ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Federalism, Civil Rights, And Civil Liberties

1445 Words6 Pages

Federalism, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties When discussing the fundamentals of the United States, federalism, civil rights, and liberties are important topics to discuss. Federalism or the division of power between the federal and state levels of government is deeply embedded in the U.S. Constitution (Liberty University, 2022). Civil rights, on the other hand, were not necessarily originally embedded in the U.S. Constitution, however, they were fought for, added, and amended along the way to ensure the promises of the U.S. Constitution and the principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness apply to all people (Liberty University, 2022). Unlike civil rights, civil liberties were originally embedded in the U.S. Constitution to safeguard …show more content…

As a result, they might be more likely to back unfunded mandates to ensure that all states follow federal rules, even if it means using force. Civil Rights There are pros and cons to having Congress, which is an elected body, make decisions about civil rights. One of the benefits is that Congress represents the will of the people through their elected officials. This gives the policymaking process democratic authority. This lets voters hold representatives directly responsible for their decisions about civil liberties problems during elections (Kernell & Smith, 2019). Furthermore, Congress can change civil liberties laws to reflect shifting societal norms and preferences, which reflect the changing values of the population. However, there are also bad things about letting Congress make decisions about human liberties. Poverty and polarization in politics can make it hard to make decisions, which can cause gridlock or put party goals ahead of people's rights. This is a big worry. Also, the legislative process can be slow and complicated, which makes it hard to act quickly when new civil rights problems or crises arise (Kernell & Smith,

Show More
Related
360 Words | 2 Pages

If Madison’s proposal had gone through it would have just increased the bureaucracy in the government. Also ignoring how long it would take for a law to be passed in Congress, state laws are solely enforced in one state, so some laws would not make sense to other states; therefore it would be ridiculous to have congress

Read More
189 Words | 1 Pages

On the other hand, Cornell explains that this “will of the people” was often contorted on both sides as political debate. Thus, the “dissenting tradition” was not more than who was more qualified to run the government through countless debates and public appeal. As explained by Cornell,”Each side expended enormous energy crafting appeals to persuade citizens that it was better qualified to represent the will of the people” (Cornell 21). Thus, the Anti-Federalists were using the people to debate themselves in the public sphere to gain the will of the common man and avoid the evil corrupt centralized authority.

Read More
260 Words | 2 Pages

Jillan Wine’s short story “Jillian Giggs, a Teenage Perspective” portrays the positive effects that adversity has on the human spirit. The protagonist, Jillian Giggs, encounters several problems throughout her first year in grade 7, including her parents divorce, failing an important math test and her best friend moving to New York. When Jillian first learns of her parents’ divorce, she becomes depressed. This obstacle seems too difficult for her to overcome. She does, however, after speaking to her high school guidance counsellor eventually come to terms with her father and mother’s severed relationship

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout Federalist 10, Madison warned his audience of the dangers of factions. Madison believed that as long as people espoused differing opinions, came from different backgrounds, and especially, as long as there was an unequal distribution of property, people would form factions with like-minded individuals whose ideologies they shared. This grouping of people of America, in his opinion, would lead to great violence in the country that could harm the nation’s wellbeing. In order to remedy this problem, in which he viewed unequal distribution of property as the main culprit, Madison decided that setting up a Republic which would be composed of only the most qualified candidates and would be composed of a multitude of factions would be

Read More
254 Words | 2 Pages

In the 1790s two major parties dominated the political scene. Those parties were people who sided with Alexander Hamilton, known as “Federalists” while the people who supported Thomas Jefferson were the “Anti-Federalists”. During the conclusion of the table, it was quite evident that the Anti-Federalists were considered to be more liberal, or in a broader sense, Democratic than the other party at the time. This can be inferred through the notion that they supported France throughout the French Revolution because they hated Britain because they once controlled everything they did; while on the contrary, the Federalists, which consisted of mostly business people, supported Britain due to their importance in trades. They also were against the

Read More
1151 Words | 5 Pages

Read this excerpt from James Madison's Federalist No. 45 and answer the questions. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. The operations of the federal government will be most extensive and important in times of war and danger; those of the State governments, in times of peace and security. As the former periods will probably bear a small proportion to the latter, the State governments will here enjoy another advantage over the federal government.

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

Before the famous Constitution became published on September 17, 1787, there was a huge democracy over it since some people supported it (federalists), while others opposed it (anti-federalists). Basically the main arguments used by the Anti-Federalists in the discussion of the U.S. Constitution was the fact that the Constitution offered too much power to the federal government and that the rights of the people were not promised through a Bill of Rights. In order to get their words out, they had ratified convections for the thirteen states. They choose to go to Pennsylvania first because of its size, influence, and wealth.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

Under the guidance of Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, Federalists became a popular political party at the end of George Washington’s term. As a proud Federalists in the United States under Washington, a numerous amount of hypocrisy has consumed the population on, “What were Federalists’ views?” A Federalist strongly believed in the power of the national/central government because it would have yielded stability to the country. Instead of a democracy or popular sovereignty, an “aristocratic leader,” would have best led the nation (History in the Making- Chapter 10).

Read More
730 Words | 3 Pages

Under the guidance of Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, Federalists became a popular political party at the end of George Washington’s term. As a proud Federalists in The United Stated under George Washington, a numerous amount of hypocrisy has consumed the population on, “What were Federalists’ views?” A Federalist strongly believed in the power of the national government because the central government would have yielded stability to the country. Instead of a democracy or popular sovereignty, an “aristocratic leadership,” would better lead the nation (History in the Making - Chapter 10).

Read More
425 Words | 2 Pages

I would choose to be an Anti-Federalist because they did not loathe federalism, they just had felt the need to make some improvements. They had strived to put more power into the hands of the states. As the Anti-Federalists believes, I strongly agree with the constitution but I truly believe the bill of rights which was added later was very crucial to the U.S Constitution. The bill of rights has a big part in the citizen’s personal rights that people have all the time. I honestly can’t fathom what our country would be like if we did not have these rights being put into place.

Read More
600 Words | 3 Pages

Many times anti-federalist are given a misconception, they are portrayed as self-serving, nefarious, and unpatriotic trash of history. Really, many of the most visible Anti-Federalist were highly respected individuals who fought in the revolutionary war, signed the Deceleration of Independence, and were political strongholds in their own states. Some of these men were Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, and future president James Monroe. The opposing side consisted of men like Alexander hamilton, James Madison and George Washington.

Read More
199 Words | 1 Pages

Like any political thought sometimes it will agree with other and by other times disagreed just how the Federalist and Anti-Federalist happen to proceeded . However we can say that from both ways on the balance they would both provide compromise and at the end come together . To start with the Federalist Party that was lead by James Madison and happen to be in favor of the formed Constitution, which ideal point was to provide security to the union along with a variety of states that could encourage arise as a piece to the union. Madison would see the new republican form of government more enriched in Constitution due to all the overcome it could provide to the unions . Improvements such as in the infrastructure side of union taking all the

Read More
1823 Words | 8 Pages

The Government is the ultimate ruler of the people, sets the ultimate laws of the land and says what goes and when not pleased uses all the means in their power to influence. The basic functions of the United States government are listed in the Constitution. Due to the immense power of our federal government, people often argue that it is too powerful and should be lessened. Sub further the state governments use a sum of power to do the same. There has been an effort to shift power from the federal government to the states.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

It was all started with U.S. Constitution which laid out the ground work for our government and our rights. The civil rights we have keep being implemented and advanced as times goes on and our civil liberties have help us from the government taking too much control over us and making us not a federalism government and into a communist government that can control everything you do and belief in. I feel without these two that we would not be free today and that we will always have a conflict with them since they read differently by each set of supreme court

Read More
1216 Words | 5 Pages

There were many major movements and goals of the antebellum reform. Before the Civil War, almost 100 reform communities were instituted. Some were democratic, others were ruled over by an interesting leader. Most of them were motivated by religion, but some had desires to reverse social and economic changes. Almost all of these communities wanted to have a cooperative society, to revive social harmony in an individualistic society and to close the growing space between the rich and the poor.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Federalism, Civil Rights, And Civil Liberties

Open Document