Recommended: Resurfice vs Hanke
Da-Nisha Mitchell Anthro 3211 Test Your Knowledge Chapter 3 1.Judge or Jury who listens to tell if statements are true. 2.Evidence is anything, objects, witness that are used to make a defendant guilty or Innocent. 3.Circumstantial, conclusive, conflicting and exculpatory 4.Evidence used to make the defendant look Innocent 5.Looking at what is left behind; events, evidence. 6.A direct transfer is when it goes to the source like a drug dealer selling drugs to someone.
The Oka affair turned many heads in Canada, and the world. There were two sides, the Oka, and the Canadian government. Both sides thought they were in the right, but who was. This essay will talk about the rights and wrongs of each side. I have researched this topic from many point’s of view.
I was also able to provide evidence of how the author are able to support their claim. I used the fact that Rifkin supported his argument by using facts on animal health. This activity also shows
The explosion is ruled circumstantial and a large sum of money will be rewarded for the conviction of anyone criminally related to the incident. The ship is now fully submerged in the harbor with the exception of the mast. This had been one of the most devastating disasters that has ever taken place against the American Navy. Before the Attack
The Toulmin method is an effective tool that helps determine the efficacy of an argument by using this method the author’s argumentative strategies are evaluated to determine their strength. This essay will use the Toulmin method in order to assess the strength of James E. McWilliams’ argument. The Toulmin method will break down the author’s argument into components—the claim, evidence, warrant, qualifiers, and rebuttal. Through using the Toulmin method, Williams’ argument and the components of his argument will be dissected and individually analyzed to determine each component’s effectiveness and how it contributes to the overall power and credibility of Williams’ argument.
A few days after the civil War ended, President Lincoln was assassinated and never had the chance to implement his Reconstruction plan. The Reconstruction Era occurred in the period of 1865 to 1877 under the reign of President Andrew Johnson who was the predecessor of President Lincoln. Congress was not scheduled to convene until December 1865, which gave Johnson eight months to pursue his own Reconstruction policies. Under his Reconstruction policies, the former Confederate states were required to join back into the Union and heal the wounds of the nation.
This has resulted in an increased demand for prosecution to produce viable and tangible forensic evidence, in order to satisfy the high standard of proof in criminal proceedings. Donald E. Shelton conducted a survey in which he wanted to discover the amount of jurors that expected the prosecution to provide some form of scientific evidence; his findings showed that “46 percent expected to see some kind of scientific evidence in every criminal case. 22 percent expected to see DNA evidence in every criminal case. 36 percent expected to see fingerprint evidence in every criminal case. And 32 percent expected to see ballistic or other firearms laboratory evidence in every criminal case.”
He makes extensive uses of secondary evidence in support of his ideas, stating information and providing examples, while providing a basic context for the conditions and results of the American
This evidence clearly connects with the thesis because the
The Varying Policies for Reconstruction and Reunion Following the Southern defeat of the Civil War, President Lincoln had every intention of returning the rebellious states to the Union as quickly and painlessly as possible. During the war, he had already drafted a plan for reconstructing the torn nation, called the Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction. The plan involved returning land and granting pardon to most rebellious citizens (but not the higher Confederate officers and bureaucrats) and for the Southern state governments to handle the newly freed slaves however they chose, so long as they retained their freedom. This proclamation was also called the 10 Percent Plan, as the final policy was the the southern states could return
Toulmin’s Argument Outline Claim: The overall thesis the writer will argue for. Data: Evidence gathered to support the claim.
Reconstruction was the United States’ government’s project at attempting to rebuild the nation after the American Civil War. The main goal was creating a unified nation with the southern Confederate States rejoining the Union. From approximately 1863 to 1877 the nation sought several methods to successfully reconstruct the country (BOOK 447). There were multiple groups involved with the process. In hindsight, it is possible to draw commonalities between some groups and conflicts between others.
In my opinion, the presented evidence in regard to the claim and reasons are valid. Not only is the used evidence valid, but it is relevant and sufficient as well. As previously stated,
Evidence: (add information from other sources that also support the rebuttal) VII. Conclusion A. Concluding statement: Every child, regardless of his/her circumstances should be afforded the opportunity to thrive and live a productive life. VIII. A. Local, State and National Government leaders to advocate for Head Start funding because it has been cut by Trump’s Administration. References Short, K. S. (2016).
