Pros And Cons Of Wolfsanglism

645 Words3 Pages

I'm a 20-year-old Right-Wing Activist from Raleigh, North Carolina, and I'm trying to spearhead a new political movement called Wolfsanglism. Currently working with only 6 regular members, I'm hoping to attract a wider audience in the coming months. The philosophy can be simplified as progressive nationalism meets traditional environmentalism. Wolfsanglism is in the strictest sense an ideology based on a native population and the homeland of the native population; protecting, promoting and if necessary reviving the customs, traditions, worldview, values and religion that naturally came from each particular population in their homeland. It is important to note that this emphasis on what may be classified as blood and soil rhetoric, in no way implies any one population is superior to any other, only that it is an essential duty to …show more content…

My proposed solution is to re-appropriate hatred and tension brought about by this pride to be utilized for achieving peaceful and productive political goals. All the while, keeping the patriotism and racial pride intact, but eliminating the hate and contention between other groups experiencing similar pride. I have admitted, this concept is still a growing inkling, it is not entirely fleshed out, but I hope to gain support for the general sympathies and intentions. As a preemptive counter-argument, I am not advocating White Supremacy. White Supremacy focuses on the Caucasian race's duty to disassociate from other races and it’s inherent superiority over all human life. What I am proposing is that every race should, out of duty to their people, feel a sense of pride and independence, but not superiority. Due to the complex ties between race and nationality, this concept applies to nations as well. As such, separatist pride should be used for productive, unified progress, however separate the work to achieve this goal may