ipl-logo

The Impunity Gap Analysis

948 Words4 Pages

Over the past decades millions of civilians have been victims of those atrocity crimes as genocide, crimes against humanity, grave war crimes, and other gross human rights violations. As a response to these crimes it was voiced that these atrocities should never happen again and perpetrators should not go unpunished. Because, too often perpetrators committed atrocity crimes as a result of impunity. To close the “impunity gap” several tribunals were created, examples are the International Military Tribunal, the ICTY, and the ICTR. Still, with these tribunals, only a part of the perpetrators were reached and the “impunity gap” was still not closed. Therefore the idea started to rise that it was up to individual States to prosecute and try international …show more content…

Over the past years this ‘Western’ exercise of universal jurisdiction has been increasingly under attack by several Non-Western States and international organizations. For example, the AU has adopted several decisions, censuring the political abuse of universal jurisdiction in particular against African officials, by Western States. In 2008, the AU openly challenged the political nature and abuse of the principle of universal jurisdiction by judges from some non-African States against African leaders. It stated that the misuse of universal jurisdiction clearly violated the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the countries involved and it undermines the stability of African States. In its Decision on the Abuse of the Principle of Universal Jurisdiction (2009), the AU asserted that the principle of universal jurisdiction has been hijacked by judges from European States. Moreover, Tanzania, on behalf of the African States, requested to add the scope and application of the principle of universal jurisdiction to the agenda of the sixty-third session of the U.N. General Assembly. Also China, in its speech to the U.N. General Assembly, stated that universal jurisdiction was only an academic concept with no universally accepted …show more content…

Recently, based on universal jurisdiction, an Argentine judge asked Spain to arrest and extradite 20 former officials accused of abuses during the military rule of General Franco. Also, on October 30 2014, the South African Constitutional Court unanimously ruled that South Africa is obligated to investigate crimes against humanity, including torture, committed by Zimbabwean police in March 2007. Moreover the AU adopted in 2012 the AU Model National Law, whose aim is to provide to African countries to exercise universal jurisdiction over international crimes and give effect to its obligations under international law. However, these practices of universal jurisdiction do not mean that non-Western States are not critical towards the Western practice of universal jurisdiction. Looking at the comments made by non-Western States in the Sixth Committee of the U.N. General Assembly (Sixth Committee), it can be said that a lot of comments focus on the way in which Western States exercise universal jurisdiction. Also Western exercise of universal jurisdiction is not free of criticism uttered by Western legal experts, however unlike other criticism voiced by non-Western States, this is often voiced by legal experts and voiced towards the policy of

Show More
Related
978 Words | 4 Pages

International laws govern how countries and states should interact with each other international law has an impact on domestic laws through human rights treaties, importing and exporting of goods and global communications and connections. The Mabo case reflects this because the domestic law at the time didn’t match the international

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

Furthermore, one must keep in mind the term “civilians”. While torture and abuse are in and of themselves truly unethical, it is made even more so by the fact that these actions were taken against civilians, who by rights had little to no actual influence upon the fighting itself, and could hardly have been found guilty of anything occuring there. This simply seeks to enforce how easily the process of dehumanization can cause people to perform heinous and cruel acts upon other, at times even innocent

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

To many, violation of human rights is a serious issue. This shows that for every negative force, there is always someone who recognizes the wrong and seeks to correct

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

Article 6 states that crimes against peace, such as starting or planning a war, war crimes, such as violating the customs of war, and crimes against humanity, namely extermination, enslavement, and genocide will all be judged by the International Trbiunal (“Establishing the Nuremberg Tribunal”, 2017). The second and arguably most influential article of the charter of the International Tribunal was article 9. Article 9 states that an organization, such as a company, can be declared as criminal and all members of the institution are guilty of its evil. This however was strengthened by article 12, which states that an organization member’s position does not absolve them of any guilt. This means that anyone, regardless of rank or merit, is still punishable by the International Tribunal.

Read More
1372 Words | 6 Pages

Also to deal with genocide by national legislation like other international crimes, and to view it by moral concepts. Document A also says, “What we have to do is to protect great values of our civilization through such accepted institutions adjusted to a formula of international law.” We already have some sort of laws against genocide, but we now have to adjust those laws into making them more important so the whole world applies to them. For example, the Nuremberg Tribunal was forced to dismiss the Nazi crimes, because of the lack of international law against genocide. In document A, the international concept said, “the Nuremberg Tribunal had to dismiss the Nazi crimes committed in the period between the advent of Nazism to power and the beginning of the war, as revolting and horrible as many of these crimes were.”

Read More
1124 Words | 5 Pages

The following charges are not to be taken lightly as the actions of these figures lead to the subsequent death of millions. Clearly, justice had to be served to these criminals as ignoring their actions would be similar to neglecting that these millions did not die. In addition, after the mass casualties that ensued in World War II, justice could only be morally achieved in a court of law rather than senseless killing. The severity of their sentences weighed on how many charges they were guilty of. After the span of 9 months and 216 trials, a consensus was reached.

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

In the UNSC’s article 51, individual and collective self-defense can be authorized by the UNSC under the framework of collective security. However, genocide is never justifiable in the eyes of the UN. Perhaps the most distinguishing feature between war and genocide is the disproportionally ability of those involved to fight back. Within war there is a certain level of understanding that those engaging in the conflict will have an ability to engage in battle. However, historically in genocides the effected groups have had little to no ability to proportionately fight against their attackers.

Read More
889 Words | 4 Pages

Extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction can in many circumstances be a useful and legitimate response to transnational crime. Criminal activity is not always confined to territorial boarders, and so the law may seek to follow the crime to prevent an offender from enjoying impunity. A number of states have included in their criminal legislature provisions allowing for the investigation and prosecution of international crimes, even when such crime is committed outside their national territory and whether or not the perpetrators or the victims are nationals of the state concerned”. The importance of extraterritorial jurisdiction was also seen in the Advisory Opinion of 11 April 1949 – Reparations for injuries suffered in the service of the United Nations. Personnel of the UN were targeted in Palestine which culminated in the assassination of

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

INTROCUTION To translate the R2P principles to deeds will require serious commitment from all the governments who unanimously affirmed at the 2005 World Summit Outcome that “each individual State has the responsibility to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity” (UN world summit, 2005). To relies a credible implementation, it is necessary that Paragraphs 138 and 139 of the Outcome which goes to the real issue of operationalizing the responsibility to protect (widely referred to as “R2P” in English) is sincerely adhered to by all. This brief paper will cover current R2P debate and the complex issue of implementing the R2P pillars which are: Pillar one the protection responsibilities of the State (sect. II).

Read More
1035 Words | 5 Pages

Justice may sometimes be cruel and harsh, in being so, however, it is universal for each and every one of us and we defend our rights in the name of it. When certain violations of justice occur individual entities are charged with different cases for which they are called up on a trial. For everyone to get a fair trial, there are some aspects to the law that need to be respected. The likes are: the phenomena of the “due process”, questioning the credibility of the witnesses and the role of advocates' persistency when defending their clients. All of these, together with a great deal of other principals, have to be there for justice to be done to the whole society.

Read More
283 Words | 2 Pages

According to the United Nations, human rights are universal legal guarantees that protect individuals and groups against actions that interfere with fundamental freedoms and human dignity. In Brazil, there are many human rights issues that affect the nation in a variety of ways, for example, violence against police civilians and political racism. In an article written by Luis Kawaguti & Gary Duffy for BBC Brazil, the brutality of Police and negligent officials were spoken. Reports of rouge cops making meaningless killings of revenge or taking the law into their own hands were made by many citizens in Sao Paulo. A number of officials made comments stating that they take this issue of police negligence very seriously.

Read More
1479 Words | 6 Pages

The first is the country’s accession to the Rome Statute of the ICC on November 2000. This made it a state party to the court. In terms of Article 86 of the statute, state parties are duty bound to cooperate fully with the court in its investigation and prosecution of crimes within the jurisdiction of the court. To facilitate the ICC’s prosecution the government was obliged to arrest al-Bashir as soon as he landed in South Africa. The second is that in 2002 the South African parliament passed the Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Act 27.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Each year in many countries around the world people are murdered in the name of “justice”. But can justice really include a sanitised form of revenge? Many people are for the death penalty regardless of what it actually is. A major way that the death penalty is flawed is shown in the amount of innocent people who are sentenced to death.

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

There are reasons for this, first is that, internal implementation of international law is always conditioned by a rule of the state’s municipal law. Clearly stating that international law’ internal interpretation is always governed by the municipal constitution. Second is that in national courts, even a monist country, their courts may fail sometimes to execute treaties which are binding under international law. United State law is an example of non-self-executing treaty. While dualist country’s courts, unincorporated treaties are given limited effect on the internal process.

Read More
1867 Words | 8 Pages

This paper will try to asses that question in particular. Theoretical Framework  The concept of International Law International law, also called public international law or law of nations, is the body of legal rules, norms, and standards that apply between sovereign states and other entities that are legally recognized as international actors .  The concept of Power Politics Political action characterized by the exercise or pursuit of power as a means of coercion. International diplomacy based on the use or threatened use of military, political or economic power. Power politics is the core of realism, as realism assumes that states merely do something based on their national interest, and through whatever means necessary, including the means above.

Read More

More about The Impunity Gap Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document