Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing

1188 Words5 Pages

Standardized Testing and its Correlation to College Readiness Albert Einstein once said, “Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.” The ACT or the American College Test, is a standardized test that measures a student's ability in the common core classes. It is most known for being able to show correlation between a student and their college readiness. The ACT does not correlate to college readiness because students study for the test itself, rather than to retain academic knowledge, some advanced students are at a disadvantage, and students’ GPA shows more accuracy than the ACT score. The first part of this problem is that, students study for the …show more content…

It is the basis for all college's submission platforms. According to John Haltiwanger, senior politics writer for Elite Daily, “Students are now trained to take tests. Instead of developing critical-thinking skills, which the Common Core is apparently designed to promote, they're learning to become test-takers by memorizing rules and standards.” Students no longer study to retain, they develop test taking strategies that will not help them in the future. These tests are being used to grab points, not to actually learn the material. This furthers the claim, because it shows students study for the test and developing test taking skills, rather than to retain. Furthermore, in 2002, the United States passed a program called No Child Left Behind (NCLB). This requires states to test students on the common core classes, leading to more standardized tests (Elementary and Secondary Education Act). Since NCLB, the US scores have dropped in every common core class in terms of global ranking (National Research Council). This is a sign of how little standardized testing …show more content…

The ACT will test on the intelligence of the average student junior year. For example, the ACT will test a student on anything from Pre-Calculus and below in the math section. Most leading students have to go back to former education to prepare for the ACT. In a peer reviewed article published by Fairtest, and opposition viewpoints, it stated that “To improve learning and provide meaningful accountability, schools and districts cannot rely solely on standardized tests” and “Standardized exams offer few opportunities to display the attributes of higher-order thinking, including analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and creativity.” Both of these quotes show the designs of an advanced student. Progressive students usually show high order thinking, and improve their learning through tests and education. Standardized testing only creates a problem for the intellectually gifted and doesn’t test to the best of their abilities, furthering the claim of the disadvantages of exceptional students during standardized testing. Many students at Chaska High School have had problems with overcoming this challenge. Quincy Foss, a sophomore attending CHS and currently in Advanced Placement Calculus said, “being in advanced classes can affect my ability to take standardized tests, because I haven’t studied the material that I’m being tested on for a couple of years. I enjoy being in these classes, but sometimes I