Pros And Cons Of Decriminalizing Drugs

589 Words3 Pages

On average, eight people succumbed to heroin every day last year in central Ohio (Johnson). That’s almost three-thousand people every year in Ohio alone. With the number of drug overdoses and deaths exponentially rising, is now the time to relax drug laws? This is the thought of many critical thinkers who believe that law enforcement and legal implications are not enough, but the founding efforts to combat drug abuse are still standing and prove to be preeminent compared to actively decriminalizing all class one drugs. Though decriminalizing drugs is a hot topic, it is not a rational move considering the United State’s current political structure, healthcare system, and legal system. Decriminalizing Drugs would put strain on the construction …show more content…

The United States Government has passed multiple laws and regulations to prevent drug abuse. The Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was created in 1906 to ensure the citizens’ safety and provide accurate information for consumers. Along with creating an entire independent regulatory agency, Congress also passed the Pure Food and Drug Act on the same day. The Pure Food and Drug Act set strict requirements on how contents can be listed and how the medications could be manufactured. This act was much needed. After all, how could the American government let their citizens down more than by allowing them to purchase substances that have not been regulated for appropriate safety and quality standards? Though this act did not specifically outlaw narcotics, it did start a domino effect for states to create antidrug laws of their own. An example of states creating their own anti-drug laws would be the Poison Acts of 1913 in California. California was the first of many states to ban marijuana and opiates (Dale H. Gieringer). These acts effectively branched multiple domains of the public’s