reasons, one being animal experimentation. In the span of one year, three hundred thousand animals perish in China (Cole). The extreme numbers are the consequences of animals being tormented from the unnecessary trials (Cole). Others claim that animal experimentation is the most favorable method of evaluating new products.

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

The United States experiments and tests on an estimated number of 26 million animals annually, for the purpose of scientific research. The outcome of these tests are used to create medications, determine the safety of human-use products, and many other medical, profitable, and health care uses. Gathering research from a living animal is a practice that has been done for hundreds of years, but now in the modern world society is questioning whether this practice is safe and humane. While the idea of animal testing may be challenged, this method is the most optimal source of research for medical advances and should continue to be practiced. Animal testing has allowed for the development and advancement of many medicines that have been known

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

Millions upon millions of animals are killed mercilessly every year due to these experiments. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (Animal). Not only does this testing waste animal lives, but humans as well. Because animal testing is so ineffective, many humans have contracted illness, irritations, mental problems, etc. because of these drugs being successful on animals and not humans.

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

Animal experimentation is an extremely unique topic to write about because it isn’t every day that you hear about it in the news and I would like to bring it to people’s attention for that very reason. Animal experimentation leads as far back as 300-200 BC and has continued until this very day and will into the future. During testing, many animals are used including mice, fish, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs/ hamsters, farm animals, birds, cats and dogs, mini-pigs, and non-human primates (monkeys, and in some countries, chimpanzees). Although animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments, the drugs that pass animal tests are not always safe for humans to consume or

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing in the United States provides minimal benefits for the amount of pain and distress animals must endure. Animals are given artificially induced conditions, that they would not receive naturally, and experimented on. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has stated that ninety-four percent of drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials. The experimentation of animals is not only ineffective, but cruel and inefficient for the United States. With such negative affects alternate ways have been produced to combat the mistreatment of animals.

Read More
1686 Words | 7 Pages

There have been numerous recorded examples of drugs that have worked on animals, but then proceeded to not work on humans. Animal testing is misleading, “94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials” (Nine). Not only does this prove that animal testing is ultimately ineffective, but it also shows how the deceiving results could potentially cause harm to humans. For example, in the 1950s a sleeping pill called thalidomide was commercially released as it was proved to be effective on animals. However, the pill went on to cause more than 10,000 babies to be born with birth defects (Science).

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

It is required by law to have all drugs tested on animals before they can be tested on humans. They test on animals to make sure human patients are given a safe dose of a drug. Some patients feel safe and are more likely to trust medicines if they know that they have

Read More
1147 Words | 5 Pages

In comparison to animal testing, in vitro testing and other alternative methods are vastly cheaper and more cost-effective processes. For example, according to the New England Anti-Vivisection Society, “the DakDak test (used to measure the efficacy of sunscreens in preventing skin damage) can provide data for five or six products at less than half the cost of testing one product in animals” (“Limitations and Dangers”). What this means is that companies can test multiple products at once at a lower cost, which would, in turn, save them ample amounts of money each year and increase their profits. Additionally, the National Institute of Health, a government-funded medical research agency, spends a large sum of their budget on animal research. According to the National Anti-Vivisection Society, “approximately 47% of NIH-funded grants have an animal research-based component” (“The Animal Testing and Experimentation Industry”).

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

The differences between animals and humans are too great not to notice. Humans and animals can be separated by cellular, anatomic, and metabolic distinctions (“Animal Testing”). The fact that animals have different features makes them faulty subjects for humans. Drugs that make it through animal trials are not always appropriate. Just because a product was successful on a rodent doesn’t mean it will be on a human.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document