ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Emergency Medical Treatment And Labor Act

783 Words4 Pages

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act requires anyone that comes to an emergency department to be treated and stabilized despite their ability or inability to pay. It was designed to keep hospitals from transferring uninsured patients to public hospitals without providing a medical screening examination. Congress passed the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act in 1986 as part of 1985’s Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. It improved healthcare delivery because patients had to get medical screening examinations before they could be transferred to public hospitals. It guaranteed nondiscriminatory access to emergency medical care. Despite this, it created controversy in the following 15 years. Hospitals were fined if they were not found in compliance with the Emergency Medical Treatment and …show more content…

• There are no more annual or lifetime dollar limits on care. • The marketplaces subsidize premium costs and out-of-pocket costs. • A single risk pool is created giving the individual and small group markets the same buying power as large group markets. • New rules and regulations stop insurance companies from making unjustified rate hikes. • Women cannot be charged more than men. • The amount insurers can discriminate price based on facts like age is restricted. • All plans must have minimum benefits regardless of cost. • Medicaid is expanded meaning free or low-cost insurance for more Americans. • Young adults can stay on their parents plan until 26. • Medicare gets a big overhaul meaning cheaper care for seniors and less costs for hospitals. • Doctors for the most part will see their rates stay the same or, in the case of Medicaid doctors will see their rates increase. • Hospitals are incentivized to provide quality care over quantity care,” (OBAMACARE FACTS, "Affordable

More about Pros And Cons Of The Emergency Medical Treatment And Labor Act

Open Document